g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\20018-12.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Dec 2 21:19:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:19:04 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] LED conversion for 600 series Message-ID: <9692ED94-1B05-4ED0-BA10-3399EB9CC3BF@gmail.com> I have a 600 Series system in a rack and one by one the lights have failed again. I live near NYC. Is there anybody nearby who could handle the conversion to LED lights?They should be warm and not too bright, like the originals. Kaz From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Dec 4 21:18:54 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Reel hub service In-Reply-To: <1565047907.1200667.1543867756536@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1565047907.1200667.1543867756536.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1565047907.1200667.1543867756536@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20356229.1941204.1543954734546@mail.yahoo.com> Hello Naks,New to the forum, but lifelong Nak fan.  Glad to be on the site.  I had some difficulties with the mail program, so this may not work, but we'll see if it does.  I have a question for the group.I'm servicing some 480 decks, and one of the things that I have not done as yet is to pull off the reel hubs and check for proper lubrication.  I usually take out the whole transport assembly and take it apart.  These are the Nak classic transport.  While I'm replacing the belts and cleaning and lubing the transport cam mechanism, I try to relube other moving parts as well.  I do clean and lightly lube the capstan shafts with light machine oil, and when I replace pinch rollers I also clean the old hardened grease off those shafts and lube with fresh lithium grease.  As for the reel hubs, it might seem like a silly question, but how do those reel hubs come off of their shafts?  It looks like the tiny cap at the end of the reel hub shaft is simply pressed on, but they are really tight and are hard to remove.  Is the right way to simply pull them off?  More importantly, is there any critical element in how to press them back on properly?  It seems a bit difficult to do and apply enough pressure to get the cap on all the way and bottom out on the shaft.Thanks in advance,  Tom On Monday, December 3, 2018, 12:09:16 PM PST, Tom Wiedmann wrote: Hello Naks,New to the forum, but lifelong Nak fan.  Glad to be on the site.  I had some difficulties with the mail program, so this may not work, but we'll see if it does.  I have a question for the group.I'm servicing some old 480 decks, and one of the things that I have not done as yet is to pull off the reel hubs and check for proper lubrication.  I usually take out the whole transport assembly and take it apart.  These are the Nak classic transport.  While I'm replacing the belts and cleaning and lubing the transport cam mechanism, I try to relube other moving parts as well.  I do clean and lightly lube the capstan shafts with light machine oil, and when I replace pinch rollers I also clean those shafts and lube with fresh lithium grease.  As for the reel hubs, it might seem like a silly question, but how do those darn reel hubs come off of their shafts?  It looks like the tiny cap at the end of the reel hub shaft is simply pressed on, but they are really tight and are hard to remove.  Is the right way to simply pull them off?  More importantly, is there any critical element in how to press them back on properly?  It seems a bit difficult to do and apply enough pressure to get the cap on all the way and bottom out on the shaft.Thanks in advance,  Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Dec 4 22:46:51 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:46:51 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <001e01d48c1a$de87b120$9b971360$@verizon.net> I tried to set the record head height per SM and couldn't do it . TP102 was unresponsive or real low (#43) on the meter with head adjustment whereas TP 202(#42) was high and there was some control with the head adjust. This circuit might be the problem and there is always those Dolby chips ua7300PC. I did check the head with the diode function on my meter and both side measured the same . I haven't given up ,any ideas ? From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 7:11 PM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: RE: [naktalk] nak 481 recap The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:19 PM To: calijente at gmx.net; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). Good luck, Axe On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 5 00:55:56 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:55:56 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <003e01d48c2c$e89ab650$b9d022f0$@aol.com> Hi Calman46 The first thing I would check would be the bias oscillator. Do you have a CRO (Oscilloscope) or a DVM? If possible check to see if the bias oscillator is oscillating at about 105KHz, and check the output amplitude. In the record mode, there should be a large nicely sinusoidal signal at the bias oscillator output with an amplitude of about 26Vrms or about 74V Pk-Pk. The two 4.7nF orange caps in the bias oscillator account for a large percentage of record problems in a 481. If you fitted new ones (2 X 4.7nF polypropylene) when you recapped, that shouldn't be a problem, but maybe just make sure the solder joints are good. If the bias oscillator isn't the problem, and you’ve said Play is OK, the alignment of the Record Head would be another key reason for record problems in your 481. Not to mention a few dozen other possibilities, but try the bias oscillator first. Regards John Gipps 1. Re: nak 481 recap (calman46 via Naktalk) Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:10:40 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 5 12:39:39 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:39:39 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 In-Reply-To: <003e01d48c2c$e89ab650$b9d022f0$@aol.com> References: <003e01d48c2c$e89ab650$b9d022f0$@aol.com> Message-ID: <008301d48c8f$35a49ee0$a0eddca0$@verizon.net> Hi john , I checked the bias oscillator with a function generator and it's there 105KHz. I'll look at it with the o-scope and check those 4.7nf caps Thanks, Jim Callahan From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:56 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Cc: JohnGipps at aol.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi Calman46 The first thing I would check would be the bias oscillator. Do you have a CRO (Oscilloscope) or a DVM? If possible check to see if the bias oscillator is oscillating at about 105KHz, and check the output amplitude. In the record mode, there should be a large nicely sinusoidal signal at the bias oscillator output with an amplitude of about 26Vrms or about 74V Pk-Pk. The two 4.7nF orange caps in the bias oscillator account for a large percentage of record problems in a 481. If you fitted new ones (2 X 4.7nF polypropylene) when you recapped, that shouldn't be a problem, but maybe just make sure the solder joints are good. If the bias oscillator isn't the problem, and you’ve said Play is OK, the alignment of the Record Head would be another key reason for record problems in your 481. Not to mention a few dozen other possibilities, but try the bias oscillator first. Regards John Gipps 1. Re: nak 481 recap (calman46 via Naktalk) Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:10:40 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 5 13:39:54 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 In-Reply-To: <008301d48c8f$35a49ee0$a0eddca0$@verizon.net> References: <003e01d48c2c$e89ab650$b9d022f0$@aol.com> <008301d48c8f$35a49ee0$a0eddca0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 6:40 AM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi john , I checked the bias oscillator with a function generator and it's there 105KHz. I'll look at it with the o-scope and check those 4.7nf caps Thanks, Jim Callahan From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:56 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Cc: JohnGipps at aol.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi Calman46 The first thing I would check would be the bias oscillator. Do you have a CRO (Oscilloscope) or a DVM? If possible check to see if the bias oscillator is oscillating at about 105KHz, and check the output amplitude. In the record mode, there should be a large nicely sinusoidal signal at the bias oscillator output with an amplitude of about 26Vrms or about 74V Pk-Pk. The two 4.7nF orange caps in the bias oscillator account for a large percentage of record problems in a 481. If you fitted new ones (2 X 4.7nF polypropylene) when you recapped, that shouldn't be a problem, but maybe just make sure the solder joints are good. If the bias oscillator isn't the problem, and you’ve said Play is OK, the alignment of the Record Head would be another key reason for record problems in your 481. Not to mention a few dozen other possibilities, but try the bias oscillator first. Regards John Gipps 1. Re: nak 481 recap (calman46 via Naktalk) Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:10:40 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 7 03:08:11 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Jason Nims via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:08:11 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Nak 1000 Lid Assembly cover? Message-ID: <7CE03205-DF32-416B-B853-7EF71935D960@me.com> Hi all I’ve got a Nak 1000 that I rescued from a local vintage shop where I don’t know how long it would have sat had I not stumbled upon it. I’ve done a clean up, lubrication, checked belts, etc. It’s in good shape generally. What I find is that the worst aging is in adhesive and foam. For adhesive I had to remove the black metal face from the front panel since the adhesive had dried and the two metal plates were separating. For the foam the issue was the cassette “lid”. The cassette lid (the faux leather door) was in poor shape - the foam inside had deteriorated somewhat and the vinyl had pretty severe rippling. It didn’t look nice and tidy as original and not like other decks I’ve seen. I’ve done a DIY repair for now, creating a new foam layer underneath the vinyl. But getting it cleanly glued back into the plastic housing perfectly as original is pretty tricky. It’s pretty good, but not perfect. So, wondering if anyone has an unused Cassette Lid Assembly, part number HA-3570, as shown in the Service Manual diagram 5.1 - Mechanism Assembly, and parts list (pp 22, 23). I think the whole piece will be in great shape if I swap out the door for one that is closer to original condition. Cheers Jason Jason Nims nimsy at me.com From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 7 08:33:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bala Ganesh Chandra via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:33:15 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Nak 1000 Lid Assembly cover? In-Reply-To: <7CE03205-DF32-416B-B853-7EF71935D960@me.com> References: <7CE03205-DF32-416B-B853-7EF71935D960@me.com> Message-ID: Is there an upholsterer who can help in your neighborhood ? Kind Regards, Bala Ganesh > On 7 Dec 2018, at 12:08 pm, Jason Nims via Naktalk wrote: > > Hi all > > I’ve got a Nak 1000 that I rescued from a local vintage shop where I don’t know how long it would have sat had I not stumbled upon it. I’ve done a clean up, lubrication, checked belts, etc. It’s in good shape generally. > > What I find is that the worst aging is in adhesive and foam. For adhesive I had to remove the black metal face from the front panel since the adhesive had dried and the two metal plates were separating. For the foam the issue was the cassette “lid”. > > The cassette lid (the faux leather door) was in poor shape - the foam inside had deteriorated somewhat and the vinyl had pretty severe rippling. It didn’t look nice and tidy as original and not like other decks I’ve seen. I’ve done a DIY repair for now, creating a new foam layer underneath the vinyl. But getting it cleanly glued back into the plastic housing perfectly as original is pretty tricky. It’s pretty good, but not perfect. > > So, wondering if anyone has an unused Cassette Lid Assembly, part number HA-3570, as shown in the Service Manual diagram 5.1 - Mechanism Assembly, and parts list (pp 22, 23). I think the whole piece will be in great shape if I swap out the door for one that is closer to original condition. > > Cheers > Jason > > Jason Nims > nimsy at me.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Dec 9 21:38:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ali Hingoro via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:38:33 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Reel hub service In-Reply-To: <20356229.1941204.1543954734546@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1565047907.1200667.1543867756536.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1565047907.1200667.1543867756536@mail.yahoo.com> <20356229.1941204.1543954734546@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Tom, Just pull the tiny end caps straight up gently and firmly and with enough pressure that they don’t come off in. Rush and fly off as there is spring underneath and they are a pain to find once they fly off and hide on the floor in the least likely place you will find them beleive me it happens speaking from experience!:) yes lubricating the metal shaft of the hubs like those of the capstan is quite important you will notice how fast the ffwd and rewind time is !! best regards! Ali On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk < naktalk at lists.naks.com> wrote: > Hello Naks, > New to the forum, but lifelong Nak fan. Glad to be on the site. I had > some difficulties with the mail program, so this may not work, but we'll > see if it does. I have a question for the group. > I'm servicing some 480 decks, and one of the things that I have not done > as yet is to pull off the reel hubs and check for proper lubrication. I > usually take out the whole transport assembly and take it apart. These are > the Nak classic transport. While I'm replacing the belts and cleaning and > lubing the transport cam mechanism, I try to relube other moving parts as > well. I do clean and lightly lube the capstan shafts with light machine > oil, and when I replace pinch rollers I also clean the old hardened grease > off those shafts and lube with fresh lithium grease. > As for the reel hubs, it might seem like a silly question, but how do > those reel hubs come off of their shafts? It looks like the tiny cap at > the end of the reel hub shaft is simply pressed on, but they are really > tight and are hard to remove. Is the right way to simply pull them off? > More importantly, is there any critical element in how to press them back > on properly? It seems a bit difficult to do and apply enough pressure to > get the cap on all the way and bottom out on the shaft. > Thanks in advance, Tom > > > On Monday, December 3, 2018, 12:09:16 PM PST, Tom Wiedmann < > therabbitrancher at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hello Naks, > New to the forum, but lifelong Nak fan. Glad to be on the site. I had > some difficulties with the mail program, so this may not work, but we'll > see if it does. I have a question for the group. > I'm servicing some old 480 decks, and one of the things that I have not > done as yet is to pull off the reel hubs and check for proper lubrication. > I usually take out the whole transport assembly and take it apart. These > are the Nak classic transport. While I'm replacing the belts and cleaning > and lubing the transport cam mechanism, I try to relube other moving parts > as well. I do clean and lightly lube the capstan shafts with light machine > oil, and when I replace pinch rollers I also clean those shafts and lube > with fresh lithium grease. > As for the reel hubs, it might seem like a silly question, but how do > those darn reel hubs come off of their shafts? It looks like the tiny cap > at the end of the reel hub shaft is simply pressed on, but they are really > tight and are hard to remove. Is the right way to simply pull them off? > More importantly, is there any critical element in how to press them back > on properly? It seems a bit difficult to do and apply enough pressure to > get the cap on all the way and bottom out on the shaft. > Thanks in advance, Tom > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Dec 10 01:45:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Reel hub service References: <1330889333.1498806.1544402709997.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1330889333.1498806.1544402709997@mail.yahoo.com> Thank you for the advice, Ali!  I already discovered for myself the issue you mention, as there is one of those little springs somewhere in my office room, never to be seen again, most likely.  Is there any magic related to pressing the caps back on?  I don't want to bend or break anything, and it's a little hard to tell if they've bottomed out.  Ideally perhaps a small arbor press would help avoid side loads, but there doesn't seem to be any way to back them properly for a press.  I just used my fingers and pushed as hard as I could.  Best regards,  Tom On Sunday, December 9,2018, 12:38:45 PM PST, Ali Hingoro wrote:  Hi Tom, Just pull thetiny end caps straight up gently and firmly and with enough pressure that theydon’t come off in. Rush and fly off as there is spring underneath and they area pain to find once they fly off and hide on the floor in the least likely placeyou will find them beleive me it happens speaking from experience!:) yeslubricating the metal shaft of the hubs like those of the capstan is quiteimportant you will notice how fast the ffwd and rewind time is !! best regards!Ali  -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Dec 10 14:22:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tim Rusling via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Reel hub service In-Reply-To: <1330889333.1498806.1544402709997@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1330889333.1498806.1544402709997.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1330889333.1498806.1544402709997@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2088524091.1529098.1544448123813@mail.yahoo.com> This exemplifies the value of the Naktalk community - likeminded people of varying skill levels helping each other out with the brand they all love.Tim Rusling On Monday, December 10, 2018, 1:59:25 a.m. EST, Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk wrote: Thank you for the advice, Ali!  I already discovered for myself the issue you mention, as there is one of those little springs somewhere in my office room, never to be seen again, most likely.  Is there any magic related to pressing the caps back on?  I don't want to bend or break anything, and it's a little hard to tell if they've bottomed out.  Ideally perhaps a small arbor press would help avoid side loads, but there doesn't seem to be any way to back them properly for a press.  I just used my fingers and pushed as hard as I could.  Best regards,  Tom On Sunday, December 9,2018, 12:38:45 PM PST, Ali Hingoro wrote:  Hi Tom, Just pull thetiny end caps straight up gently and firmly and with enough pressure that theydon’t come off in. Rush and fly off as there is spring underneath and they area pain to find once they fly off and hide on the floor in the least likely placeyou will find them beleive me it happens speaking from experience!:) yeslubricating the metal shaft of the hubs like those of the capstan is quiteimportant you will notice how fast the ffwd and rewind time is !! best regards!Ali  ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 12 01:08:51 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:08:51 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Victor Message-ID: <201812120008.wBC08p03029523@mail113c7.megamailservers.com> Victor, are you still out there? Any of the Sony metal XR's left ? Cheers, Rainer (80stech) From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 12 02:23:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:23:46 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp Message-ID: <201812120123.wBC1NkIb022002@mail116c7.megamailservers.com> Cheryl Kaupp , are you still a Naktalker? If so, pass on the greeting to who ever in the community! Cheers! :) , Rainer S.   From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 12 03:15:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Victor Gabrenas via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:15:00 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] Victor In-Reply-To: <201812120008.wBC08p03029523@mail113c7.megamailservers.com> References: <201812120008.wBC08p03029523@mail113c7.megamailservers.com> Message-ID: <69A4EC89-6C1C-44D2-A4C7-F0E16B4E41A9@math.utah.edu> I do. How many do you want? Victor M. Gabrenas > On Dec 11, 2018, at 5:08 PM, Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk wrote: > > Victor, are you still out there? Any of the Sony metal XR's left ? > > Cheers, > Rainer (80stech) > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 12 17:26:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:26:42 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp In-Reply-To: <201812120123.wBC1NkIb022002@mail116c7.megamailservers.com> References: <201812120123.wBC1NkIb022002@mail116c7.megamailservers.com> Message-ID: <008901d49237$7791afc0$66b50f40$@jbrudy.com> I'M STILL HERE -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:24 PM To: naktalk at naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp Cheryl Kaupp , are you still a Naktalker? If so, pass on the greeting to who ever in the community! Cheers! :) , Rainer S. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 12 17:26:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:26:42 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp In-Reply-To: <201812120123.wBC1NkIb022002@mail116c7.megamailservers.com> References: <201812120123.wBC1NkIb022002@mail116c7.megamailservers.com> Message-ID: <008901d49237$7791afc0$66b50f40$@jbrudy.com> I'M STILL HERE -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:24 PM To: naktalk at naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp Cheryl Kaupp , are you still a Naktalker? If so, pass on the greeting to who ever in the community! Cheers! :) , Rainer S. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 12 18:19:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ural Durusu via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:19:42 +0300 Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp In-Reply-To: <008901d49237$7791afc0$66b50f40$@jbrudy.com> References: <201812120123.wBC1NkIb022002@mail116c7.megamailservers.com> <008901d49237$7791afc0$66b50f40$@jbrudy.com> Message-ID: <4221F06A-24D1-4C42-832F-776FD5924B04@ttmail.com> Also I am here. iPhone’umdan gönderildi via Naktalk şunları yazdı (12 Ara 2018 19:26): > I'M STILL HERE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:24 PM > To: naktalk at naks.com > Subject: [naktalk] Cheryl Kaupp > > Cheryl Kaupp , are you still a Naktalker? > > If so, pass on the greeting to who ever in the community! > > Cheers! :) , > Rainer S. > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 01:35:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:35:18 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 References: <003e01d48c2c$e89ab650$b9d022f0$@aol.com> <008301d48c8f$35a49ee0$a0eddca0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <000001d4927b$b97c70c0$2c755240$@verizon.net> I got the deck (Nak 481) to record in all 3 tape types without the distortion but the recorded volume is still too low compared to the source . I'm having trouble with #8 & #9 on the adjustment chart , the coils don't respond when turned. I have AC millivolt meters on the record head jack , I not sure if I have them connected correctly though, do I unplug the recorded head ? From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 7:40 AM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; 'naktalk-request at lists.naks.com' Subject: RE: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 6:40 AM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi john , I checked the bias oscillator with a function generator and it's there 105KHz. I'll look at it with the o-scope and check those 4.7nf caps Thanks, Jim Callahan From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:56 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Cc: JohnGipps at aol.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi Calman46 The first thing I would check would be the bias oscillator. Do you have a CRO (Oscilloscope) or a DVM? If possible check to see if the bias oscillator is oscillating at about 105KHz, and check the output amplitude. In the record mode, there should be a large nicely sinusoidal signal at the bias oscillator output with an amplitude of about 26Vrms or about 74V Pk-Pk. The two 4.7nF orange caps in the bias oscillator account for a large percentage of record problems in a 481. If you fitted new ones (2 X 4.7nF polypropylene) when you recapped, that shouldn't be a problem, but maybe just make sure the solder joints are good. If the bias oscillator isn't the problem, and you’ve said Play is OK, the alignment of the Record Head would be another key reason for record problems in your 481. Not to mention a few dozen other possibilities, but try the bias oscillator first. Regards John Gipps 1. Re: nak 481 recap (calman46 via Naktalk) Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:10:40 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 16:53:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:53:59 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 References: <003e01d48c2c$e89ab650$b9d022f0$@aol.com> <008301d48c8f$35a49ee0$a0eddca0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <006001d492fc$10a500d0$31ef0270$@verizon.net> Sorry its #9 that won't adjust and I get different readings off CN5-1 &2, CN5-3&4 if I use a digital bench AC meter I get 5vAC with input volume maxed. With an analog AC millivolt I next to nothing . So L104 (L204), L105 (L205 ) don't adjust or I have my meters hooked up incorrectly , anybody ? From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:35 PM To: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; 'naktalk-request at lists.naks.com' Subject: RE: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 I got the deck (Nak 481) to record in all 3 tape types without the distortion but the recorded volume is still too low compared to the source . I'm having trouble with #9 & #10 on the adjustment chart , the coils don't respond when turned. I have AC millivolt meters on the record head jack , I not sure if I have them connected correctly though, do I unplug the recorded head ? From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 7:40 AM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; 'naktalk-request at lists.naks.com' Subject: RE: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 6:40 AM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi john , I checked the bias oscillator with a function generator and it's there 105KHz. I'll look at it with the o-scope and check those 4.7nf caps Thanks, Jim Callahan From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:56 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Cc: JohnGipps at aol.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Hi Calman46 The first thing I would check would be the bias oscillator. Do you have a CRO (Oscilloscope) or a DVM? If possible check to see if the bias oscillator is oscillating at about 105KHz, and check the output amplitude. In the record mode, there should be a large nicely sinusoidal signal at the bias oscillator output with an amplitude of about 26Vrms or about 74V Pk-Pk. The two 4.7nF orange caps in the bias oscillator account for a large percentage of record problems in a 481. If you fitted new ones (2 X 4.7nF polypropylene) when you recapped, that shouldn't be a problem, but maybe just make sure the solder joints are good. If the bias oscillator isn't the problem, and you’ve said Play is OK, the alignment of the Record Head would be another key reason for record problems in your 481. Not to mention a few dozen other possibilities, but try the bias oscillator first. Regards John Gipps 1. Re: nak 481 recap (calman46 via Naktalk) Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:10:40 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 18:25:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:25:42 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <004101d49308$e3a2b660$aae82320$@aol.com> Hi Jim Apologies for the delay in replying, and I'm doing a bit of catch-up here. Glad to see you're getting a 105KHz sine wave output from your bias oscillator, but the output level you report seems low. I would have expected more than 15Vrms - more like about 26Vrms at pin 24. So it might be wise for you to backtrack a little, and check to see that you're getting effective erasure, and that the DC Voltages measured in your bias oscillator are somewhere near the values shown on the schematic. The main power supply to the bias oscillator should be giving you 24V, and the voltage after R310 and R311 should be about 19V. Usually one of R311 and R310 is shorted - usually it's R310, the 39 Ohm resistor. Check with your fingers to see that the three transistors in the bias oscillator (Q301, Q302, Q303) aren't overheating. To check erasure, choose a recorded tape you don't mind erasing, and pass it though the machine in the record mode but with no record signal. Rewind, play, and see how well you've erased it. The things that are most likely to be giving you bad record results are.... 1. Incorrect Bias Level for the tape you're recording on. 2. Incorrect Record Level for the tape you're recording on. 3. Record Head misalignment - Track and Azimuth of the Record Head. You need to get these fundamentals right first before spending time on bias trap adjustments, and record head equalisation as mentioned in your later posts. You've said that playback is quite good, and that indicates that the Play Head Track and Azimuth are probably somewhere near ok. I'm assuming you haven't changed all the bias and record level settings - they must have been somewhere near appropriate previously. So hopefully, record level and bias, while not being optimal, should still be workable. So make sure the bias oscillator really is healthy, and then try adjustment of Record Head Track. You can adjust this so as to maximise the play back level of a low frequency high amplitude recording that you make - eg 400Hz at 0dB record level. Good luck Jim Regards John Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 18:56:08 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:56:08 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000001d4930d$237a1bd0$6a6e5370$@aol.com> Hi Jim Just a quick note here. As in my previous response, forget about bias trap and record EQ adjustments for the moment. While these do matter, they won't be responsible for the low record levels you're getting. How low are the record levels you're getting? Regards John Gipps Message: 4 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:35:18 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <000001d4927b$b97c70c0$2c755240$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I got the deck (Nak 481) to record in all 3 tape types without the distortion but the recorded volume is still too low compared to the source . I'm having trouble with #8 & #9 on the adjustment chart , the coils don't respond when turned. I have AC millivolt meters on the record head jack , I not sure if I have them connected correctly though, do I unplug the recorded head ? From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 21:20:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:20:01 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: <000001d4930d$237a1bd0$6a6e5370$@aol.com> References: <000001d4930d$237a1bd0$6a6e5370$@aol.com> Message-ID: <00ab01d49321$3ab7e0c0$b027a240$@verizon.net> The recorded levels are real low . I can barely hear it and I have to have the record level maxed out . It was better yesterday at lease I could hear it . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:56 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Cc: JohnGipps at aol.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 8 Hi Jim Just a quick note here. As in my previous response, forget about bias trap and record EQ adjustments for the moment. While these do matter, they won't be responsible for the low record levels you're getting. How low are the record levels you're getting? Regards John Gipps Message: 4 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:35:18 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <000001d4927b$b97c70c0$2c755240$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I got the deck (Nak 481) to record in all 3 tape types without the distortion but the recorded volume is still too low compared to the source . I'm having trouble with #8 & #9 on the adjustment chart , the coils don't respond when turned. I have AC millivolt meters on the record head jack , I not sure if I have them connected correctly though, do I unplug the recorded head ? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 22:05:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:05:15 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: <00ab01d49321$3ab7e0c0$b027a240$@verizon.net> References: <000001d4930d$237a1bd0$6a6e5370$@aol.com> <00ab01d49321$3ab7e0c0$b027a240$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <00af01d49327$8c86d040$a59470c0$@verizon.net> Ok the deck is recording but I to have the record level in the red on VU (+7) and it plays back at -10db on EX(and a little distorted ) and around 0db on ZX but clear . I'll try SX next -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 3:20 PM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 8 The recorded levels are real low . I can barely hear it and I have to have the record level maxed out . It was better yesterday at lease I could hear it . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:56 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Cc: JohnGipps at aol.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 8 Hi Jim Just a quick note here. As in my previous response, forget about bias trap and record EQ adjustments for the moment. While these do matter, they won't be responsible for the low record levels you're getting. How low are the record levels you're getting? Regards John Gipps Message: 4 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:35:18 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <000001d4927b$b97c70c0$2c755240$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I got the deck (Nak 481) to record in all 3 tape types without the distortion but the recorded volume is still too low compared to the source . I'm having trouble with #8 & #9 on the adjustment chart , the coils don't respond when turned. I have AC millivolt meters on the record head jack , I not sure if I have them connected correctly though, do I unplug the recorded head ? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 13 22:34:36 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:34:36 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 In-Reply-To: <004101d49308$e3a2b660$aae82320$@aol.com> References: <004101d49308$e3a2b660$aae82320$@aol.com> Message-ID: <00b001d4932b$a5ee1f30$f1ca5d90$@verizon.net> I miss this reply John , I'm on it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:26 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 Hi Jim Apologies for the delay in replying, and I'm doing a bit of catch-up here. Glad to see you're getting a 105KHz sine wave output from your bias oscillator, but the output level you report seems low. I would have expected more than 15Vrms - more like about 26Vrms at pin 24. So it might be wise for you to backtrack a little, and check to see that you're getting effective erasure, and that the DC Voltages measured in your bias oscillator are somewhere near the values shown on the schematic. The main power supply to the bias oscillator should be giving you 24V, and the voltage after R310 and R311 should be about 19V. Usually one of R311 and R310 is shorted - usually it's R310, the 39 Ohm resistor. Check with your fingers to see that the three transistors in the bias oscillator (Q301, Q302, Q303) aren't overheating. To check erasure, choose a recorded tape you don't mind erasing, and pass it though the machine in the record mode but with no record signal. Rewind, play, and see how well you've erased it. The things that are most likely to be giving you bad record results are.... 1. Incorrect Bias Level for the tape you're recording on. 2. Incorrect Record Level for the tape you're recording on. 3. Record Head misalignment - Track and Azimuth of the Record Head. You need to get these fundamentals right first before spending time on bias trap adjustments, and record head equalisation as mentioned in your later posts. You've said that playback is quite good, and that indicates that the Play Head Track and Azimuth are probably somewhere near ok. I'm assuming you haven't changed all the bias and record level settings - they must have been somewhere near appropriate previously. So hopefully, record level and bias, while not being optimal, should still be workable. So make sure the bias oscillator really is healthy, and then try adjustment of Record Head Track. You can adjust this so as to maximise the play back level of a low frequency high amplitude recording that you make - eg 400Hz at 0dB record level. Good luck Jim Regards John Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 14 01:31:29 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:31:29 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Message-ID: <00ed01d49344$5b82e070$1288a150$@verizon.net> Hi John , I went back to pin#24 , I have 105KHz , 21VAC, 59.6VPP . I have 23.32vdc the bias voltage at IC401 and 17.08vdc at R311 and R301 junction . The voltages are low but not by much. Q301-Q303 are cool and no crazy voltages on them. I was having a problem setting the record height and azimuth (AC millivolt meters on #42 +) . So I adjusted the bias and record level while the deck was recording and watching the AC millivolt meters .I got one side record at 0db and plays back also at 0db, but the record level is full CCW . The other side not so good the signal is fluctuating . I tried to steady the signal with the bias and it helped a little but the AC millivolt meter needle is swaying back and forth . Do you think its tape and head contact ? I will check the tape path also . Thanks for your help John , I really appreciated it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:35 PM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 I miss this reply John , I'm on it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:26 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 Hi Jim Apologies for the delay in replying, and I'm doing a bit of catch-up here. Glad to see you're getting a 105KHz sine wave output from your bias oscillator, but the output level you report seems low. I would have expected more than 15Vrms - more like about 26Vrms at pin 24. So it might be wise for you to backtrack a little, and check to see that you're getting effective erasure, and that the DC Voltages measured in your bias oscillator are somewhere near the values shown on the schematic. The main power supply to the bias oscillator should be giving you 24V, and the voltage after R310 and R311 should be about 19V. Usually one of R311 and R310 is shorted - usually it's R310, the 39 Ohm resistor. Check with your fingers to see that the three transistors in the bias oscillator (Q301, Q302, Q303) aren't overheating. To check erasure, choose a recorded tape you don't mind erasing, and pass it though the machine in the record mode but with no record signal. Rewind, play, and see how well you've erased it. The things that are most likely to be giving you bad record results are.... 1. Incorrect Bias Level for the tape you're recording on. 2. Incorrect Record Level for the tape you're recording on. 3. Record Head misalignment - Track and Azimuth of the Record Head. You need to get these fundamentals right first before spending time on bias trap adjustments, and record head equalisation as mentioned in your later posts. You've said that playback is quite good, and that indicates that the Play Head Track and Azimuth are probably somewhere near ok. I'm assuming you haven't changed all the bias and record level settings - they must have been somewhere near appropriate previously. So hopefully, record level and bias, while not being optimal, should still be workable. So make sure the bias oscillator really is healthy, and then try adjustment of Record Head Track. You can adjust this so as to maximise the play back level of a low frequency high amplitude recording that you make - eg 400Hz at 0dB record level. Good luck Jim Regards John Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 14 14:17:31 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Peter Tanner via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:17:31 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Nak 481 Message-ID: Hi all, I have been reading with interest the posts on a 481. Since I have a 481Z I thought I'd ask a couple of questions. The deck's been playing well up to now but recently I've noticed the playback motor doesn't always stop when the transport is stopped. In other words the capstans are still moving when the cassette door is open and the playback is stopped. In the 480 series I understand the motors don't move in the stop mode unlike in the 580 series or other later decks. It also has an occasional other problem not sure if it's related. The other day while I put a cassette in to play the record light came on and off even though tabs on the cassette had been already removed. I stopped the play but somehow parts of the cassette was erased. Quite irritating. I then put in a blank tape with its tabs intact and kept playing and stopping several times, putting it in the record mode on and off and it has not done it since although the capstan motor still doesn't want to stop on occasions when everything is off. Any ideas? Thanks Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 14 15:36:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:36:22 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE In-Reply-To: <00ed01d49344$5b82e070$1288a150$@verizon.net> References: <00ed01d49344$5b82e070$1288a150$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <014f01d493ba$6345b5a0$29d120e0$@verizon.net> Ok I shorted R310 (it wasn't originally ) and I now have 18.6v @ R311 just like the schematic . The erase head is working . I'm looking at the head block Its not engaging completely . This could be it why head adjustment is not working correctly , it only seems to effect one side . My first Nak repair ,learning a lot . -----Original Message----- From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 7:31 PM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: RE: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Hi John , I went back to pin#24 , I have 105KHz , 21VAC, 59.6VPP . I have 23.32vdc the bias voltage at IC401 and 17.08vdc at R311 and R301 junction . The voltages are low but not by much. Q301-Q303 are cool and no crazy voltages on them. I was having a problem setting the record height and azimuth (AC millivolt meters on #42 +) . So I adjusted the bias and record level while the deck was recording and watching the AC millivolt meters .I got one side record at 0db and plays back also at 0db, but the record level is full CCW . The other side not so good the signal is fluctuating . I tried to steady the signal with the bias and it helped a little but the AC millivolt meter needle is swaying back and forth . Do you think its tape and head contact ? I will check the tape path also . Thanks for your help John , I really appreciated it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:35 PM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 I miss this reply John , I'm on it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:26 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 Hi Jim Apologies for the delay in replying, and I'm doing a bit of catch-up here. Glad to see you're getting a 105KHz sine wave output from your bias oscillator, but the output level you report seems low. I would have expected more than 15Vrms - more like about 26Vrms at pin 24. So it might be wise for you to backtrack a little, and check to see that you're getting effective erasure, and that the DC Voltages measured in your bias oscillator are somewhere near the values shown on the schematic. The main power supply to the bias oscillator should be giving you 24V, and the voltage after R310 and R311 should be about 19V. Usually one of R311 and R310 is shorted - usually it's R310, the 39 Ohm resistor. Check with your fingers to see that the three transistors in the bias oscillator (Q301, Q302, Q303) aren't overheating. To check erasure, choose a recorded tape you don't mind erasing, and pass it though the machine in the record mode but with no record signal. Rewind, play, and see how well you've erased it. The things that are most likely to be giving you bad record results are.... 1. Incorrect Bias Level for the tape you're recording on. 2. Incorrect Record Level for the tape you're recording on. 3. Record Head misalignment - Track and Azimuth of the Record Head. You need to get these fundamentals right first before spending time on bias trap adjustments, and record head equalisation as mentioned in your later posts. You've said that playback is quite good, and that indicates that the Play Head Track and Azimuth are probably somewhere near ok. I'm assuming you haven't changed all the bias and record level settings - they must have been somewhere near appropriate previously. So hopefully, record level and bias, while not being optimal, should still be workable. So make sure the bias oscillator really is healthy, and then try adjustment of Record Head Track. You can adjust this so as to maximise the play back level of a low frequency high amplitude recording that you make - eg 400Hz at 0dB record level. Good luck Jim Regards John Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 14 15:56:12 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:56:12 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Nak 481 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <015301d493bd$2823e4d0$786bae70$@verizon.net> Hi Peter, when you hit the stop button it doesn't stop ? or when auto stop , stops the transport ? . I would work the record switch lever for the other problem dirty switches ? maybe both problems From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Peter Tanner via Naktalk Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 8:18 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Nak 481 Hi all, I have been reading with interest the posts on a 481. Since I have a 481Z I thought I'd ask a couple of questions. The deck's been playing well up to now but recently I've noticed the playback motor doesn't always stop when the transport is stopped. In other words the capstans are still moving when the cassette door is open and the playback is stopped. In the 480 series I understand the motors don't move in the stop mode unlike in the 580 series or other later decks. It also has an occasional other problem not sure if it's related. The other day while I put a cassette in to play the record light came on and off even though tabs on the cassette had been already removed. I stopped the play but somehow parts of the cassette was erased. Quite irritating. I then put in a blank tape with its tabs intact and kept playing and stopping several times, putting it in the record mode on and off and it has not done it since although the capstan motor still doesn't want to stop on occasions when everything is off. Any ideas? Thanks Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Dec 14 16:53:07 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 10:53:07 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE In-Reply-To: <014f01d493ba$6345b5a0$29d120e0$@verizon.net> References: <00ed01d49344$5b82e070$1288a150$@verizon.net> <014f01d493ba$6345b5a0$29d120e0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <016101d493c5$1bc2d220$53487660$@verizon.net> Got it ! it’s the supply side pinch roller assembly , it moves outward . I had already move this back in but it moved out a little . This time I was able to turn the plastic nut some , hopefully this will hold in place now. I was able to adjust the record head now .Made a test recording with music and it played back loud and clear . I think I will replace the other trimmers as I already did EX .. I've heard many times that the trim pots can be problematic in vintage gear . Then I'll take a crack at the calibration . Nice sounding deck so far , $5 well spent .Nothing like OJT . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 9:36 AM To: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Ok I shorted R310 (it wasn't originally ) and I now have 18.6v @ R311 just like the schematic . The erase head is working . I'm looking at the head block Its not engaging completely . This could be it why head adjustment is not working correctly , it only seems to effect one side . My first Nak repair ,learning a lot . -----Original Message----- From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 7:31 PM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: RE: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Hi John , I went back to pin#24 , I have 105KHz , 21VAC, 59.6VPP . I have 23.32vdc the bias voltage at IC401 and 17.08vdc at R311 and R301 junction . The voltages are low but not by much. Q301-Q303 are cool and no crazy voltages on them. I was having a problem setting the record height and azimuth (AC millivolt meters on #42 +) . So I adjusted the bias and record level while the deck was recording and watching the AC millivolt meters .I got one side record at 0db and plays back also at 0db, but the record level is full CCW . The other side not so good the signal is fluctuating . I tried to steady the signal with the bias and it helped a little but the AC millivolt meter needle is swaying back and forth . Do you think its tape and head contact ? I will check the tape path also . Thanks for your help John , I really appreciated it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:35 PM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 I miss this reply John , I'm on it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:26 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 Hi Jim Apologies for the delay in replying, and I'm doing a bit of catch-up here. Glad to see you're getting a 105KHz sine wave output from your bias oscillator, but the output level you report seems low. I would have expected more than 15Vrms - more like about 26Vrms at pin 24. So it might be wise for you to backtrack a little, and check to see that you're getting effective erasure, and that the DC Voltages measured in your bias oscillator are somewhere near the values shown on the schematic. The main power supply to the bias oscillator should be giving you 24V, and the voltage after R310 and R311 should be about 19V. Usually one of R311 and R310 is shorted - usually it's R310, the 39 Ohm resistor. Check with your fingers to see that the three transistors in the bias oscillator (Q301, Q302, Q303) aren't overheating. To check erasure, choose a recorded tape you don't mind erasing, and pass it though the machine in the record mode but with no record signal. Rewind, play, and see how well you've erased it. The things that are most likely to be giving you bad record results are.... 1. Incorrect Bias Level for the tape you're recording on. 2. Incorrect Record Level for the tape you're recording on. 3. Record Head misalignment - Track and Azimuth of the Record Head. You need to get these fundamentals right first before spending time on bias trap adjustments, and record head equalisation as mentioned in your later posts. You've said that playback is quite good, and that indicates that the Play Head Track and Azimuth are probably somewhere near ok. I'm assuming you haven't changed all the bias and record level settings - they must have been somewhere near appropriate previously. So hopefully, record level and bias, while not being optimal, should still be workable. So make sure the bias oscillator really is healthy, and then try adjustment of Record Head Track. You can adjust this so as to maximise the play back level of a low frequency high amplitude recording that you make - eg 400Hz at 0dB record level. Good luck Jim Regards John Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Dec 15 16:30:47 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 10:30:47 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE In-Reply-To: <016101d493c5$1bc2d220$53487660$@verizon.net> References: <00ed01d49344$5b82e070$1288a150$@verizon.net> <014f01d493ba$6345b5a0$29d120e0$@verizon.net> <016101d493c5$1bc2d220$53487660$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <011701d4948b$28a00e10$79e02a30$@twc.com> CONGRATULATIONS! Intelligence counts, but just plain dogged "don'tgiveitupness" slays the most dragons. Les Morgan -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 10:53 AM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Got it ! it’s the supply side pinch roller assembly , it moves outward . I had already move this back in but it moved out a little . This time I was able to turn the plastic nut some , hopefully this will hold in place now. I was able to adjust the record head now .Made a test recording with music and it played back loud and clear . I think I will replace the other trimmers as I already did EX .. I've heard many times that the trim pots can be problematic in vintage gear . Then I'll take a crack at the calibration . Nice sounding deck so far , $5 well spent .Nothing like OJT . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 9:36 AM To: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Ok I shorted R310 (it wasn't originally ) and I now have 18.6v @ R311 just like the schematic . The erase head is working . I'm looking at the head block Its not engaging completely . This could be it why head adjustment is not working correctly , it only seems to effect one side . My first Nak repair ,learning a lot . -----Original Message----- From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 7:31 PM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; 'John Gipps'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: RE: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 UPDATE Hi John , I went back to pin#24 , I have 105KHz , 21VAC, 59.6VPP . I have 23.32vdc the bias voltage at IC401 and 17.08vdc at R311 and R301 junction . The voltages are low but not by much. Q301-Q303 are cool and no crazy voltages on them. I was having a problem setting the record height and azimuth (AC millivolt meters on #42 +) . So I adjusted the bias and record level while the deck was recording and watching the AC millivolt meters .I got one side record at 0db and plays back also at 0db, but the record level is full CCW . The other side not so good the signal is fluctuating . I tried to steady the signal with the bias and it helped a little but the AC millivolt meter needle is swaying back and forth . Do you think its tape and head contact ? I will check the tape path also . Thanks for your help John , I really appreciated it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:35 PM To: 'John Gipps'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 I miss this reply John , I'm on it -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:26 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 3 Hi Jim Apologies for the delay in replying, and I'm doing a bit of catch-up here. Glad to see you're getting a 105KHz sine wave output from your bias oscillator, but the output level you report seems low. I would have expected more than 15Vrms - more like about 26Vrms at pin 24. So it might be wise for you to backtrack a little, and check to see that you're getting effective erasure, and that the DC Voltages measured in your bias oscillator are somewhere near the values shown on the schematic. The main power supply to the bias oscillator should be giving you 24V, and the voltage after R310 and R311 should be about 19V. Usually one of R311 and R310 is shorted - usually it's R310, the 39 Ohm resistor. Check with your fingers to see that the three transistors in the bias oscillator (Q301, Q302, Q303) aren't overheating. To check erasure, choose a recorded tape you don't mind erasing, and pass it though the machine in the record mode but with no record signal. Rewind, play, and see how well you've erased it. The things that are most likely to be giving you bad record results are.... 1. Incorrect Bias Level for the tape you're recording on. 2. Incorrect Record Level for the tape you're recording on. 3. Record Head misalignment - Track and Azimuth of the Record Head. You need to get these fundamentals right first before spending time on bias trap adjustments, and record head equalisation as mentioned in your later posts. You've said that playback is quite good, and that indicates that the Play Head Track and Azimuth are probably somewhere near ok. I'm assuming you haven't changed all the bias and record level settings - they must have been somewhere near appropriate previously. So hopefully, record level and bias, while not being optimal, should still be workable. So make sure the bias oscillator really is healthy, and then try adjustment of Record Head Track. You can adjust this so as to maximise the play back level of a low frequency high amplitude recording that you make - eg 400Hz at 0dB record level. Good luck Jim Regards John Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:54 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'John Gipps'" , Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 10 Message-ID: <009101d48c97$a00ffe20$e02ffa60$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using a 100MHz o-scope , I can see the sine wave and the digital read out is , 105KHz , 15.4vAC, 43.5 VPP , measurements taken from pin #24 right off the oscillator. The 4.7nF caps look good . ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Dec 16 02:23:48 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 01:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] T100 Log converter temperature drift References: <1134928874.5417178.1544923428213.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1134928874.5417178.1544923428213@mail.yahoo.com> Hello my new Nak-loving friends!I recently had the good fortune of acquiring a T100 Audio Analyzer in good condition.  I have been methodically going through it and getting it up to snuff.  I finished recapping all electrolytics and the few orange poly caps the machine had, and resolved some minor functional issues with oscillator frequency fine-tuning and a flickering display.I am now walking through the electrical adjustment guide in the service manual, and have been able to complete all of the procedures to get it fully tuned.  Actually it was not far out of calibration in most respects.  There remains one issue which I think needs attention.When performing the linear-to-log converter output span and zero adjustments I find what seems to be a temperature related drift in the right channel.  I set VR203 for an output value of 2.18v, and the value slowly inches upward over time.  The left channel settles in in a few seconds and doesn't move much after that, but, but the right one just continues to slowly drift, a millivolt at a time.  If I let the machine alone, it does eventually settle, but the moment I make an adjustment it is off again.  I did clean VR203 with deoxit, because the pot seems very twitchy.  It didn't help, and I will replace both of those pots with modern ones as soon as I find some.  I don't think that is what is causing the drift, though.My analog electronics skills are a bit rusty, and I can't say that I ever looked much at log amplifiers, even in the dim past.  I was just wondering if any of the experienced 'sparkies' in the group had any recommendations about what the culprit might be, short of going after it with a can of freeze spray?I would appreciate any guidance on the topic.Best regards,  Tom  -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Dec 18 17:18:49 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:18:49 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] 481 calibration Message-ID: <026601d496ed$5c9d1140$15d733c0$@verizon.net> I'll start a new thread for this. This 481 has new belts and tire , recapped (orange film & electrolytic ) and new trimmers . The deck now records on all 3 tape type settings . The playback of the recorded material is real close to the level of the original input . Being this my first NAK repair of this level mistakes were made . I should have had a better plan . I adjusted the trimmers and didn't make note of their original settings . I realize the SM is not a how-to manual so I have questions . I ran into a problem when I got to #13 of the adjustment chart. Its setting the 3mV bias and the 30mV record level . I wasn't sure what voltage I was seeing on my AC millivolt meters , and the playback wasn't right. So while in record I adjusted the bias and record level . I couldn't adjust the record level enough( to get the playback equal to the source) I would need to increase the bias and then adjust the record level again. So going from record to play and using the decks VU's to dictate to either increase or decrease the trimmers appeared to work . The input level was set at 0db and the playback on all 3 types is real close to that , by the decks VU's. I used a Maxell UR tape for all 3 , changing the EQ settings per SM. I do have other types of tapes , a Nak ZX reference blank tape to name one. So I'm not sure if the bias and record level is set correctly for the 3 types . Any suggestions ? This 481 is a 3 head deck but it doesn't have a tape/source switch , is that why you can't monitor what you're recording ? When you listen to a deck recording with a tape/source switch and in tape mode you're listing to the play head (playing the just recorded signal ) correct ? . On this 481 you hear the input signal when the deck is recording but not from the RH/PBH , that’s why I thought the deck was recording ,before I worked on it. I'm a hobbyist with no electronic background and since "they" don't teach this anymore I learn by doing , and asking a whole boat load of questions . I have had good results with Pioneer decks CT F 1250 ,1000 etc. Thanks From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 19 18:09:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] 481 calibration In-Reply-To: <026601d496ed$5c9d1140$15d733c0$@verizon.net> References: <026601d496ed$5c9d1140$15d733c0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <843565594.6770192.1545239399815@mail.yahoo.com> Increasing the record "bias" will not increase the record "level". Increasing the record bias will eliminate the high frequencies from the recording. Sounds like you have the SM so go in the order of the alignment procedure. Are you using calibration tapes? Also the Maxell "UR" tapes are only for general purpose recording. Music on those UR's will only be acceptable at best. I would use a better "normal bias" tape for aligning the "normal" settings. Without alignment tapes you can adjust bias this way and get pretty good results... Record from an FM radio NOT tuned to a station with the tuner's muting off so you get only "white noise" Record at -20db then play it back. Adjust the bias so the white noise sounds as close to the same as possible. Please note, important... you can only do this after all the levels are correct! You may have to go over the level and bias adjustment a couple times to get it dialed in. Also with dolby OFF. Make sure the heads are cleaned and demagged. Of course alignment tapes are the best way to go. You'll get it! Bob N From: calman46 via Naktalk To: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' ; 'John Gipps' ; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:20 AM Subject: [naktalk] 481 calibration I'll start a new thread for this.  This 481 has new belts and tire , recapped (orange film & electrolytic ) and new trimmers . The deck now records on all 3  tape type settings . The playback of the recorded material is real  close to the level of the original input . Being this my first NAK repair of this level mistakes were made . I should have had a better plan . I adjusted the trimmers and didn't make note of their original  settings . I realize the SM is not a how-to  manual so I have questions . I ran into a problem when I got to #13 of the adjustment chart. Its setting the 3mV bias and the 30mV record level  . I wasn't sure what  voltage  I was seeing on my AC millivolt meters , and  the playback wasn't right.  So while in record I  adjusted the bias and record level .  I couldn't adjust the record level enough( to get the playback equal to the source) I would need to increase the bias and then adjust the record level  again.  So going from record to play and using  the decks VU's  to dictate to either increase or  decrease the trimmers appeared to work . The input level was set at 0db and the playback on all 3 types is real close to that , by the decks VU's.  I used a Maxell UR tape for all 3 , changing the EQ settings per SM.    I do have other types of tapes , a Nak ZX  reference blank tape to name one. So I'm not sure if the bias and  record level is set correctly for the 3 types . Any suggestions ? This 481 is a 3 head deck but it doesn't have a tape/source switch , is that why you can't monitor what you're recording ?  When you listen to a deck recording with a tape/source  switch and in tape mode you're listing to the play head (playing the just recorded signal ) correct ? . On this 481 you hear the input signal when the deck is recording but not from the RH/PBH , that’s why I thought the deck was recording ,before I worked on it. I'm  a hobbyist with no  electronic background  and since "they" don't teach this anymore I learn by doing , and asking a whole boat load of questions . I have had good results with Pioneer  decks CT F 1250 ,1000 etc.  Thanks  ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 19 18:20:51 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (drucyphr via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:20:51 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Source for Sankyo back tension belt [BX300] Message-ID: Can anyone point me in the right direction? I am in need of a back tension back for a BX-300. I've read that SS3.2 from Consolidated Electronics works, as well as any similar sized belt from cheap kits on ebay. Does anyone have experience with these? Thanks and Happy Holidays to all of you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Dec 20 01:48:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:48:33 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] 481 calibration In-Reply-To: <843565594.6770192.1545239399815@mail.yahoo.com> References: <026601d496ed$5c9d1140$15d733c0$@verizon.net> <843565594.6770192.1545239399815@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <037b01d497fd$bce03f80$36a0be80$@verizon.net> I tried to calibrate each tape type per SM but the readings on the AC millivolt meter for the 3mV were not right . There wasn't enough adjustment on the record trimmers to bring the recorded signal up to 0b . Adjusting the bias and record level and observing the decks VU meters on playback now all 3 tape types playback at the same output as the original input signal 0db. This is the only way I could get results , I tried the SM steps many times with no luck . I recorded some music and it plays back just like the original . The NAK ZX tape I used sounds great , other tapes Maxell XLII and Sony EF good too . There is no real time record monitoring so white noise didn't work for me in this case. I may be able to tweak the bias a little but if I turn the trimmers to much it will affect the record level some . What do you think ? From: Bob Naylor [mailto:wotbob01 at yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 12:10 PM To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] 481 calibration Increasing the record "bias" will not increase the record "level". Increasing the record bias will eliminate the high frequencies from the recording. Sounds like you have the SM so go in the order of the alignment procedure. Are you using calibration tapes? Also the Maxell "UR" tapes are only for general purpose recording. Music on those UR's will only be acceptable at best. I would use a better "normal bias" tape for aligning the "normal" settings. Without alignment tapes you can adjust bias this way and get pretty good results... Record from an FM radio NOT tuned to a station with the tuner's muting off so you get only "white noise" Record at -20db then play it back. Adjust the bias so the white noise sounds as close to the same as possible. Please note, important... you can only do this after all the levels are correct! You may have to go over the level and bias adjustment a couple times to get it dialed in. Also with dolby OFF. Make sure the heads are cleaned and demagged. Of course alignment tapes are the best way to go. You'll get it! Bob N _____ From: calman46 via Naktalk To: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' ; 'John Gipps' ; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:20 AM Subject: [naktalk] 481 calibration I'll start a new thread for this. This 481 has new belts and tire , recapped (orange film & electrolytic ) and new trimmers . The deck now records on all 3 tape type settings . The playback of the recorded material is real close to the level of the original input Being this my first NAK repair of this level mistakes were made . I should have had a better plan . I adjusted the trimmers and didn't make note of their original settings . I realize the SM is not a how-to manual so I have questions . I ran into a problem when I got to #13 of the adjustment chart. Its setting the 3mV bias and the 30mV record level . I wasn't sure what voltage I was seeing on my AC millivolt meters , and the playback wasn't right. So while in record I adjusted the bias and record level . I couldn't adjust the record level enough( to get the playback equal to the source) I would need to increase the bias and then adjust the record level again. So going from record to play and using the decks VU's to dictate to either increase or decrease the trimmers appeared to work . The input level was set at 0db and the playback on all 3 types is real close to that , by the decks VU's. I used a Maxell UR tape for all 3 , changing the EQ settings per SM. I do have other types of tapes , a Nak ZX reference blank tape to name one. So I'm not sure if the bias and record level is set correctly for the 3 types . Any suggestions ? This 481 is a 3 head deck but it doesn't have a tape/source switch , is that why you can't monitor what you're recording ? When you listen to a deck recording with a tape/source switch and in tape mode you're listing to the play head (playing the just recorded signal ) correct ? . On this 481 you hear the input signal when the deck is recording but not from the RH/PBH , that’s why I thought the deck was recording ,before I worked on it. I'm a hobbyist with no electronic background and since "they" don't teach this anymore I learn by doing , and asking a whole boat load of questions . I have had good results with Pioneer decks CT F 1250 ,1000 etc. Thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Dec 25 23:49:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 22:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Wow & Flutter, Do new rubber parts need a break-in period? References: <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641@mail.yahoo.com> Hello and Happy Holidays to all,I recently put all new belts, idler and pinch rollers on a Nak 480 deck.  Parts were from what I believe to be reputable sources.  Wow and Flutter weighted, peak and rms as measured by Alex Freed's WFGUI program actually went up by about 50% with the new parts, from what was in before.  Swapping parts back and forth it seems as though most of it is the pinch rollers, which were moderately worn, and the capstan belt seems a moderate contributor as well.  I am surprised by this, but am a bit of a beginner with this stuff.  Do these parts need to break-in in order to get to optimal W&F performance, or is it simply a matter of not being able to match the original Nak spec on rubber parts?Thanks in advance,  Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 26 02:19:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 19:19:38 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Wow & Flutter, Do new rubber parts need a break-in period? In-Reply-To: <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: The capstan belt is the most critical part regarding W&F in a Nak classic transport.  I have had bad belts from PRB in the past.  The best belt I have found so far is one from Fred Marrs. They are a bit pricey and can be slow for delivery, but his belt came closest to the original belt for performance.  I measure W&F using a Sound Technology 1510, a very accurate test set. You might try "breaking it in" for a few hours, it might improve, but a lot relies on the quality of that particular rubber part, it needs to have a very consistent thickness, width, friction coefficient and the correct material. On 12/25/18 4:49 PM, Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk wrote: > Hello and Happy Holidays to all, > I recently put all new belts, idler and pinch rollers on a Nak 480 > deck.  Parts were from what I believe to be reputable sources.  Wow > and Flutter weighted, peak and rms as measured by Alex Freed's WFGUI > program actually went up by about 50% with the new parts, from what > was in before.  Swapping parts back and forth it seems as though most > of it is the pinch rollers, which were moderately worn, and the > capstan belt seems a moderate contributor as well.  I am surprised by > this, but am a bit of a beginner with this stuff.  Do these parts need > to break-in in order to get to optimal W&F performance, or is it > simply a matter of not being able to match the original Nak spec on > rubber parts? > Thanks in advance,  Tom > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 26 06:53:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Andrew via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 08:53:26 +0300 Subject: [naktalk] Wow & Flutter, Do new rubber parts need a break-in period? In-Reply-To: <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1868730452.9999592.1545778143641@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hello, Tom. I cannot say exactly but I don't think they need a "warm-up". Quality rubber parts should be already in good condition once you installed them. But there maybe different reasons why you get heightened W&F like very strict specifications, non-ideal new parts, wear of other parts in the transport or capstan motor speed issues. 2018-12-26 1:49 GMT+03:00, Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk : > Hello and Happy Holidays to all,I recently put all new belts, idler and > pinch rollers on a Nak 480 deck.  Parts were from what I believe to be > reputable sources.  Wow and Flutter weighted, peak and rms as measured by > Alex Freed's WFGUI program actually went up by about 50% with the new parts, > from what was in before.  Swapping parts back and forth it seems as though > most of it is the pinch rollers, which were moderately worn, and the capstan > belt seems a moderate contributor as well.  I am surprised by this, but am a > bit of a beginner with this stuff.  Do these parts need to break-in in order > to get to optimal W&F performance, or is it simply a matter of not being > able to match the original Nak spec on rubber parts?Thanks in advance,  Tom From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Dec 26 23:40:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Wiedmann via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Wow & Flutter, Do new rubber parts need a break-in period? References: <408766907.10401899.1545864018288.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <408766907.10401899.1545864018288@mail.yahoo.com> Thank you for the responses, Andrew and Fran.  So where do most of you get your pinch rollers?  I have tried several different sources.  They don't seem too different from one another, but they do perform worse than the ones that were in the machine to begin with.  I replaced all the rubber on this machine because I wanted to start with fresh parts.  The rollers that were in the machine were moderately worn but not that bad.  They were not cracked or gummy, just grooved a bit.  Replacing them with new seemed to degrade the W&F the most.  I used a PRB belt and that made a little bit of negative difference, just measurable, when compared to the old.  I measured .04 weighted RMS / .07 peak before my 'upgrade' and am now at 0.06 RMS / .12, right at or over the Nak spec limit with all parts replaced with new.  Seems I should have just left well enough alone, but it seemed directionally correct to replace all rubber parts.  I have a pretty decent ear, and I believe I can actually hear that difference in music played over the machine.  Should I just go on using the old parts?  I would prefer to start with new parts, so they will last, because I plan to pass this deck on to someone else, but not if it means that much worse performance. Thank you all for your help.  This is a great forum, and I love that there is such a community dedicated to these machines that we love. Tom Message: 3 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 08:53:26 +0300 From: Andrew via Naktalk To: Tom Wiedmann ,  Talk about Nakamichi     Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Wow & Flutter,    Do new rubber parts need a     break-in period? Message-ID:     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, Tom. I cannot say exactly but I don't think they need a "warm-up". Quality rubber parts should be already in good condition once you installed them. But there maybe different reasons why you get heightened W&F like very strict specifications, non-ideal new parts, wear of other parts in the transport or capstan motor speed issues. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-1.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 14:28:44 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 08:28:44 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery Message-ID: If the battery is replaced with a typical coin battery holder, which are typically only two posts, a hole must be drilledin the matching part of the circuit. I install them all the time. If the deck does not lose power, then the battery is totally unnecessary. On the CR-5 especially it does very little. It was not a lot of trouble for Nak because, IIRC, the actual PCB design is identical to the CR-7. I absolutely guarantee that if the soldered in battery is still on the deck, it is shot. I would clip it out at the very least before the battery leaks and corrodes the PCB. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 15:01:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 14:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1341800048.8703375.1514988061053@mail.yahoo.com> Perry, I home-made a coin battery holder with leads so from now on it can be replaced easier. I have an idler tire on it's way which I hope to get this week. This CR-5 is always plugged into a power strip so unless I lose the mains due to a storm or whatever it will always have power. The power switch is not always on, it just always has the 120 volts AC. I also thought about just eliminating that coin battery completely. Still debating about that. Thank you. Bob N From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 5:31 AM Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery If the battery is replaced with a typical coin battery holder, which are typically only two posts, a hole must be drilled  in the matching part of the circuit. I install them all the time. If the deck does not lose power, then the battery is totally unnecessary. On the CR-5 especially it does very little. It was not a lot of trouble for Nak because, IIRC, the actual PCB design is identical to the CR-7. I absolutely guarantee that if the soldered in battery is still on the deck, it is shot. I would clip it out at the very least before the battery leaks and corrodes the PCB. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 15:24:14 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 15:24:14 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: <1341800048.8703375.1514988061053@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> Possible solution  :-) Ingemar -------- Originalmeddelande --------Från: Bob Naylor via Naktalk Datum: 2018-01-03 15:01 (GMT+01:00) Till: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery Perry, I home-made a coin battery holder with leads so from now on it can be replaced easier. I have an idler tire on it's way which I hope to get this week. This CR-5 is always plugged into a power strip so unless I lose the mains due to a storm or whatever it will always have power. The power switch is not always on, it just always has the 120 volts AC. I also thought about just eliminating that coin battery completely. Still debating about that. Thank you. Bob N From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 5:31 AM Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery If the battery is replaced with a typical coin battery holder, which are typically only two posts, a hole must be drilled  in the matching part of the circuit. I install them all the time. If the deck does not lose power, then the battery is totally unnecessary. On the CR-5 especially it does very little. It was not a lot of trouble for Nak because, IIRC, the actual PCB design is identical to the CR-7. I absolutely guarantee that if the soldered in battery is still on the deck, it is shot. I would clip it out at the very least before the battery leaks and corrodes the PCB. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20180103_152226.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1516779 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 15:57:53 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 15:57:53 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> Not bad! Seriously, would someone have a URL where to find a battery holder that can be soldered on CR-5&7 on which you could clip a new battery ? Happy New Year to Naktalkers Bernard Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk a écrit : > Possible solution :-) > > > > Ingemar > > > -------- Originalmeddelande -------- > Från: Bob Naylor via Naktalk > Datum: 2018-01-03 15:01 (GMT+01:00) > Till: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette > Decks > Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery > > Perry, I home-made a coin battery holder with leads so from now on it > can be replaced easier. I have an idler tire on it's way which I hope > to get this week. This CR-5 is always plugged into a power strip so > unless I lose the mains due to a storm or whatever it will always have > power. The power switch is not always on, it just always has the 120 > volts AC. I also thought about just eliminating that coin battery > completely. Still debating about that. > > Thank you. Bob N > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* perry via Naktalk > *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 3, 2018 5:31 AM > *Subject:* [naktalk] CR-5 Battery > > If the battery is replaced with a typical coin battery holder, which > are typically only two posts, a hole must be drilled in the matching > part of the circuit. I install them all the time. If the deck does not > lose power, then the battery is totally unnecessary. On the CR-5 > especially it does very little. It was not a lot of trouble for Nak > because, IIRC, the actual PCB design is identical to the CR-7. I > absolutely guarantee that if the soldered in battery is still on the > deck, it is shot. I would clip it out at the very least before the > battery leaks and corrodes the PCB. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com > mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 18:14:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:14:18 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> Message-ID: Google is a good information source at instances like this. I am not sure what kind of coin battery there is in the Naka CR5, but I tested with battery type CR2032: https://www.google.se/search?q=holder+CR2032&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAi8b_pLzYAhUMEJoKHcekCwYQsAQIhAI&biw=1280&bih=918 Ingemar Virusfritt. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> 2018-01-03 15:57 GMT+01:00 bb : > Not bad! > > Seriously, would someone have a URL where to find a battery holder that > can be soldered on CR-5&7 on which you could clip a new battery ? > > Happy New Year to Naktalkers > > Bernard > > Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk a écrit : > >> Possible solution :-) >> >> >> >> Ingemar >> >> >> -------- Originalmeddelande -------- >> Från: Bob Naylor via Naktalk >> Datum: 2018-01-03 15:01 (GMT+01:00) >> Till: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >> >> Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery >> >> Perry, I home-made a coin battery holder with leads so from now on it can >> be replaced easier. I have an idler tire on it's way which I hope to get >> this week. This CR-5 is always plugged into a power strip so unless I lose >> the mains due to a storm or whatever it will always have power. The power >> switch is not always on, it just always has the 120 volts AC. I also >> thought about just eliminating that coin battery completely. Still debating >> about that. >> >> Thank you. Bob N >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* perry via Naktalk >> *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 3, 2018 5:31 AM >> *Subject:* [naktalk] CR-5 Battery >> >> If the battery is replaced with a typical coin battery holder, which are >> typically only two posts, a hole must be drilled in the matching part of >> the circuit. I install them all the time. If the deck does not lose power, >> then the battery is totally unnecessary. On the CR-5 especially it does >> very little. It was not a lot of trouble for Nak because, IIRC, the actual >> PCB design is identical to the CR-7. I absolutely guarantee that if the >> soldered in battery is still on the deck, it is shot. I would clip it out >> at the very least before the battery leaks and corrodes the PCB. >> >> Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App >> ========---------------------------------------------------- >> -----========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com < >> http://wiki.naks.com/> >> ========---------------------------------------------------- >> -----========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com > Naktalk at lists.naks.com> mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ >> listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------- >> -----========= >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------- >> -----========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------- >> -----========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ >> listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------- >> -----========= >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 18:38:43 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Willy Hermann via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:38:43 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> Message-ID: Or -- just a thought -- you could order the correct replacement solder-in battery to keep the deck like new. Mouser part number 614-CR2032RH1-MFR Willy ​ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 21:08:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 20:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> Message-ID: <622029465.8988891.1515010080756@mail.yahoo.com> Keeping it original has been in the back of my mind also but keeping it original is not that important to me. Ease of replacement in the future was what I was thinking. We'll see. Thanks for the part number.Happy new year!Bob N From: Willy Hermann via Naktalk To: Ingemar Lindqvist ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 9:38 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery Or -- just a thought -- you could order the correct replacement solder-in battery to keep the deck like new.  Mouser part number  614-CR2032RH1-MFRWilly​========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 3 21:55:57 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 21:55:57 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5A4D435D.1080409@gmail.com> Hi Willy, Even did not think it could exist! Now, this part is in front of my mind... Thank you to all, that seems to be a good New Year beginning. All the best Bernard Willy Hermann via Naktalk a écrit : > Or -- just a thought -- you could order the correct replacement > solder-in battery to keep the deck like new. > Mouser part number 614-CR2032RH1-MFR > Willy > ​ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 09:54:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 09:54:16 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 Battery In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> Well, after checking, it is only available in the USA...not at Mouser France Willy Hermann via Naktalk a écrit : > Or -- just a thought -- you could order the correct replacement > solder-in battery to keep the deck like new. > Mouser part number 614-CR2032RH1-MFR > Willy > ​ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 17:15:06 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> Message-ID: <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away would be greatly appreciated. Happy new year all. Bob N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 18:22:12 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (martin ferreira via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:22:12 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com>,<259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape to it so it doesn't fly away Martin Ferreira ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away would be greatly appreciated. Happy new year all. Bob N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 18:36:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:36:45 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller. I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 18:52:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk To: martin ferreira ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller.  I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >          Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >                        Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 19:06:41 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (martin ferreira via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:06:41 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> , <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Bob. i have tried it both ways but found that just removing the entire wheel was easier for me. Martin Ferreira ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:52 PM To: Francis Flynn; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N ________________________________ From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk To: martin ferreira ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller. I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk > wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk > on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 19:16:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (martin ferreira via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:16:09 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> , <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: It must be added that before removing the entire wheel, you must SUPPORT the assembly or it may break. What I do is (with deck standing up) place some popsicle sticks cut small, or thick toothpicks behind the assembly cross-wise to support the idler holder. To remove the sticks, i then prick them with a sharp knife to lift them. I would recommend this support technique even in the other method. Martin Ferreira ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:52 PM To: Francis Flynn; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N ________________________________ From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk To: martin ferreira ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller. I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk > wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk > on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 19:24:29 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Samuel Crider via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:24:29 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Been there lost that. Put the red permanent marker to it prior to removal. And then massage a strip of scotch tape over it. Which usually stops it from launching during removal. On Jan 4, 2018 11:23 AM, "martin ferreira via Naktalk" < naktalk at lists.naks.com> wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent > tape to it so it doesn't fly away > > > *Martin Ferreira* > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor > via Naktalk > *Sent:* Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > *To:* bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > *Subject:* [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 4 21:16:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Richard L. Hess via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:16:01 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <0a2799c9-6fbe-d3cf-02a0-607ddf9d649d@richardhess.com> I broke a Dragon idler arm trying to do that. Take the wheel off. Fortunately, I had a spare. Now I don't have a spare. On 2018-01-04 11:15 AM, Bob Naylor via Naktalk wrote: > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've > only removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > -- Richard L. Hess email: richard at richardhess.com Aurora, Ontario, Canada http://www.richardhess.com/ http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 5 14:14:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 08:14:04 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] CR-5 tire Message-ID: A red sharpie to mark it is a good idea, and for the newbs doing this, cellophane tape, cut in a circle to not overhang the hub will keep it in place. I always remove the hub as well, as working in that tiny space with the tension of the tire is courting a broken idler tire arm. As long as you grasp the tire firmly and hold it steady with no down or up force, then a small sharp screwdriver will easily pierce the tape and get under the washer. The idea is to have a screwdriver small enough that it is sharp but wide enough so that you can twist the blade under the washer and standup stretch the washer over the shaft. The technique is important. Do NOT try to pry the washer using the screwdriver like a lever. That is more likely to break the arm. When you use the blade Twist Method, the pressure is applied at the base of the hub,near the shaft, where it is strongest. The washer will “stand up” under the screwdriver blade and come right off.Once the new tire is on, cut another circle of tape, and use that same screwdriver to push the washer straight down over the shaft, again firmly holding the tire with tape assuring the washer will not pop away. Clean the tire after you are done. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 5 16:50:06 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1042172684.1050678.1515167406343@mail.yahoo.com> I fully agree. Trying to replace the tire in-situ poses the risk of breaking the tiny plastic arm that carries the idler. That's an irreparable part that it's practically impossible to obtain a replacement for. OTOH, removing the idler carries the risk of losing the tiny washer that secures the idler in place. That's no big deal. I find that stuffing the cassette well with a piece of rag before idler removal prevents the disappearance of that washer from sight. Never lost it since the only time I did  :-). -- Ron From: martin ferreira via Naktalk To: Bob Naylor ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 1:20 PM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire #yiv9976476865 #yiv9976476865 -- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv9976476865 Bob.i have tried it both ways but found that just removing the entire wheel was easier for me. Martin Ferreira From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:52 PM To: Francis Flynn; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk To: martin ferreira ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller.  I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >          Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >                        Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 5 17:22:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Birger Glosimot via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:22:59 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <1042172684.1050678.1515167406343@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> <1042172684.1050678.1515167406343@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <000501d38641$73b05ad0$5b111070$@tilkoblet.net> Sankyo idler on Nakamichi is very easy. As described use adhesive tape and pull the idler retainer clip of with a small hook, or the entire idler wheel. For reassembly after putting a ned idler rubber on, I first put on the idler wheel and with the retainer on the adhesive tape, sometimes I make a hole in the tape over the retainer centre. Then place the retainer on the aisle? And push down. But idler change on the classic transport, might be much work! Right now I try to reposition the idler wheel on a LX-5 ☹ Any GOOD! Instruction to that easy? (try not to cut the wire strips so I can easily slid back on the guides for the two alu covers. (excuse my English if there are some bad spelling) Birger (Notodden in Norway) Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av Ron via Naktalk Sendt: fredag 5. januar 2018 16.50 Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Emne: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire I fully agree. Trying to replace the tire in-situ poses the risk of breaking the tiny plastic arm that carries the idler. That's an irreparable part that it's practically impossible to obtain a replacement for. OTOH, removing the idler carries the risk of losing the tiny washer that secures the idler in place. That's no big deal. I find that stuffing the cassette well with a piece of rag before idler removal prevents the disappearance of that washer from sight. Never lost it since the only time I did :-). -- Ron _____ From: martin ferreira via Naktalk > To: Bob Naylor >; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 1:20 PM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Bob. i have tried it both ways but found that just removing the entire wheel was easier for me. Martin Ferreira _____ From: Naktalk > on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:52 PM To: Francis Flynn; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N _____ From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk > To: martin ferreira >; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller. I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk > wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk > on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 5 17:07:57 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (martin ferreira via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:07:57 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: <1042172684.1050678.1515167406343@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> , <1042172684.1050678.1515167406343@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: in case of lost washer, a replacement can be made out of thin plastic like from an overhead transparency or one of similar thickness just cut or punch a small circle or square and pierce a hole in the middle. worth a try if no spares available. Martin Ferreira ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of Ron via Naktalk Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 3:50 PM To: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire I fully agree. Trying to replace the tire in-situ poses the risk of breaking the tiny plastic arm that carries the idler. That's an irreparable part that it's practically impossible to obtain a replacement for. OTOH, removing the idler carries the risk of losing the tiny washer that secures the idler in place. That's no big deal. I find that stuffing the cassette well with a piece of rag before idler removal prevents the disappearance of that washer from sight. Never lost it since the only time I did :-). -- Ron ________________________________ From: martin ferreira via Naktalk > To: Bob Naylor >; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 1:20 PM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Bob. i have tried it both ways but found that just removing the entire wheel was easier for me. Martin Ferreira ________________________________ From: Naktalk > on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:52 PM To: Francis Flynn; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N ________________________________ From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk > To: martin ferreira >; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller. I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk > wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk > on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 5 18:31:06 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Terra Mail via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:31:06 -0200 Subject: [naktalk] Offer Message-ID: <006c01d3864a$fa8098f0$ef81cad0$@terra.com.br> Dear All, I’d like to offer 04 Nakamichi decks that I intend to sell: 1- CR5 in 100V-60Hz(Japan model) 2- 2 x CR4 one is 100V-60Hz(Japan model) and other 220V-50-60Hz(Germany model) 3- Bx-2 for 120V-60Hz(US model) Both are in very good shape and working well. Those that have interesting please let me know and I will send photos or videos that prove that working well. Atenciosamente | Saludos | Best regards | Mit freundlichen Grüssen ; Eng.Marcelo Mansour Rua Senador Queiros, 165 Santo Andre- São Paulo-09050300-Brazil Phone/Fax:55-11-4425-4245 Cell:55-11-96831-5151 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Jan 6 03:05:28 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 02:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire In-Reply-To: References: <5a4ce793.46402e0a.29312.17d9@mx.google.com> <5A4CEF71.3020505@gmail.com> <5A4DEBB8.9050001@gmail.com> <259533979.423001.1515082506648@mail.yahoo.com> <134283925.488431.1515088342071@mail.yahoo.com> <1042172684.1050678.1515167406343@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1951565323.1453560.1515204328610@mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, I got it pretty easily. Good light and my reading glasses did the trick. The CR-5 works like a champ again!Thank you everyone for all of your help. Reading everyone's e'mails made me feel comfortable doing this. The little microscopic washer/clip is what worried me. Happy New Year everyone! Bob N From: martin ferreira via Naktalk To: Ron ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 8:25 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire #yiv2283938921 #yiv2283938921 -- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv2283938921 in case of lost washer, a replacement can be made out of thin plastic like from an overhead transparency or one of similar thicknessjust cut or punch a small circle or square and pierce a hole in the middle. worth a try if no spares available. Martin Ferreira From: Naktalk on behalf of Ron via Naktalk Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 3:50 PM To: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire  I fully agree. Trying to replace the tire in-situ poses the risk of breaking the tiny plastic arm that carries the idler. That's an irreparable part that it's practically impossible to obtain a replacement for. OTOH, removing the idler carries the risk of losing the tiny washer that secures the idler in place. That's no big deal. I find that stuffing the cassette well with a piece of rag before idler removal prevents the disappearance of that washer from sight. Never lost it since the only time I did  :-). -- Ron From: martin ferreira via Naktalk To: Bob Naylor ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 1:20 PM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Bob.i have tried it both ways but found that just removing the entire wheel was easier for me. Martin Ferreira From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:52 PM To: Francis Flynn; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Martin, I wondered about that and why all the instructions have you taking the entire wheel off? Have you done it this way? Bob N From: Francis Flynn via Naktalk To: martin ferreira ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Idler tire Don't take the retainer clip off, just take the rubber tire off from the idler roller.  I use a small metal pick or small screwdriver. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, martin ferreira via Naktalk wrote: > i colour it red so I can see it easily and then stick some transparent tape > to it so it doesn't fly away > > > Martin Ferreira > > > ________________________________ > From: Naktalk on behalf of Bob Naylor via > Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:15 PM > To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] Idler tire > > I got my new idler tire for this CR-5. I've never done this job, I've only > removed the plate to get access to the tire for cleaning. > > Holy cow is that new clip small! I can see if it's dropped it may never be > found so I guess I'll stand the deck on it's back and think of some way to > keep it from falling into the deck or onto the floor. > > Hopefully I'll get at it this weekend. > > Any hints for what you guys do to keep that clip/washer from running away > would be greatly appreciated. > > Happy new year all. > > Bob N > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >          Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >                        Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Jan 6 22:35:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 13:35:16 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Available Tri Tracer corded remote Message-ID: I would like to make available to all Naktalk members a corded Tri-tracer remote control unit. I bought this several years ago @ a long defunct dealer in Seattle called Seattle Stereo (if memory serves), when I had a 700 but I never got around to using it and the 700 is long gone (I still have a CD-1 & a CD 1.5). This remote has been sitting on a shelf in my equipment rack for ca. 20 years and I'd like to make it available to someone who can use it. Thanks in advance. H.A.Beddoe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 7 12:51:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rodrigo via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:51:00 -0200 Subject: [naktalk] Available Tri Tracer corded remote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9736264B-4D7A-4B9E-BC18-A0FDA4EE0B77@terra.com.br> Hi Herb, I have a 700 II. If it is for this deck I’d be interested in yours! Let me know what you want for it. My email is at the bottom of this message if you’d prefer to talk privately. Have a great week! Rodrigo Krause dos Santos Rocha rksr59 at terra.com.br Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Jan 2018, at 19:35, Herb Beddoe via Naktalk wrote: > > I would like to make available to all Naktalk members a corded Tri-tracer remote control unit. I bought this several years ago @ a long defunct dealer in Seattle called Seattle Stereo (if memory serves), when I had a 700 but I never got around to using it and the 700 is long gone (I still have a CD-1 & a CD 1.5). This remote has been sitting on a shelf in my equipment rack for ca. 20 years and I'd like to make it available to someone who can use it. > > Thanks in advance. > > H.A.Beddoe > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 7 13:50:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 07:50:18 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Tri tracer corded remote Message-ID: I would be interested. How do I contact you? Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 7 17:11:54 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 10:11:54 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <01fd01d387d2$3c0e7a20$b42b6e60$@net> H.A. - can you tell us the model number and what are you looking to get for this? I may have some interest. MRL -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of via Naktalk Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2018 5:00 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 4 Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to naktalk at lists.naks.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to naktalk-request at lists.naks.com You can reach the person managing the list at naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." Naktalk digest mailing list Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, don't go with digest mode. If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. Today's Topics: 1. Available Tri Tracer corded remote (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 13:35:16 -0800 From: Herb Beddoe via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Available Tri Tracer corded remote Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I would like to make available to all Naktalk members a corded Tri-tracer remote control unit. I bought this several years ago @ a long defunct dealer in Seattle called Seattle Stereo (if memory serves), when I had a 700 but I never got around to using it and the 700 is long gone (I still have a CD-1 & a CD 1.5). This remote has been sitting on a shelf in my equipment rack for ca. 20 years and I'd like to make it available to someone who can use it. Thanks in advance. H.A.Beddoe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ------------------------------ End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 4 *************************************** From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 7 19:19:48 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron & Marion Heuer via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 13:19:48 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 4 In-Reply-To: <01fd01d387d2$3c0e7a20$b42b6e60$@net> References: <01fd01d387d2$3c0e7a20$b42b6e60$@net> Message-ID: Hi, There is a guy on eBay that sells wireless remotes for all Nak decks with a din plug in the rear of the deck. Works great. Ron Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk wrote: > > H.A. - can you tell us the model number and what are you looking to get for this? I may have some interest. > > MRL > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of via Naktalk > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2018 5:00 AM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 4 > > Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to > naktalk at lists.naks.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." > > > Naktalk digest mailing list > > Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, don't go with digest mode. > > If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. > > Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Available Tri Tracer corded remote (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 13:35:16 -0800 > From: Herb Beddoe via Naktalk > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: [naktalk] Available Tri Tracer corded remote > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I would like to make available to all Naktalk members a corded Tri-tracer remote control unit. I bought this several years ago @ a long defunct dealer in Seattle called Seattle Stereo (if memory serves), when I had a > 700 but I never got around to using it and the 700 is long gone (I still have a CD-1 & a CD 1.5). This remote has been sitting on a shelf in my equipment rack for ca. 20 years and I'd like to make it available to someone who can use it. > > Thanks in advance. > > H.A.Beddoe > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 4 > *************************************** > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jan 8 20:17:27 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:17:27 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Tri Tracer corded remote. Message-ID: To: all interested parties: Thanks for your interest! The remote has no part Numbers (nor any other numbers) on it It simply says "tri tracer remote" on the front and "made in Japan on the rear" I bought it 20 some odd years ago for a 700 Tri Tracer & as I remember I tried it with that deck to make sure it worked and never used it again having moved from the 700 to a ZX9 shortly after. If your deck has a 7 pin DIN plug on the rear I see no reason why it would not work with your deck. All of the previous being said I think I have it sold to Rodrigo as he was the first to contact me. Best Regards, Arthur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 9 18:52:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:52:05 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <07AFC03B-4F8F-4D6F-8CB0-CB4D3A7C5609@charter.net> I don't think that is true as I responded first and shortly after it was posted. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: > > Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to > naktalk at lists.naks.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." > > > Naktalk digest mailing list > > Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to > get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, > don't go with digest mode. > > If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. > > Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Tri Tracer corded remote. (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:17:27 -0800 > From: Herb Beddoe via Naktalk > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: [naktalk] Tri Tracer corded remote. > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > To: all interested parties: > > Thanks for your interest! > > The remote has no part Numbers (nor any other numbers) on it It simply says > "tri tracer remote" on the front and "made in Japan on the rear" > > I bought it 20 some odd years ago for a 700 Tri Tracer & as I remember I > tried it with that deck to make sure it worked and never used it again > having moved from the 700 to a ZX9 shortly after. If your deck has a 7 pin > DIN plug on the rear I see no reason why it would not work with your deck. > > All of the previous being said I think I have it sold to Rodrigo as he was > the first to contact me. > > Best Regards, Arthur > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 > *************************************** From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 9 23:59:31 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (mech986 via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:59:31 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 In-Reply-To: <07AFC03B-4F8F-4D6F-8CB0-CB4D3A7C5609@charter.net> References: <07AFC03B-4F8F-4D6F-8CB0-CB4D3A7C5609@charter.net> Message-ID: Hi Michael, Unless you emailed directly, you need to look at the NAKtalk January archives to see the message time stamps. Actually Rodrigo and Perry both have reply messages at 12:50 and 13:51 CET in before your reply message at 17:11 CET. In any case, any seller, IMO, always reserves right to sell to whomever they wish, many times on basis of private info or decisions not always publicly known or shown to the rest of us unless it is on a selling site with strict rules or restrictions on transactions. just my 0.02. Regards, Bartley Yee La Habra, CA. Sent from my iPad > On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk wrote: > > I don't think that is true as I responded first and shortly after it was posted. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: >> From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 10 16:52:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:52:33 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: greetings Naktalkers: Bartley is correct (many thanks Bartley) Rodrigo's email/offer was the first I received & in fact we already had an agreement by the time I received another inquiry. On Jan 10, 2018 3:00 AM, "via Naktalk" wrote: > Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to > naktalk at lists.naks.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." > > > Naktalk digest mailing list > > Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is > to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to > get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, > don't go with digest mode. > > If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the > digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply > message... you really need to know what you are doing. > > Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these > precautions may get discarded. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 > (Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk) > 2. Re: Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 (mech986 via Naktalk) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:52:05 -0600 > From: "Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk" > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com, naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 > Message-ID: <07AFC03B-4F8F-4D6F-8CB0-CB4D3A7C5609 at charter.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > I don't think that is true as I responded first and shortly after it was > posted. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: > > > > Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to > > naktalk at lists.naks.com > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." > > > > > > Naktalk digest mailing list > > > > Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion > is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to > > get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. > Otherwise, > > don't go with digest mode. > > > > If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove > the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply > message... you really need to know what you are doing. > > > > Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these > precautions may get discarded. > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Tri Tracer corded remote. (Herb Beddoe via Naktalk) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:17:27 -0800 > > From: Herb Beddoe via Naktalk > > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > > Subject: [naktalk] Tri Tracer corded remote. > > Message-ID: > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > To: all interested parties: > > > > Thanks for your interest! > > > > The remote has no part Numbers (nor any other numbers) on it It simply > says > > "tri tracer remote" on the front and "made in Japan on the rear" > > > > I bought it 20 some odd years ago for a 700 Tri Tracer & as I remember I > > tried it with that deck to make sure it worked and never used it again > > having moved from the 700 to a ZX9 shortly after. If your deck has a 7 > pin > > DIN plug on the rear I see no reason why it would not work with your > deck. > > > > All of the previous being said I think I have it sold to Rodrigo as he > was > > the first to contact me. > > > > Best Regards, Arthur > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: attachments/20180108/bea960ae/attachment-0001.html> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Subject: Digest Footer > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ > listinfo/naktalk > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 > > *************************************** > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:59:31 -0800 > From: mech986 via Naktalk > To: "Michael R. Lemke" , Talk about Nakamichi > Cassette Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 6 > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi Michael, > > Unless you emailed directly, you need to look at the NAKtalk January > archives to see the message time stamps. Actually Rodrigo and Perry both > have reply messages at 12:50 and 13:51 CET in before your reply message at > 17:11 CET. > > In any case, any seller, IMO, always reserves right to sell to whomever > they wish, many times on basis of private info or decisions not always > publicly known or shown to the rest of us unless it is on a selling site > with strict rules or restrictions on transactions. > > just my 0.02. > > Regards, > > Bartley Yee > La Habra, CA. > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Michael R. Lemke via Naktalk < > naktalk at lists.naks.com> wrote: > > > > I don't think that is true as I responded first and shortly after it was > posted. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: > >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 7 > *************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 10 23:38:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:38:33 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Patty Message-ID: <20180110163833.fml7xkabo08k0k88@webmail.sasktel.net> Patty, are you still out there? Do you still have that TD-700 cleaning flap ?   Cheers, Rainer S. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 10 23:45:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Patty via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:45:42 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] Patty In-Reply-To: <20180110163833.fml7xkabo08k0k88@webmail.sasktel.net> References: <20180110163833.fml7xkabo08k0k88@webmail.sasktel.net> Message-ID: YES I DO.... GONNA COST LOTSSSSSSS LMAO PATTY BERETTA PURCHASING/SALES 1815 S ANDERSON AVE COMPTON CA 90220 310-639-2424 -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 2:39 PM To: Naktalk Subject: [naktalk] Patty Patty, are you still out there? Do you still have that TD-700 cleaning flap ?   Cheers, Rainer S. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jan 11 14:29:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Garner, Scott H via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:29:33 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] EXTERNAL: Re: Patty In-Reply-To: References: <20180110163833.fml7xkabo08k0k88@webmail.sasktel.net> Message-ID: Patty!!, How are you? It's Scott from Coatesville, PA, the town where everyone wears a coat. I hope you are doing well. I have I sold off all my Nak stuff less 1 1000zxl. You have to hold on to something from the past right? Wishing you well, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Patty via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 3:46 PM To: joyell.solie at sasktel.net; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [naktalk] Patty YES I DO.... GONNA COST LOTSSSSSSS LMAO PATTY BERETTA PURCHASING/SALES 1815 S ANDERSON AVE COMPTON CA 90220 310-639-2424 -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 2:39 PM To: Naktalk Subject: [naktalk] Patty Patty, are you still out there? Do you still have that TD-700 cleaning flap ?   Cheers, Rainer S. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 14 12:01:10 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Gerhard Wartha via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:01:10 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] ZXL CPU Instrument Message-ID: I will go to Japan in February. I want to buy the N1000 ZXL CPU connectors who are needed to connect the ZXL Maintenance Instrument to the CPU. I am thinking to make two off this M-9057 Instruments. I found the Schematics to make them inside the original ZXL Service Manual. It is made with 27 switches. LED diodes display,and two C-Mos IC´s. I am planning to make one of it to rent it worldwide. What do you think about that? I already have the metal Boxes, the unit will be around 4 kilograms. Very stable, so it will be easy to ship the unit. " It is necessary to put the circuit to the desired adjustment condition." … Nakamichi did write that in the Service Manual. What to you think ? Gerhard / Vienna GERHARD WARTHA KIRCHENGASSE 41 | 1070 WIEN | AUSTRIA Tel : + 43 (0) 650/5266705 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 14 12:05:17 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (N.van.wijnen@ziggo.nl via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:05:17 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] ZXL CPU Instrument In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <02B55D37-E19E-4B36-9FBF-C05E08FFD36B@ziggo.nl> Hi Gerhard, I am intrested in some sets of the connectors. Is it possible to buy 5 sets from these and deliver the to me? I did not find these connectors on regular places here in europe. Best regards Norman Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 14 jan. 2018 om 12:01 heeft Gerhard Wartha via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > I will go to Japan in February. > > I want to buy the N1000 ZXL CPU connectors who are needed to connect the ZXL Maintenance Instrument > to the CPU. > > I am thinking to make two off this M-9057 Instruments. > I found the Schematics to make them inside the original ZXL Service Manual. > > It is made with 27 switches. LED diodes display,and two C-Mos IC´s. > I am planning to make one of it to rent it worldwide. > > What do you think about that? > > I already have the metal Boxes, the unit will be around > 4 kilograms. Very stable, so it will be easy to ship the unit. > " It is necessary to put the circuit to the desired adjustment condition." > … Nakamichi did write that in the Service Manual. > > What to you think ? > > Gerhard / Vienna > > > GERHARD WARTHA > > KIRCHENGASSE 41 | 1070 WIEN | AUSTRIA > > Tel : + 43 (0) 650/5266705 > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 14 13:01:50 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (N.van.wijnen@ziggo.nl via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:01:50 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] ZXL CPU Instrument In-Reply-To: <02B55D37-E19E-4B36-9FBF-C05E08FFD36B@ziggo.nl> References: <02B55D37-E19E-4B36-9FBF-C05E08FFD36B@ziggo.nl> Message-ID: <839BFB72-C451-4A55-92FA-DEE25456D8A3@ziggo.nl> Hi Gerhard, You need that m9057 to calibrate all the internal values of the machine. Without that it is nearly impossible if you ask me. I recently did a overhaul job on a 1000zxl and because of replacement of many parts the machine did get a complete calibration. Well if you can find the connectors that would be great . I am intrested to buy 5 pieces from each connector you can found there. Best regards Norman Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 14 jan. 2018 om 12:05 heeft N.van.wijnen at ziggo.nl via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Gerhard, > I am intrested in some sets of the connectors. > Is it possible to buy 5 sets from these and deliver the to me? I did not find these connectors on regular places here in europe. > Best regards > Norman > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > >> Op 14 jan. 2018 om 12:01 heeft Gerhard Wartha via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: >> >> I will go to Japan in February. >> >> I want to buy the N1000 ZXL CPU connectors who are needed to connect the ZXL Maintenance Instrument >> to the CPU. >> >> I am thinking to make two off this M-9057 Instruments. >> I found the Schematics to make them inside the original ZXL Service Manual. >> >> It is made with 27 switches. LED diodes display,and two C-Mos IC´s. >> I am planning to make one of it to rent it worldwide. >> >> What do you think about that? >> >> I already have the metal Boxes, the unit will be around >> 4 kilograms. Very stable, so it will be easy to ship the unit. >> " It is necessary to put the circuit to the desired adjustment condition." >> … Nakamichi did write that in the Service Manual. >> >> What to you think ? >> >> Gerhard / Vienna >> >> >> GERHARD WARTHA >> >> KIRCHENGASSE 41 | 1070 WIEN | AUSTRIA >> >> Tel : + 43 (0) 650/5266705 >> >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 16 09:55:34 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:55:34 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter Message-ID: <5A5DBE06.70905@gmail.com> Dear Naktalkers, I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? Thanks Bernard From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 16 11:12:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Birger Glosimot via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:12:45 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <5A5DBE06.70905@gmail.com> References: <5A5DBE06.70905@gmail.com> Message-ID: <000001d38eb2$8d9e48c0$a8dada40$@tilkoblet.net> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? Birger -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av bb via Naktalk Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter Dear Naktalkers, I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? Thanks Bernard ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 16 13:48:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:48:26 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <000001d38eb2$8d9e48c0$a8dada40$@tilkoblet.net> References: <5A5DBE06.70905@gmail.com> <000001d38eb2$8d9e48c0$a8dada40$@tilkoblet.net> Message-ID: <5A5DF49A.80902@gmail.com> Hi Birger, No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. Too bad Bernard Birger Glosimot a écrit : > https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 > > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? > > Birger > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av bb via Naktalk > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > Dear Naktalkers, > > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. > > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? > > Thanks > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 16 14:32:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:32:15 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> References: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <5A5DFEDF.1090904@gmail.com> I do agree about the time life of LEDs but I do not understand what can be responsible of this "disconnection" except R319 as I have checked the soldered joints, and if so, why the "right channel" analogue does work ? Bernard Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : > The most likely is that it has built up some oxide or another cause to > disconnection between the driver and the LED. The least likely is that > there is a semiconductor error in the driver or the LED. Those > components usually have an "eternal" life. > > Ingemar from Sweden > > > -------- Originalmeddelande -------- > Från: bb via Naktalk > Datum: 2018-01-16 13:48 (GMT+01:00) > Till: Birger Glosimot > Kopia: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' > Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > Hi Birger, > > No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. > Too bad > > Bernard > > Birger Glosimot a écrit : > > > https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 > > > > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for > the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that > could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? > > > > Birger > > > > > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av bb > via Naktalk > > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 > > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > > > Dear Naktalkers, > > > > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining > anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a > while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. > > > > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither > unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the > first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? > > > > Thanks > > Bernard > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain > your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 16 14:07:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:07:03 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <5A5DF49A.80902@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> The most likely is that it has built up some oxide or another cause to disconnection between the driver and the LED. The least likely is that there is a semiconductor error in the driver or the LED. Those components usually have an "eternal" life. Ingemar from Sweden -------- Originalmeddelande --------Från: bb via Naktalk Datum: 2018-01-16 13:48 (GMT+01:00) Till: Birger Glosimot Kopia: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter Hi Birger, No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. Too bad Bernard Birger Glosimot a écrit : > https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 > > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? > > Birger > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av bb via Naktalk > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > Dear Naktalkers, > > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. > > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? > > Thanks > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > >   ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 17 13:49:17 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:49:17 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Pressure Roller Arm Ass'y washers Message-ID: <5A5F464D.8030909@gmail.com> Dear Naktalkers, Following my first mail dealing with Dragon, I was wondering in the SM, page 20, describing the washers of the pressure rollers assemblies, what does mean "T" in "2mm 0.25T" ? I have also found that when I insert the thinner washers inside the cage as described in the SM, the take-up cage in not fully free to rotate. Conversely, when I insert the thicker washers inside the cage (reverse of what described in the SM), the cage is indeed free to rotate. Is there any mistake in the SM ? or the thinner washers do have to go inside the roller cage ? Would someone be willing to confirm/comment ? Thank for guidance Bernard From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 17 14:43:51 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 07:43:51 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Pressure Roller Arm Ass'y washers Message-ID: <20180117074351.hut46q44g08kg0kg@webmail.sasktel.net> Hello Bernard,   "T" might stand for Teflon ?? There definetly can be mistakes in the service manual.  Are you the same Bernard that sold me the new ZX-9 pinch rollers a few years ago?   Cheers, Rainer On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:49:17 +0100, bb via Naktalk wrote: Dear Naktalkers, Following my first mail dealing with Dragon, I was wondering in the SM, page 20, describing the washers of the pressure rollers assemblies, what does mean "T" in "2mm 0.25T" ? I have also found that when I insert the thinner washers inside the cage as described in the SM, the take-up cage in not fully free to rotate. Conversely, when I insert the thicker washers inside the cage (reverse of what described in the SM), the cage is indeed free to rotate. Is there any mistake in the SM ? or the thinner washers do have to go inside the roller cage ? Would someone be willing to confirm/comment ? Thank for guidance Bernard ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 17 15:00:07 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:00:07 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Pressure Roller Arm Ass'y washers In-Reply-To: <20180117074351.hut46q44g08kg0kg@webmail.sasktel.net> References: <20180117074351.hut46q44g08kg0kg@webmail.sasktel.net> Message-ID: <5A5F56E7.1060402@gmail.com> Hello Rainer, Yes, I am. Are do you evaluate these rollers? However, there are too large for the Dragon...! Another way to ask my question about the thickness of tehse washers would be "Does the roller has to have some transverse (from back to front on its axe) play into the cage ?". If yes, it makes sense that the thinner washers have to go inside. If not, the thicker ones have to go inside the cage... Best Bernard Joy-Ell & Rainer a écrit : > > Hello Bernard, > > > > "T" might stand for Teflon ?? There definetly can be mistakes in the > service manual. > > Are you the same Bernard that sold me the new ZX-9 pinch rollers a > few years ago? > > > > Cheers, > > Rainer > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:49:17 +0100, bb via Naktalk > wrote: > > Dear Naktalkers, > > Following my first mail dealing with Dragon, I was wondering in > the SM, > page 20, describing the washers of the pressure rollers > assemblies, what > does mean "T" in "2mm 0.25T" ? > > I have also found that when I insert the thinner washers inside > the cage > as described in the SM, the take-up cage in not fully free to rotate. > Conversely, when I insert the thicker washers inside the cage > (reverse > of what described in the SM), the cage is indeed free to rotate. > > Is there any mistake in the SM ? or the thinner washers do have to go > inside the roller cage ? Would someone be willing to confirm/comment ? > > Thank for guidance > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 17 15:51:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (N.van.wijnen@ziggo.nl via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:51:59 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Pressure Roller Arm Ass'y washers In-Reply-To: <5A5F464D.8030909@gmail.com> References: <5A5F464D.8030909@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Bernard, Mostly there are three thick and one thinner on the outside where the clip is mounted. 0,023 are thick and 0,011 is thin. One technican told me that these units are asembled in the factory to get the most narrow gap from the roller and a good movement when mounted. Because of that not all the washers are the same thickness. Best regards, Norman Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 17 jan. 2018 om 13:49 heeft bb via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > Dear Naktalkers, > > Following my first mail dealing with Dragon, I was wondering in the SM, page 20, describing the washers of the pressure rollers assemblies, what does mean "T" in "2mm 0.25T" ? > > I have also found that when I insert the thinner washers inside the cage as described in the SM, the take-up cage in not fully free to rotate. Conversely, when I insert the thicker washers inside the cage (reverse of what described in the SM), the cage is indeed free to rotate. > > Is there any mistake in the SM ? or the thinner washers do have to go inside the roller cage ? Would someone be willing to confirm/comment ? > > Thank for guidance > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Jan 20 08:14:02 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 01:14:02 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Pressure Roller Arm Ass'y washers In-Reply-To: <5A5F56E7.1060402@gmail.com> References: <20180117074351.hut46q44g08kg0kg@webmail.sasktel.net> <5A5F56E7.1060402@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20180120011402.tjmm5612isks804s@webmail.sasktel.net> Bernard, I never got a chance to evaluate those rollers because the rubber had deteriorated before I had a chance to install them.  On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:00:07 +0100, bb via Naktalk wrote: Hello Rainer, Yes, I am. Are do you evaluate these rollers? However, there are too large for the Dragon...! Another way to ask my question about the thickness of tehse washers would be "Does the roller has to have some transverse (from back to front on its axe) play into the cage ?". If yes, it makes sense that the thinner washers have to go inside. If not, the thicker ones have to go inside the cage... Best Bernard Joy-Ell & Rainer a écrit : > > Hello Bernard, > > > > "T" might stand for Teflon ?? There definetly can be mistakes in the > service manual. > > Are you the same Bernard that sold me the new ZX-9 pinch rollers a > few years ago? > > > > Cheers, > > Rainer > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:49:17 +0100, bb via Naktalk wrote: > > Dear Naktalkers, > > Following my first mail dealing with Dragon, I was wondering in > the SM, > page 20, describing the washers of the pressure rollers > assemblies, what > does mean "T" in "2mm 0.25T" ? > > I have also found that when I insert the thinner washers inside > the cage > as described in the SM, the take-up cage in not fully free to rotate. > Conversely, when I insert the thicker washers inside the cage > (reverse > of what described in the SM), the cage is indeed free to rotate. > > Is there any mistake in the SM ? or the thinner washers do have to go > inside the roller cage ? Would someone be willing to confirm/comment ? > > Thank for guidance > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jan 21 13:14:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:14:05 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Pressure Roller Arm Ass'y washers In-Reply-To: <20180120011402.tjmm5612isks804s@webmail.sasktel.net> References: <20180117074351.hut46q44g08kg0kg@webmail.sasktel.net> <5A5F56E7.1060402@gmail.com> <20180120011402.tjmm5612isks804s@webmail.sasktel.net> Message-ID: <5A64840D.80705@gmail.com> Rainer, That's strange to me because I have installed lots of them and they are really good. Would you have a picture of how they became ? I still have some, please send me your adress in order for me to send you a new pair All the best Bernard Joy-Ell & Rainer a écrit : > > Bernard, I never got a chance to evaluate those rollers because the > rubber had deteriorated before I had a chance to install them. > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:00:07 +0100, bb via Naktalk > wrote: > > Hello Rainer, > > Yes, I am. Are do you evaluate these rollers? However, there are too > large for the Dragon...! > > Another way to ask my question about the thickness of tehse washers > would be "Does the roller has to have some transverse (from back to > front on its axe) play into the cage ?". If yes, it makes sense > that the > thinner washers have to go inside. If not, the thicker ones have > to go > inside the cage... > > Best > Bernard > > Joy-Ell & Rainer a écrit : > > > > Hello Bernard, > > > > > > > > "T" might stand for Teflon ?? There definetly can be mistakes in > the > > service manual. > > > > Are you the same Bernard that sold me the new ZX-9 pinch rollers a > > few years ago? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Rainer > > > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:49:17 +0100, bb via Naktalk > > wrote: > > > > Dear Naktalkers, > > > > Following my first mail dealing with Dragon, I was wondering in > > the SM, > > page 20, describing the washers of the pressure rollers > > assemblies, what > > does mean "T" in "2mm 0.25T" ? > > > > I have also found that when I insert the thinner washers inside > > the cage > > as described in the SM, the take-up cage in not fully free to > rotate. > > Conversely, when I insert the thicker washers inside the cage > > (reverse > > of what described in the SM), the cage is indeed free to rotate. > > > > Is there any mistake in the SM ? or the thinner washers do have > to go > > inside the roller cage ? Would someone be willing to > confirm/comment ? > > > > Thank for guidance > > Bernard > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > > Maintain your account here: > > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 26 11:48:14 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:48:14 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> References: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <5A6B076E.7060407@gmail.com> Dear all, OK, I checked and the second LED has died! So if someone were to have a spare LED-Meter for Dragon to sell, please let me know (see attached picture). One can always dream... All the best Bernard Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : > The most likely is that it has built up some oxide or another cause to > disconnection between the driver and the LED. The least likely is that > there is a semiconductor error in the driver or the LED. Those > components usually have an "eternal" life. > > Ingemar from Sweden > > > -------- Originalmeddelande -------- > Från: bb via Naktalk > Datum: 2018-01-16 13:48 (GMT+01:00) > Till: Birger Glosimot > Kopia: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' > Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > Hi Birger, > > No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. > Too bad > > Bernard > > Birger Glosimot a écrit : > > > https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 > > > > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for > the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that > could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? > > > > Birger > > > > > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av bb > via Naktalk > > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 > > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > > > Dear Naktalkers, > > > > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining > anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a > while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. > > > > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither > unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the > first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? > > > > Thanks > > Bernard > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain > your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Dragon LED-meter.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 66842 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 26 15:35:56 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Richard L. Hess via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:35:56 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <5A6B076E.7060407@gmail.com> References: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> <5A6B076E.7060407@gmail.com> Message-ID: <00a54f55-54cd-d237-c7ca-902e47e7e952@richardhess.com> Bernard, Some thoughts... Are you certain the LED is dead? Have you examined all the solder joints under magnification? Have you measured the voltage going to the LED? Is that a fully-molded assembly or is it a cover over individual LEDs? While it is possible for an LED to go, there are many less reliable links in the chain. Also, depending on how that was manufactured, it MIGHT be possible to replace an individual LED. I know the full module would be ideal, but... Cheers, Richard On 2018-01-26 5:48 AM, bb via Naktalk wrote: > Dear all, > > OK, I checked and the second LED has died! > So if someone were to have a spare LED-Meter for Dragon to sell, > please let me know (see attached picture). > > One can always dream... > > All the best > Bernard > > Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : >> The most likely is that it has built up some oxide or another cause >> to disconnection between the driver and the LED. The least likely is >> that there is a semiconductor error in the driver or the LED. Those >> components usually have an "eternal" life. >> >> Ingemar from Sweden >> >> >> -------- Originalmeddelande -------- >> Från: bb via Naktalk >> Datum: 2018-01-16 13:48 (GMT+01:00) >> Till: Birger Glosimot >> Kopia: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' >> Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter >> >> Hi Birger, >> >> No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. >> Too bad >> >> Bernard >> >> Birger Glosimot a écrit : >> > >> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 >> > >> > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for >> the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that >> could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? >> > >> > Birger >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Opprinnelig melding----- >> > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av bb >> via Naktalk >> > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 >> > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >> > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter >> > >> > Dear Naktalkers, >> > >> > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining >> anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a >> while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. >> > >> > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither >> unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the >> first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Bernard >> > >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain >> your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> > >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> > >> > >> > >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >>                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: >> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -- Richard L. Hess email: richard at richardhess.com Aurora, Ontario, Canada http://www.richardhess.com/ http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 26 15:55:51 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:55:51 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <00a54f55-54cd-d237-c7ca-902e47e7e952@richardhess.com> References: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> <5A6B076E.7060407@gmail.com> <00a54f55-54cd-d237-c7ca-902e47e7e952@richardhess.com> Message-ID: <5A6B4177.7000404@gmail.com> Richard, Thanks for your suggestions. I will consider them very carefully and let you know (asap) Best Bernard Richard L. Hess via Naktalk a écrit : > > Bernard, > > Some thoughts... > > Are you certain the LED is dead? > > Have you examined all the solder joints under magnification? > > Have you measured the voltage going to the LED? > > Is that a fully-molded assembly or is it a cover over individual LEDs? > > While it is possible for an LED to go, there are many less reliable > links in the chain. Also, depending on how that was manufactured, it > MIGHT be possible to replace an individual LED. > > I know the full module would be ideal, but... > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > > On 2018-01-26 5:48 AM, bb via Naktalk wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> OK, I checked and the second LED has died! >> So if someone were to have a spare LED-Meter for Dragon to sell, >> please let me know (see attached picture). >> >> One can always dream... >> >> All the best >> Bernard >> >> Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : >>> The most likely is that it has built up some oxide or another cause >>> to disconnection between the driver and the LED. The least likely is >>> that there is a semiconductor error in the driver or the LED. Those >>> components usually have an "eternal" life. >>> >>> Ingemar from Sweden >>> >>> >>> -------- Originalmeddelande -------- >>> Från: bb via Naktalk >>> Datum: 2018-01-16 13:48 (GMT+01:00) >>> Till: Birger Glosimot >>> Kopia: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' >>> Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter >>> >>> Hi Birger, >>> >>> No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. >>> Too bad >>> >>> Bernard >>> >>> Birger Glosimot a écrit : >>> > >>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts-For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash=item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 >>> > >>> > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for >>> the Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that >>> could be used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? >>> > >>> > Birger >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Opprinnelig melding----- >>> > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av >>> bb via Naktalk >>> > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 >>> > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >>> > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter >>> > >>> > Dear Naktalkers, >>> > >>> > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining >>> anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for >>> a while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. >>> > >>> > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is >>> neither unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip >>> driving the first 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Bernard >>> > >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> > >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >> >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > -- > Richard L. Hess email: richard at richardhess.com > Aurora, Ontario, Canada http://www.richardhess.com/ > http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm > Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jan 26 19:29:54 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:29:54 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter In-Reply-To: <00a54f55-54cd-d237-c7ca-902e47e7e952@richardhess.com> References: <5a5df8fc.e4212e0a.a304d.37aa@mx.google.com> <5A6B076E.7060407@gmail.com> <00a54f55-54cd-d237-c7ca-902e47e7e952@richardhess.com> Message-ID: The most unlikely things sometimes happen. In this case you could almost say a chance on the million. But I still find it difficult to really believe. And this LED must have been working correctly before something strange happened. Ingemar 2018-01-26 15:35 GMT+01:00 Richard L. Hess via Naktalk < naktalk at lists.naks.com>: > Bernard, > > Some thoughts... > > Are you certain the LED is dead? > > Have you examined all the solder joints under magnification? > > Have you measured the voltage going to the LED? > > Is that a fully-molded assembly or is it a cover over individual LEDs? > > While it is possible for an LED to go, there are many less reliable links > in the chain. Also, depending on how that was manufactured, it MIGHT be > possible to replace an individual LED. > > I know the full module would be ideal, but... > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > On 2018-01-26 5:48 AM, bb via Naktalk wrote: > > Dear all, > > OK, I checked and the second LED has died! > So if someone were to have a spare LED-Meter for Dragon to sell, please > let me know (see attached picture). > > One can always dream... > > All the best > Bernard > > Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : > > The most likely is that it has built up some oxide or another cause to > disconnection between the driver and the LED. The least likely is that > there is a semiconductor error in the driver or the LED. Those components > usually have an "eternal" life. > > Ingemar from Sweden > > > -------- Originalmeddelande -------- > Från: bb via Naktalk > Datum: 2018-01-16 13:48 (GMT+01:00) > Till: Birger Glosimot > Kopia: 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' > > Rubrik: Re: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > Hi Birger, > > No, even that from MR-1 is not the same. > Too bad > > Bernard > > Birger Glosimot a écrit : > > https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-ZX-9-ZX9-ZX7-Parts- > For-Cassette-Tape-Deck-Control-PCB-Assembly/272981768746?hash= > item3f8efb3a2a:g:3G8AAOSwa3BaMZC2 > > > > This is as I can see from my ZX-9 and Dragon, a little to long for the > Dragon? But maybe there are LED indicators from other decks that could be > used? Maybe BX-300/MR-1? > > > > Birger > > > > > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com > ] På vegne av bb via Naktalk > > Sendt: tirsdag 16. januar 2018 09.56 > > Til: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > > Emne: [naktalk] Dragon Indicator LED-meter > > > > Dear Naktalkers, > > > > I have a Dragon with the second (from bottom) left LED not shining > anymore. It has been working for a while then has begun to stop for a > while, then working again and then defenitely stopped. > > > > I fear it is the LED itself and I guess the display unit is neither > unobtainable nor reparable Is it worth swapping the chip driving the first > 10 segments to see if it chnages anything ? > > > > Thanks > > Bernard > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain > your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > -- > Richard L. Hess email: richard at richardhess.com > Aurora, Ontario, Canada http://www.richardhess.com/http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm > Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes. > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jan 29 04:25:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Kyle Quinn via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:25:01 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue Message-ID: I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will hopefully get a response. I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jan 29 13:00:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 06:00:46 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20180129060046.q57r8hlis8w088ko@webmail.sasktel.net> Maybe try to jumper a ground to the back plate.   Cheers, Rainer  On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:25:01 -0500, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk wrote: I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will hopefully get a response. I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jan 29 14:52:35 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Birger Glosimot via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:52:35 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue In-Reply-To: <20180129060046.q57r8hlis8w088ko@webmail.sasktel.net> References: <20180129060046.q57r8hlis8w088ko@webmail.sasktel.net> Message-ID: <000001d39908$6b3ec420$41bc4c60$@tilkoblet.net> My first impression is that this is related to the control gear. Either the gear has come out of position, or the gear motor has a wire that has come loose from either the solder point on the motor, or from the feed? Side. This has happened to me. Birger Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk Sendt: mandag 29. januar 2018 13.01 Til: Kyle Quinn <11justsomekid at gmail.com>; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Emne: Re: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue Maybe try to jumper a ground to the back plate. Cheers, Rainer On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:25:01 -0500, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk > wrote: I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will hopefully get a response. I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 30 07:02:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Martin Short via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:02:13 +1300 Subject: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <760b0865-8df0-7320-2b67-2677ea15b4ee@actrix.co.nz> Hi Kyle, From that description, sounds like your mode control motor is out of sync.. the motor driven mode cam gear set on the back of the mechanism isn't working properly. Could be the motor itself sticking, usually is. You can manually check by 'assisting' the cam gear set with a finger while changing modes. If the deck behaves, then good chance that is it. Fingers crossed, cheers Martin On 29/01/2018 4:25 PM, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk wrote: > I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will hopefully get a response. > > I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jan 29 23:36:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (alan505 via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:36:03 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Question about possible missing resistors on PA-350 Mobile Amp Message-ID: I'm setting up a vintage Nakamichi Mobile Audio system in a project car and have been performing some Q/A on my components before I "commit" them to their locations. I have a Mobile Audio Series PA-350 35w x4 amp that I am using to drive 4 tweeters. The amp appears to have a few issues as the only output is a pulsating pop every 5 seconds or so. I pulled the lid off and started checking the state of the grounds when I noticed that two of the resistors on the D/D converter PCB had solder pad cracks, one actually having popped out of the hole. The resistors are the 47Ohm 2w fail-safe resistors on R413 to R420. A closer inspection indicated that R415 & R417 had cracks, but R416 & R418 were actually missing from the board. I'm scratching my head on this one because it appears that something was there from the factory as the pads contain solder, with one end left open. The PA-350 service manual schematic shows resistors in these locations, so could this be someone's mod or the result of a technical bulletin? I'm curious to see if anyone else has encountered missing resistors at this location. Also, any recommendations of "fail safe" resistors if it turns out that they are needed? Thanks, Alan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jan 30 16:34:41 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (tom dodge via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:34:41 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 19 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The other problem could be corrosion on the 3 leaf switches that the mode control motor actuates. On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: > Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to > naktalk at lists.naks.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." > > > Naktalk digest mailing list > > Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is > to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to > get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, > don't go with digest mode. > > If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the > digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply > message... you really need to know what you are doing. > > Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these > precautions may get discarded. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: BX-125 Mechanism Issue (Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk) > 2. Re: BX-125 Mechanism Issue (Birger Glosimot via Naktalk) > 3. Re: BX-125 Mechanism Issue (Martin Short via Naktalk) > 4. Question about possible missing resistors on PA-350 Mobile > Amp (alan505 via Naktalk) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 06:00:46 -0600 > From: Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk > To: Kyle Quinn <11justsomekid at gmail.com>, "Talk about Nakamichi > Cassette Decks" > Subject: Re: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue > Message-ID: <20180129060046.q57r8hlis8w088ko at webmail.sasktel.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > Maybe try to jumper a ground to the back plate. > > Cheers, > Rainer > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:25:01 -0500, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk wrote: > > I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will > hopefully get a response. > > I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece > behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken > apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted > strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock > into place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't > do anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be > an electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the > mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare > parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the > wires one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not > an expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: attachments/20180129/e54f26b1/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:52:35 +0100 > From: Birger Glosimot via Naktalk > To: , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette > Decks'" > Subject: Re: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue > Message-ID: <000001d39908$6b3ec420$41bc4c60$@tilkoblet.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > My first impression is that this is related to the control gear. Either > the gear has come out of position, or the gear motor has a wire that has > come loose from either the solder point on the motor, or from the feed? > Side. This has happened to me. > > > > Birger > > > > Fra: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] På vegne av Joy-Ell > & Rainer via Naktalk > Sendt: mandag 29. januar 2018 13.01 > Til: Kyle Quinn <11justsomekid at gmail.com>; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette > Decks > Emne: Re: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue > > > > Maybe try to jumper a ground to the back plate. > > > > Cheers, > > Rainer > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:25:01 -0500, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk < > naktalk at lists.naks.com > wrote: > > I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will hopefully > get a response. > > I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece > behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken > apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted > strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into > place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do > anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an > electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the > mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare > parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires > one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an > expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: attachments/20180129/1e0634d7/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:02:13 +1300 > From: Martin Short via Naktalk > To: Kyle Quinn via Naktalk > Subject: Re: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue > Message-ID: <760b0865-8df0-7320-2b67-2677ea15b4ee at actrix.co.nz> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Hi Kyle, > > From that description, sounds like your mode control motor is out of > sync.. the motor driven mode cam gear set on the back of the mechanism > isn't working properly. Could be the motor itself sticking, usually is. > You can manually check by 'assisting' the cam gear set with a finger > while changing modes. If the deck behaves, then good chance that is it. > > Fingers crossed, cheers > > Martin > > > On 29/01/2018 4:25 PM, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk wrote: > > I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will > hopefully get a response. > > > > I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece > behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken > apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted > strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into > place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do > anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an > electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the > mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare > parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires > one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an > expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:36:03 -0600 > From: alan505 via Naktalk > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: [naktalk] Question about possible missing resistors on PA-350 > Mobile Amp > Message-ID: > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I'm setting up a vintage Nakamichi Mobile Audio system in a project car and > have been performing some Q/A on my components before I "commit" them to > their locations. > > I have a Mobile Audio Series PA-350 35w x4 amp that I am using to drive 4 > tweeters. The amp appears to have a few issues as the only output is a > pulsating pop every 5 seconds or so. I pulled the lid off and started > checking the state of the grounds when I noticed that two of the resistors > on the D/D converter PCB had solder pad cracks, one actually having popped > out of the hole. > > The resistors are the 47Ohm 2w fail-safe resistors on R413 to R420. A > closer inspection indicated that R415 & R417 had cracks, but R416 & R418 > were actually missing from the board. > > I'm scratching my head on this one because it appears that something was > there from the factory as the pads contain solder, with one end left open. > The PA-350 service manual schematic shows resistors in these locations, so > could this be someone's mod or the result of a technical bulletin? > > I'm curious to see if anyone else has encountered missing resistors at this > location. Also, any recommendations of "fail safe" resistors if it turns > out that they are needed? > > Thanks, > Alan > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: attachments/20180129/b07da8ae/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 19 > **************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jan 31 02:14:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Kyle Quinn via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:14:13 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX-125 Mechanism Issue Message-ID: <0si0car2xtu71n8bfpwwllvf.1517361113028@email.android.com> Thanks for the tip Martin! I looked at the entire mode switching mechanism and found that one of the copper pins looks different than the other two. It looks like it was lifted higher than the others and there is a small hole where on the other ones, there is another piece of copper. I don't know what it is, but I think it's the problem. If I hold it down and press play, it starts to play for a few seconds, then stops. On January 30, 2018, at 1:02 AM, Martin Short via Naktalk wrote: Hi Kyle, From that description, sounds like your mode control motor is out of sync.. the motor driven mode cam gear set on the back of the mechanism isn't working properly. Could be the motor itself sticking, usually is. You can manually check by 'assisting' the cam gear set with a finger while changing modes. If the deck behaves, then good chance that is it. Fingers crossed, cheers Martin On 29/01/2018 4:25 PM, Kyle Quinn via Naktalk wrote: > I asked this a few months ago, so I'll send it against and will hopefully get a response. > > I recently fixed the idler tire on my Nakamichi BX-125 (a plastic piece behind the tire itself), but in doing so, the mechanism had to be taken apart. I put it all back together, but when I tested it, it acted strangely. The transport mechanism for going up and down doesn't lock into place and just shuffles back and forth. Also, FF and rewind don't do anything. I checked all the wires that I unplugged, so it can't be an electrical thing, right? The transport worked fine before I took the mechanism out; did I misalign something? I didn't end up with any spare parts, so I didn't forget anything. Some guy suggested I switch the wires one one of the motors. That doesn't make any sense to me (I'm not an expert, of course), so I haven't tried it. What do I do? Any idea? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-10.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 2 16:21:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Chris J Brady via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) References: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> Hello - I am starting a rather large project of transcribing cassettes of rare ('lost') off-air recordings of Beeb programmes. I need the very best quality digitisations. I have just purchased a second-hand but in good condition DR 10 machine, with pressure pad lift-away. I now need to learn the finer arts of azimuth adjustment and calibration ec. However it didn't come with any User Manuals. I have searched the web and there are no English versions around. Please can someone tell me how or where to obtain one. Thank you - Chris B. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 2 21:45:52 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:45:52 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) In-Reply-To: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <000001d45a88$8844f660$98cee320$@twc.com> Hi, Chris This is a long shot, and one you may have already tried: http://stereomanuals.com/ The fellow I have dealt with successfully and will recommend unhesitatingly is at rick.stereomanuals at gmail.com so you might send him an email with a description of your needs. I wish you good luck! Any thing more I might be of help with, please email me at penman at twc.com Les Morgan Lanesville, IN USA -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Chris J Brady via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:21 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) Hello - I am starting a rather large project of transcribing cassettes of rare ('lost') off-air recordings of Beeb programmes. I need the very best quality digitisations. I have just purchased a second-hand but in good condition DR 10 machine, with pressure pad lift-away. I now need to learn the finer arts of azimuth adjustment and calibration ec. However it didn't come with any User Manuals. I have searched the web and there are no English versions around. Please can someone tell me how or where to obtain one. Thank you - Chris B. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 2 22:03:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ken Mashlan via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 20:03:26 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) In-Reply-To: <000001d45a88$8844f660$98cee320$@twc.com> References: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> <000001d45a88$8844f660$98cee320$@twc.com> Message-ID: Also a lot of manuals in the Naktalk Wiki. Link is in the signature, but here as well... :) http://wiki.naks.com -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Les Morgan via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2018 8:46 AM To: 'Chris J Brady' ; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) Hi, Chris This is a long shot, and one you may have already tried: http://stereomanuals.com/ The fellow I have dealt with successfully and will recommend unhesitatingly is at rick.stereomanuals at gmail.com so you might send him an email with a description of your needs. I wish you good luck! Any thing more I might be of help with, please email me at penman at twc.com Les Morgan Lanesville, IN USA -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Chris J Brady via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:21 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) Hello - I am starting a rather large project of transcribing cassettes of rare ('lost') off-air recordings of Beeb programmes. I need the very best quality digitisations. I have just purchased a second-hand but in good condition DR 10 machine, with pressure pad lift-away. I now need to learn the finer arts of azimuth adjustment and calibration ec. However it didn't come with any User Manuals. I have searched the web and there are no English versions around. Please can someone tell me how or where to obtain one. Thank you - Chris B. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 2 22:40:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calijente@gmx.net via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:40:22 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) In-Reply-To: References: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> <000001d45a88$8844f660$98cee320$@twc.com> Message-ID: <0D5DCAD3-29CB-4EC8-A2E8-42BCD3108F5B@gmx.net> Hi Chris, Nakamichi DR-10 is virtually the same as Nakamichi DR-2 and both are internally identical to Nakamichi CD-1.5. You can use any of these manuals, available at hifiengine.com (free account required): https://www.hifiengine.com/manual_library/nakamichi/dr-2.shtml Axe Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 2, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Ken Mashlan via Naktalk wrote: > > Also a lot of manuals in the Naktalk Wiki. Link is in the signature, but here as well... :) http://wiki.naks.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Les Morgan via Naktalk > Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2018 8:46 AM > To: 'Chris J Brady' ; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) > > Hi, Chris > > This is a long shot, and one you may have already tried: http://stereomanuals.com/ > > The fellow I have dealt with successfully and will recommend unhesitatingly is at rick.stereomanuals at gmail.com so you might send him an email with a description of your needs. > > I wish you good luck! Any thing more I might be of help with, please email me at penman at twc.com > > Les Morgan > Lanesville, IN USA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:21 AM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) > > Hello - > > I am starting a rather large project of transcribing cassettes of rare ('lost') off-air recordings of Beeb programmes. > > I need the very best quality digitisations. > > I have just purchased a second-hand but in good condition DR 10 machine, with pressure pad lift-away. > > I now need to learn the finer arts of azimuth adjustment and calibration ec. > > However it didn't come with any User Manuals. I have searched the web and there are no English versions around. > > Please can someone tell me how or where to obtain one. > > Thank you - > > Chris B. > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Oct 3 00:00:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rick at StereoManuals.com via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 18:00:45 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) In-Reply-To: <000001d45a88$8844f660$98cee320$@twc.com> Message-ID: Les, Thanks for the kind words. As shown in the NAK manuals catalog on my site, I do not have the DR-10 service manual. Also checked my pdf library... no go. PS.. It's been 9 years now. Time to buy some more manuals :) Best regards, Rick http://www.stereomanuals.com Our mistaken self-identity may cause us to not believe it or act like it, but Jesus is still... The Lord! Explanation? See Stuff Others Wrote /Mistaken Identity http://www.stereomanuals.com/seekers/index.htm -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Les Morgan via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 3:46 PM To: 'Chris J Brady'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) Hi, Chris This is a long shot, and one you may have already tried: http://stereomanuals.com/ The fellow I have dealt with successfully and will recommend unhesitatingly is at rick.stereomanuals at gmail.com so you might send him an email with a description of your needs. I wish you good luck! Any thing more I might be of help with, please email me at penman at twc.com Les Morgan Lanesville, IN USA From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Oct 3 00:20:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bala Ganesh Chandra via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:20:03 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) In-Reply-To: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Chris, I would also advice you to download the manuals and literature for older decks like the 1000 and Dragon as they have good notes in there that will give you some insight on these topics. The internet in general has discussions around these topics as well. The DR10 is a fine machine and I have made and heard many great sounding tapes on it. Kind Regards, Bala Ganesh > On 3 Oct 2018, at 12:21 am, Chris J Brady via Naktalk wrote: > > Hello - > > I am starting a rather large project of transcribing cassettes of rare ('lost') off-air recordings of Beeb programmes. > > I need the very best quality digitisations. > > I have just purchased a second-hand but in good condition DR 10 machine, with pressure pad lift-away. > > I now need to learn the finer arts of azimuth adjustment and calibration ec. > > However it didn't come with any User Manuals. I have searched the web and there are no English versions around. > > Please can someone tell me how or where to obtain one. > > Thank you - > > Chris B. > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Oct 3 13:10:30 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Hilton via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 12:10:30 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) In-Reply-To: References: <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1936839574.2825533.1538490060570@mail.yahoo.com> <000001d45a88$8844f660$98cee320$@twc.com> Message-ID: Please send me your email adress and I will send you a copy of the user manual dovhilton at gmail.com On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 21:10, Ken Mashlan via Naktalk wrote: > Also a lot of manuals in the Naktalk Wiki. Link is in the signature, but > here as well... :) http://wiki.naks.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Les Morgan > via Naktalk > Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2018 8:46 AM > To: 'Chris J Brady' ; 'Talk about Nakamichi > Cassette Decks' > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) > > Hi, Chris > > This is a long shot, and one you may have already tried: > http://stereomanuals.com/ > > The fellow I have dealt with successfully and will recommend > unhesitatingly is at rick.stereomanuals at gmail.com so you might send him > an email with a description of your needs. > > I wish you good luck! Any thing more I might be of help with, please > email me at penman at twc.com > > Les Morgan > Lanesville, IN USA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Chris > J Brady via Naktalk > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:21 AM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Welcome to the "Naktalk" mailing list (Digest mode) > > Hello - > > I am starting a rather large project of transcribing cassettes of rare > ('lost') off-air recordings of Beeb programmes. > > I need the very best quality digitisations. > > I have just purchased a second-hand but in good condition DR 10 machine, > with pressure pad lift-away. > > I now need to learn the finer arts of azimuth adjustment and calibration > ec. > > However it didn't come with any User Manuals. I have searched the web and > there are no English versions around. > > Please can someone tell me how or where to obtain one. > > Thank you - > > Chris B. > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your > account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your > account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -- David Hilton 9 Woodland Way Mill Hill London NW7 2JP Tel (44) 208 959 5363 H Mbl 07961469284 Skype dovhilton -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Oct 5 16:25:54 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Chris J Brady via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] eBay Seller Scam References: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> I purchased a second hand DR 10 on eBay. The machine arrived OK. But sans English User Manual. But thanks to folks here I think I might have tracked one down. However meanwhile I thought better than nothing so I purchased a French version on eBay. It was clearly described as "Nakamichi DR8 & DR10. Cassette Deck User's Manual. French Edition. Unused." The image showed a three hole punch set of pages. It cost £5 plus £3 postage. It arrived today. It was an old leaflet for the DR 1 / 2 / 3. And the seller does not accept exchanges. What a scam, What a crock. Am not happy. The seller also has a German version for sale - let buyers' beware. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nakamichi-DR8-DR10-Cassette-Deck-Users-Manual-German-Edition-Unused/263940264772 But what really pi$$es me off is not so much the loss of the cash (less than £10) but the time wasted in attempting to get a refund out of the seller &/or eBay. CJB From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Oct 5 21:31:39 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rodrigo dos Santos Rocha via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:31:39 -0300 Subject: [naktalk] eBay Seller Scam In-Reply-To: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2BCD7BC3-146C-4705-9867-857EAD3D9C96@terra.com.br> But this is a scam. eBay normally reacts on the buyers behalf much strongly that it does otherwise. Have you attempted to complain to sBay? You should, definitely!!! > On Oct 5, 2018, at 11:25, Chris J Brady via Naktalk wrote: > > I purchased a second hand DR 10 on eBay. The machine arrived OK. But sans English User Manual. > > But thanks to folks here I think I might have tracked one down. > > However meanwhile I thought better than nothing so I purchased a French version on eBay. It was clearly described as "Nakamichi DR8 & DR10. Cassette Deck User's Manual. French Edition. Unused." The image showed a three hole punch set of pages. > > It cost £5 plus £3 postage. > > It arrived today. It was an old leaflet for the DR 1 / 2 / 3. And the seller does not accept exchanges. > > What a scam, What a crock. Am not happy. > > The seller also has a German version for sale - let buyers' beware. > > https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nakamichi-DR8-DR10-Cassette-Deck-Users-Manual-German-Edition-Unused/263940264772 > > But what really pi$$es me off is not so much the loss of the cash (less than £10) but the time wasted in attempting to get a refund out of the seller &/or eBay. > > CJB > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Oct 5 21:34:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (MD via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:34:22 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] eBay Seller Scam In-Reply-To: <2BCD7BC3-146C-4705-9867-857EAD3D9C96@terra.com.br> References: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> <2BCD7BC3-146C-4705-9867-857EAD3D9C96@terra.com.br> Message-ID: Lol> On 10/5/18, Rodrigo dos Santos Rocha via Naktalk wrote: > But this is a scam. eBay normally reacts on the buyers behalf much strongly > that it does otherwise. Have you attempted to complain to sBay? You should, > definitely!!! > > > >> On Oct 5, 2018, at 11:25, Chris J Brady via Naktalk >> wrote: >> >> I purchased a second hand DR 10 on eBay. The machine arrived OK. But sans >> English User Manual. >> >> But thanks to folks here I think I might have tracked one down. >> >> However meanwhile I thought better than nothing so I purchased a French >> version on eBay. It was clearly described as "Nakamichi DR8 & DR10. >> Cassette Deck User's Manual. French Edition. Unused." The image showed a >> three hole punch set of pages. >> >> It cost £5 plus £3 postage. >> >> It arrived today. It was an old leaflet for the DR 1 / 2 / 3. And the >> seller does not accept exchanges. >> >> What a scam, What a crock. Am not happy. >> >> The seller also has a German version for sale - let buyers' beware. >> >> https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nakamichi-DR8-DR10-Cassette-Deck-Users-Manual-German-Edition-Unused/263940264772 >> >> But what really pi$$es me off is not so much the loss of the cash (less >> than £10) but the time wasted in attempting to get a refund out of the >> seller &/or eBay. >> >> CJB >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Oct 5 21:40:20 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Wouter Heijke via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 21:40:20 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] eBay Seller Scam In-Reply-To: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi, Indeed that is something different, ignorant sellers. But maybe I missed something but have you tried the DR1/2/3 owners manual? http://download.naks.com/manuals/owners/english/Nak_DR1_2_3_OwnersManual.pdf It may cover what you need and it is free ;-) Wouter On 2018-10-05 16:25, Chris J Brady via Naktalk wrote: > I purchased a second hand DR 10 on eBay. The machine arrived OK. But > sans English User Manual. > > But thanks to folks here I think I might have tracked one down. > > However meanwhile I thought better than nothing so I purchased a > French version on eBay. It was clearly described as "Nakamichi DR8 & > DR10. Cassette Deck User's Manual. French Edition. Unused." The image > showed a three hole punch set of pages. > > It cost £5 plus £3 postage. > > It arrived today. It was an old leaflet for the DR 1 / 2 / 3. And the > seller does not accept exchanges. > > What a scam, What a crock. Am not happy. > > The seller also has a German version for sale - let buyers' beware. > > https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nakamichi-DR8-DR10-Cassette-Deck-Users-Manual-German-Edition-Unused/263940264772 > > But what really pi$$es me off is not so much the loss of the cash > (less than £10) but the time wasted in attempting to get a refund out > of the seller &/or eBay. > > CJB From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Oct 7 17:58:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Mikkel Benedikt Breiler Mikkelsen via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 17:58:05 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] eBay Seller Scam References: <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2114525670.4866567.1538749554392@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <87.00.01900.D0D2ABB5@n9> Yes Wouter, you missed something. :) -Mikkel ----- Original meddelelse ----- > Fra: Wouter Heijke via Naktalk > Til: Chris J Brady > Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Dato: Fre, 05. okt 2018 21:40 > Emne: Re: [naktalk] eBay Seller Scam > > Hi, > Indeed that is something different, ignorant sellers. > But maybe I missed something but have you tried the DR1/2/3 owners > manual? > > http://download.naks.com/manuals/owners/english/Nak_DR1_2_3_OwnersMa > nual.pdf > > It may cover what you need and it is free ;-) > > Wouter > > > On 2018-10-05 16:25, Chris J Brady via Naktalk wrote: > > I purchased a second hand DR 10 on eBay. The machine arrived OK. > But > > sans English User Manual. > > > > But thanks to folks here I think I might have tracked one down. > > > > However meanwhile I thought better than nothing so I purchased a > > French version on eBay. It was clearly described as "Nakamichi > DR8 & > > DR10. Cassette Deck User's Manual. French Edition. Unused." The > image > > showed a three hole punch set of pages. > > > > It cost £5 plus £3 postage. > > > > It arrived today. It was an old leaflet for the DR 1 / 2 / 3. And > the > > seller does not accept exchanges. > > > > What a scam, What a crock. Am not happy. > > > > The seller also has a German version for sale - let buyers' > beware. > > > > > https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nakamichi-DR8-DR10-Cassette-Deck-Users-Ma > nual-German-Edition-Unused/263940264772 > > > > But what really pi$$es me off is not so much the loss of the cash > > (less than £10) but the time wasted in attempting to get a refund > out > > of the seller &/or eBay. > > > > CJB > > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Oct 7 23:57:02 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Chris J Brady via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of the machine I bought. This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf Chris B. P.S. Please don't try to sell this. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 10:23:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Mikkel Benedikt Breiler Mikkelsen via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:23:18 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1C.5F.01900.6F31BBB5@n9> Hi Chris Thank you. I don't have any Nakamichi, actually. But I hope to be so lucky one day. -Mikkel ----- Original meddelelse ----- > Fra: Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Til: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Dato: Søn, 07. okt 2018 23:57 > Emne: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual > > Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. > > I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of > the machine I bought. > > This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf > > Chris B. > > P.S. Please don't try to sell this. > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 16:45:53 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:45:53 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <1C.5F.01900.6F31BBB5@n9> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> <1C.5F.01900.6F31BBB5@n9> Message-ID: <004901d45f15$9ec72430$dc556c90$@twc.com> Never give up, Mikkel! I bought my Nakamichi BX-100 cassette deck at a thrift store for $15. All it took was a set of belts and cleaning and lubrication, which I did with a bit of help from YouTube. Now I've been torturing it for the last two years. Runs like a champ. Les -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Mikkel Benedikt Breiler Mikkelsen via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 4:23 AM To: Chris J Brady; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual Hi Chris Thank you. I don't have any Nakamichi, actually. But I hope to be so lucky one day. -Mikkel ----- Original meddelelse ----- > Fra: Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Til: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Dato: Søn, 07. okt 2018 23:57 > Emne: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual > > Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. > > I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of > the machine I bought. > > This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf > > Chris B. > > P.S. Please don't try to sell this. > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------=== > ====== ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 16:46:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:46:59 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> Thanks! You're a true gentleman, and a scholar...there are so FEW of us left! *grin* Les -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Chris J Brady via Naktalk Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 5:57 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of the machine I bought. This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf Chris B. P.S. Please don't try to sell this. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 21:20:56 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Wouter Heijke via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:20:56 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> Message-ID: <7d2055fbe43c2c87bfeae7a09ebd7399@xs4all.nl> Once again we get confirmed what we already knew: dr-10 equals dr-2 dr-8 equals dr-3 On 2018-10-08 16:46, Les Morgan via Naktalk wrote: > Thanks! You're a true gentleman, and a scholar...there are so FEW of > us left! *grin* > > Les > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of > Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 5:57 PM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual > > Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. > > I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of > the machine I bought. > > This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf > > Chris B. > > P.S. Please don't try to sell this. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 22:05:58 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:05:58 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <7d2055fbe43c2c87bfeae7a09ebd7399@xs4all.nl> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> <7d2055fbe43c2c87bfeae7a09ebd7399@xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <013101d45f42$544e39c0$fceaad40$@jbrudy.com> JUST FYI, ONE SET WAS SOLD AT THE BEST BUY STORES/FRY'S AND THE OTHER AT HIGH END STORES. JUST THE FACES WERE A BIT DIFFERENT. -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Wouter Heijke via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 12:21 PM To: Les Morgan ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Cc: 'Chris J Brady' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual Once again we get confirmed what we already knew: dr-10 equals dr-2 dr-8 equals dr-3 On 2018-10-08 16:46, Les Morgan via Naktalk wrote: > Thanks! You're a true gentleman, and a scholar...there are so FEW of > us left! *grin* > > Les > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of > Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 5:57 PM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual > > Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. > > I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of > the machine I bought. > > This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf > > Chris B. > > P.S. Please don't try to sell this. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 22:09:14 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:09:14 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <013101d45f42$544e39c0$fceaad40$@jbrudy.com> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> <7d2055fbe43c2c87bfeae7a09ebd7399@xs4all.nl> <013101d45f42$544e39c0$fceaad40$@jbrudy.com> Message-ID: <013a01d45f42$c8fa15a0$5aee40e0$@jbrudy.com> THIS IS PATTY WHOM WORK AT NAKAMICHI FOR AROUND 16YEARS -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 1:06 PM To: 'Wouter Heijke' ; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' ; 'Les Morgan' Cc: 'Chris J Brady' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual JUST FYI, ONE SET WAS SOLD AT THE BEST BUY STORES/FRY'S AND THE OTHER AT HIGH END STORES. JUST THE FACES WERE A BIT DIFFERENT. -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Wouter Heijke via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 12:21 PM To: Les Morgan ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Cc: 'Chris J Brady' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual Once again we get confirmed what we already knew: dr-10 equals dr-2 dr-8 equals dr-3 On 2018-10-08 16:46, Les Morgan via Naktalk wrote: > Thanks! You're a true gentleman, and a scholar...there are so FEW of > us left! *grin* > > Les > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of > Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 5:57 PM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual > > Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. > > I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of > the machine I bought. > > This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf > > Chris B. > > P.S. Please don't try to sell this. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 22:46:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rodrigo via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 17:46:04 -0300 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> Message-ID: I bought a Nakamichi 700 II as in good conditions and working. When I got It it wouldn’t play one channel. Upset with the seller I resigned myself to going after my tech and have him tell me what had to be done. To make a long story short, it took me seven months, buying an old “corpse” of a Nakamichi 700, get it shipped to Brazil and finally have the good one fixed. It is doable. You just have to commit to it! Now it is my joy and pride with my other decks The ZX-7, the Zx660 and one still waiting for parts an RX202. Rodrigo Krause dos Santos Rocha Sent from my iphone From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Oct 8 23:05:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Garner, Scott H via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:05:04 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] EXTERNAL: Re: Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual In-Reply-To: <013a01d45f42$c8fa15a0$5aee40e0$@jbrudy.com> References: <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1385022279.5859197.1538949422747@mail.yahoo.com> <004b01d45f15$c5c60d30$51522790$@twc.com> <7d2055fbe43c2c87bfeae7a09ebd7399@xs4all.nl> <013101d45f42$544e39c0$fceaad40$@jbrudy.com> <013a01d45f42$c8fa15a0$5aee40e0$@jbrudy.com> Message-ID: PATTY!! Its Scott from Coatesville PA. How are things? Still working? I'm inching ever closer to retirement, can't wait. -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 2:09 PM To: patty at jbrudy.com; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' ; 'Wouter Heijke' ; 'Les Morgan' Cc: 'Chris J Brady' Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual THIS IS PATTY WHOM WORK AT NAKAMICHI FOR AROUND 16YEARS -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 1:06 PM To: 'Wouter Heijke' ; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' ; 'Les Morgan' Cc: 'Chris J Brady' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual JUST FYI, ONE SET WAS SOLD AT THE BEST BUY STORES/FRY'S AND THE OTHER AT HIGH END STORES. JUST THE FACES WERE A BIT DIFFERENT. -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Wouter Heijke via Naktalk Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 12:21 PM To: Les Morgan ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Cc: 'Chris J Brady' Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual Once again we get confirmed what we already knew: dr-10 equals dr-2 dr-8 equals dr-3 On 2018-10-08 16:46, Les Morgan via Naktalk wrote: > Thanks! You're a true gentleman, and a scholar...there are so FEW of > us left! *grin* > > Les > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of > Chris J Brady via Naktalk > Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 5:57 PM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk DR10 / DR8 User Manual > > Thank you to all the folks who responded to my enquiry. > > I have now obtained the DR10 User Manual from the original seller of > the machine I bought. > > This has now been scanned and is available for free from this link. > > http://www.mediafire.com/file/f21mqjzmt3yxbig/Nakamichi_DR10_DR8.pdf > > Chris B. > > P.S. Please don't try to sell this. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 9 20:47:06 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Chris J Brady via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes. References: <538736029.7119361.1539110826451.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <538736029.7119361.1539110826451@mail.yahoo.com> Problems Digitising Cassettes. I guess this is a project known by thousands maybe millions. However I am running up against problems. Remounting a spool of tap into another shell is easy enough. So too is reattaching lead in / out tape - 3M sticky tape is ideal, using a sharp pair of scissors to trim any overlap. But the real problem is the actual playing of the cassette tapes. I use iMic and Behringer devices for the actual digitisation, capturing with Audacity. I then do a Save As... in WAV, FLAC and MP3 (320 kbps) formats. I have a variety of double cassette decks - all relatively brand new. They have auto-reverse and switch from the first cassette tape to the second automatically. I always clean the heads manually first, then run a head cleaning cassette, before mounting the cassettes. The cassettes are then rewound forwards and backwards to even up the tape layers. I have to assume that the read head azimuth settings are OK. I have no way to adjust them. So far so good. BUT the digisations are far from perfect. The first side of cassette one is nice and clear but the sound gets a little 'muddy' (loss of clarity and treble) towards the end of that side. The cassette then reverses direction and the 'muddiness' becomes more pronounced. This effect is repeated when its the turn of the second cassette. Sometimes when I'm busy after the second cassette has run its course, the first cassette starts up again. This time the recording has lost all treble, and the digitised recording s all but unlistenable. This is driving me mad, and has wasted so much time. But it indicates a serious sticky-shed issue, likely exacerbated by the cassette pressure pad forcing contact onto the read head. Now I have bought a second hand Nakamichi DR 10. This has one difference to the above decks. It has a cassette pressure pad lift-up device, so that the tape passes across the read head passes across with very little pressure. Hopefully this will keep the sticky-shed to a minimum. What I do find strange is that others maybe with even simpler tape players manage to digitise their cassettes with no reported quality issues. CJB From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 9 21:40:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (alan505 via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:40:00 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Pricey 1000ZXL Limited Message-ID: I'm guessing that the missing plate must be at the engraver who is awaiting the name of the "lucky" purchaser. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nakamichi-1000ZXL-Limited-Cassette-Deck-Vintage-1000-ZXL/223181041478 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Oct 9 21:52:47 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:52:47 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes. Message-ID: <20181009125247.f621f20d161dc191032df80851749ece.d1084acb05.wbe@email04.godaddy.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sigimg0 Type: image/jpeg Size: 10273 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Oct 10 19:41:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Kevin Fetner via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes References: <503623267.314281.1539193264812.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <503623267.314281.1539193264812@mail.yahoo.com> CJB ,Unless I'm missing something here.....back in the day there were really no quality double cassette decks out there that I know of.....cassette bootleggers used slave decks that ran off of source decks. If you used a well maintained/well sorted Nak BX-300 just for this purpose, for example, I think you'd do well. No sense buying a more high-end Nak just to digitize a bunch of tapes....unless you have a buyer to sell to afterward. Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Oct 10 20:55:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:55:16 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes In-Reply-To: <503623267.314281.1539193264812@mail.yahoo.com> References: <503623267.314281.1539193264812.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <503623267.314281.1539193264812@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <009f01d460ca$ca6bf500$5f43df00$@twc.com> Ahhhh, methinks I see reason attempting to override passion! But I must agree, and risk being ignored. One cannot alter physics, no matter how many small animals we sacrifice or how loudly we chant. Les From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Fetner via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:41 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes CJB , Unless I'm missing something here.....back in the day there were really no quality double cassette decks out there that I know of.....cassette bootleggers used slave decks that ran off of source decks. If you used a well maintained/well sorted Nak BX-300 just for this purpose, for example, I think you'd do well. No sense buying a more high-end Nak just to digitize a bunch of tapes....unless you have a buyer to sell to afterward. Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Oct 11 13:11:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Chris J Brady via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes. References: <191943026.8174447.1539256282287.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <191943026.8174447.1539256282287@mail.yahoo.com> Message: 1 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Fetner via Naktalk To: Subject: Re: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes Message-ID: <503623267.314281.1539193264812 at mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" CJB ,Unless I'm missing something here.....back in the day there were really no quality double cassette decks out there that I know of.....cassette bootleggers used slave decks that ran off of source decks. If you used a well maintained/well sorted Nak BX-300 just for this purpose, for example, I think you'd do well. No sense buying a more high-end Nak just to digitize a bunch of tapes....unless you have a buyer to sell to afterward. Kevin ==== Nothing for sale. The project is the common one of digitising ancient cassettes - in our case off-air recordings of radio programmes that have been wiped or junked by the Beeb long ago. All self-financed. We have discovered many recordings that we have the Beeb no longer has in its archives (nor the BLSA) and these were offered back to them - they declined or ignored us - their loss. We need the best possible playback from the cassettes many of which are over 60 years old. We aren't remotely interested in recording anything to tape. Playback is for digitisation ony. It is the poor playback sticky-shed issue that's the problem - likely exacerbated by each cassette's pressure pads on the cassette machine's read heads. We have tried using dual auto-reverse playback devices - this being to simply process two cassettes at a time. However the deteriorating quality of the playback on the dual machines that we have tried using has been an issue. Our interest in Nak machines is that they have a pressure pad lift device. Unfortunately the machine we have is a DR 10 - which plays single cassettes at a time. We'd love a Dragon but cannot justify the expense especially since this is a self-financing hobby and the Beeb isn't interested in what we are doing. CJB. ==== From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Oct 11 13:24:52 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Wouter Heijke via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:24:52 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes. In-Reply-To: <191943026.8174447.1539256282287@mail.yahoo.com> References: <191943026.8174447.1539256282287.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <191943026.8174447.1539256282287@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <455a0d45c5785ef7d9cf3c5a6c7df9a0@xs4all.nl> So you are baking these tapes because of the sticky-shed? Wouter > > CJB ,Unless I'm missing something here.....back in the day there were > really no quality double cassette decks out there that I know > of.....cassette bootleggers used slave decks that ran off of source > decks. If you used a well maintained/well sorted Nak BX-300 just for > this purpose, for example, I think you'd do well. No sense buying a > more high-end Nak just to digitize a bunch of tapes....unless you have > a buyer to sell to afterward. > > Kevin > > ==== > > Nothing for sale. The project is the common one of digitising ancient > cassettes - in our case off-air recordings of radio programmes that > have been wiped or junked by the Beeb long ago. All self-financed. > > We have discovered many recordings that we have the Beeb no longer has > in its archives (nor the BLSA) and these were offered back to them - > they declined or ignored us - their loss. > > We need the best possible playback from the cassettes many of which > are over 60 years old. We aren't remotely interested in recording > anything to tape. Playback is for digitisation ony. > > It is the poor playback sticky-shed issue that's the problem - likely > exacerbated by each cassette's pressure pads on the cassette machine's > read heads. > > We have tried using dual auto-reverse playback devices - this being to > simply process two cassettes at a time. However the deteriorating > quality of the playback on the dual machines that we have tried using > has been an issue. > > Our interest in Nak machines is that they have a pressure pad lift > device. > > Unfortunately the machine we have is a DR 10 - which plays single > cassettes at a time. We'd love a Dragon but cannot justify the expense > especially since this is a self-financing hobby and the Beeb isn't > interested in what we are doing. > > CJB. > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Oct 12 18:20:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Kevin Fetner via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 16:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Problems Digitising Cassettes References: <1670005897.218176.1539361205668.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1670005897.218176.1539361205668@mail.yahoo.com> I've never heard of anyone baking cassette tapes...not saying it can't be done like their reel to reel bretherin....but I wonder how the shell would hold up with the continued heat put to it? Also, I wasn't talking about selling the tapes, I meant buying a top machine like the Dragon you mention, only to sell it after you're finished......to get your money back from your purchase. You should be able to sell a well sorted out Dragon on eBay for what you paid for it.....especially if you make the buyers aware of what you did with it. Again, you're going down a rabbit hole with the dual cassette machines and quality for this project. Reel to reelers have also used NuFinish with remarkable success on the tapes with SSS. Be harder to do with a cassette, but possible and would not require any heat. Tons have been written about NuFinish and SSS tapes....Google it. If you can stabilize the tape, then you can use a lesser machine like the BX-300. You can't make a better product than what you have, i.e., if the recordings are ordinary, they will remain so. But you should be able to preserve what you have in quality once you stabilize the tape. If you don't have the time to copy one cassette to another, then you'd have to set up a slave operation as the bootleggers did with multiple machines. Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Oct 31 17:26:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Wouter Heijke via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:26:59 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] shelved ZX7 with issues Message-ID: <848032efd6a6c5f5afc2bb66a8901380@xs4all.nl> After some quiet tapeless period i decided to take my ZX-7 from the shelf and turn it on.. First problem, cam belt, egg shape does not work, so replaced it. Second it plays slow, very sloooow, but plays. I suspect the 1999 original Nak belt will be streteched too much so needs replacing. Anyone has good experience with sellers other then Marrs? There are several affordable options, which one do you (eropean) guys prefer? Also the compartment light is shot, i will have to look for something 12V/60mA or similar and shape.. Wouter g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-11.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 7 02:09:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Mark Exstedt via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:09:18 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] 680ZX Plays and FF for One Second / Right Rubber Roller not goiung Up Message-ID: When pressing play, the transport goes up (but not the front/right roller) and the left capstan engages with the pinch roller and the Cassette plays for almost one second and then the transport goes down into stop mode. When pressing FF or REW, cassette spins for almost one second and then stops. Seeking advice first as this is a 'minty' looking deck which has probably had very little use. Thank you. - Mark Exstedt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 7 12:14:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Weegenaar via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:14:22 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] 680ZX Plays and FF for One Second / Right Rubber Roller not goiung Up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1b363f6c-8dcb-e6e0-b029-8e83b2c6c3f6@bigpond.com> hi there The capstan rollers that engage with the capstan spindles use a grease that with time gets thick . they will need to be removed and cleaned regreased and reinstalled . not for the faint hearted You need gauges to set back up the guides /rollers . so be careful regards John On 7/11/2018 11:09 AM, Mark Exstedt via Naktalk wrote: > > When pressing play, the transport goes up (but not the front/right > roller) and the left capstan engages with the pinch roller and > the Cassette plays for almost one second and then the transport goes > down into stop mode. > > When pressing FF or REW, cassette spins for almost one second and then > stops. > > Seeking advice first as this is a 'minty' looking deck which has > probably had very little use. > > Thank you. - Mark Exstedt > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 7 15:49:40 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:49:40 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] 680ZX Plays and FF for One Second / Right Rubber Roller not goiung Up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It may need an auto shut off lamp. It is a small incandescent lamp in the transport located just behind the tranport control buttons. You may need to remove the front panel to access it. It is a small 12v 25ma lamp. I have found suitable replacements at wjoe.com. Good luck. On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:54 AM Mark Exstedt via Naktalk wrote: > > > When pressing play, the transport goes up (but not the front/right roller) and the left capstan engages with the pinch roller and > the Cassette plays for almost one second and then the transport goes down into stop mode. > > When pressing FF or REW, cassette spins for almost one second and then stops. > > Seeking advice first as this is a 'minty' looking deck which has probably had very little use. > > Thank you. - Mark Exstedt > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 7 15:50:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:50:13 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] 680ZX Plays and FF for One Second / Right Rubber Roller not goiung Up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Details of auto shut of lamp from service manual. On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:54 AM Mark Exstedt via Naktalk wrote: > > > When pressing play, the transport goes up (but not the front/right roller) and the left capstan engages with the pinch roller and > the Cassette plays for almost one second and then the transport goes down into stop mode. > > When pressing FF or REW, cassette spins for almost one second and then stops. > > Seeking advice first as this is a 'minty' looking deck which has probably had very little use. > > Thank you. - Mark Exstedt > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lamp.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 29065 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 680zx-shutoff.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 15834 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Nov 8 21:40:40 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Vesselin Uzunov via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 20:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi zx7 counter and calibration problems References: <1289361167.1158543.1541709640038.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1289361167.1158543.1541709640038@mail.yahoo.com> Seven months after the digital couter of my Nak zx7suddenly stop/freezed on"0000",I decided to check it again. For my suprise the counter worked and the sound was very good. But only for 2-3 minutes. Then it stopped and return itself to 0000 again. I replaced  the small electrolytic 47uF 10v on counter PCB,but it did not change anything.Now I can't calibrate the azimuth. When I press the start azimuth  button the cassette start running,but the 2 green lights did not light on and couner remain on 0000. I checked the level and bias calibratio.They work on "source "position only.The deck records pretty good without calibration, and the sound of playing back recorded cassettes is very good  to my ears.I will apreciate any help. The deck is very clean. Maybe it was used very little .Vesselin.Yahoo Mail on Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Nov 13 22:46:29 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:46:29 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 14 19:44:47 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calijente@gmx.net via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 13:44:47 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). Good luck, Axe > On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 14 20:19:08 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:19:08 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> Message-ID: <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). Good luck, Axe On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 14 21:35:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:35:46 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: Those caps do appear to be ballistics compensation for the meters, to compensate for mechanical inertia and friction. The meters might "bounce up" a bit more before they settle with a 10uf cap in place of 6.8uf. These little component testers are pretty cheap and reasonably accurate. I would test the cap for ESR and value, it may still be good, on the other hand, they are about 40 years old now. On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:24 PM calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel > > > > From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM > To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap > > > > If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. > > > > Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. > > > > Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). > > > > Good luck, > > Axe > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > > > Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 14 21:53:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calijente@gmx.net via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:53:00 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Message-ID: You’re welcome. Sure, you can do that, but be aware that 6.8 uF is a standard value. Not sure where you are, but it’s in stock at Mouser (USA). For instance, this one (you might want to double check it fits): https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Nichicon/UPM1H6R8MDD1TD?qs=sGAEpiMZZMtZ1n0r9vR22bWlSlpQNIMtuZk%252bT%2ffJuQY%3d > Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Nov 14 23:37:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:37:22 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <000001d47c6a$9caf78b0$d60e6a10$@verizon.net> I may have to order some film caps to replace those orange ones ,if so I will order the 6.8uf also -----Original Message----- From: Francis Flynn [mailto:fflynn.flynn36 at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 3:36 PM To: calman46 at verizon.net; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Those caps do appear to be ballistics compensation for the meters, to compensate for mechanical inertia and friction. The meters might "bounce up" a bit more before they settle with a 10uf cap in place of 6.8uf. These little component testers are pretty cheap and reasonably accurate. I would test the cap for ESR and value, it may still be good, on the other hand, they are about 40 years old now. On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:24 PM calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel > > > > From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM > To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap > > > > If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. > > > > Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. > > > > Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). > > > > Good luck, > > Axe > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > > > Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Nov 15 06:22:49 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:22:49 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000901d47ca3$42df4930$c89ddb90$@aol.com> Hello calman46 C150 and C250 are capacitors in the L and R meter amplifiers of a 481 or 482, and as such, make no contribution to the sonic properties of those decks. If they are defective, changing them from 6.8uF to 10uF is ok, the meters will continue to work, except that you'll change the ballistic properties of the meters just a little. If they are not defective, I can't see the point of changing them at all, especially as you seem to not have the correct values at hand. In fact, even if you did have the correct value at hand, I can't see the point in changing them. I belong to the school of thought that believes that unless parts are defective, or have a poor track record as regards reliability (eg many of the orange cap values), that there's no rational reason to replace them. Regards John Gipps Message: 1 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:46:29 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Nov 15 13:26:10 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:26:10 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <000001d47c6a$9caf78b0$d60e6a10$@verizon.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> <000001d47c6a$9caf78b0$d60e6a10$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <000f01d47cde$64ca4af0$2e5ee0d0$@verizon.net> I have question on the orange film caps . The NAKS how to page lists them as polyester the 481 SM lists as polypropylene there is a difference . Is this a typo-o or are there two kinds of orange film caps ? that need replacing ? thanks -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 5:37 PM To: 'Francis Flynn'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap I may have to order some film caps to replace those orange ones ,if so I will order the 6.8uf also -----Original Message----- From: Francis Flynn [mailto:fflynn.flynn36 at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 3:36 PM To: calman46 at verizon.net; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Those caps do appear to be ballistics compensation for the meters, to compensate for mechanical inertia and friction. The meters might "bounce up" a bit more before they settle with a 10uf cap in place of 6.8uf. These little component testers are pretty cheap and reasonably accurate. I would test the cap for ESR and value, it may still be good, on the other hand, they are about 40 years old now. On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:24 PM calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel > > > > From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM > To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap > > > > If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. > > > > Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. > > > > Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). > > > > Good luck, > > Axe > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: > > > > Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Nov 15 13:47:19 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:47:19 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <000901d47ca3$42df4930$c89ddb90$@aol.com> References: <000901d47ca3$42df4930$c89ddb90$@aol.com> Message-ID: <001001d47ce1$591744d0$0b45ce70$@verizon.net> My rational reason is these caps are nearly 40 years old and you just don't know how stable they are . Capacitors are better now than they were 20,30, 40 years old and they really make this vintage gear perform . You should hear what you're missing . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 12:23 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 Hello calman46 C150 and C250 are capacitors in the L and R meter amplifiers of a 481 or 482, and as such, make no contribution to the sonic properties of those decks. If they are defective, changing them from 6.8uF to 10uF is ok, the meters will continue to work, except that you'll change the ballistic properties of the meters just a little. If they are not defective, I can't see the point of changing them at all, especially as you seem to not have the correct values at hand. In fact, even if you did have the correct value at hand, I can't see the point in changing them. I belong to the school of thought that believes that unless parts are defective, or have a poor track record as regards reliability (eg many of the orange cap values), that there's no rational reason to replace them. Regards John Gipps Message: 1 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:46:29 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Nov 17 16:59:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 01:59:00 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <005701d47e8e$7787c7b0$66975710$@aol.com> Hi calman46 They are metallised polypropylene. If you want to use good quality film capacitors to replace orange caps and other film capacitors in your 481, the most perfect caps are polystyrene. Of the commonly available capacitors, polystyrene have the lowest dissipation factor and are closest to being ideal capacitors. Second to polystyrene are polypropylene. Polyester capacitors are lower down the food chain, and are sometimes sold as "greencaps". You can probably source polypropylene more easily than polystyrene, and these would be a good choice. Nakamichi would have chosen the polypropylene orange caps with the best intentions for their sonic quality, but it seems in hindsight that they might have chosen a poor make of polypropylene caps. Regards John Gipps Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:26:10 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'calman46'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" , "'Francis Flynn'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <000f01d47cde$64ca4af0$2e5ee0d0$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have question on the orange film caps . The NAKS how to page lists them as polyester the 481 SM lists as polypropylene there is a difference . Is this a typo-o or are there two kinds of orange film caps ? that need replacing ? thanks From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Nov 17 17:05:32 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 02:05:32 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <005901d47e8f$610b4a60$2321df20$@aol.com> Hi calman46 Even though the electrolytics in a 480 series deck are approaching 40 years old, most of them are in good serviceable condition. There's no doubt that the values of capacitance and ESR of electrolytics are less stable than those of film capacitors, but having worked on a huge number of Nakamichi decks over many decades, I can tell you that only a very small number of electrolytics in them actually cause problems, or cause degradation of audio quality. My comments regarding recapping should be seen as a comment to NakTalkers in general. My reply to you re C150 and C250 was because I thought maybe you hadn't realised that these caps were in a meter circuit, where you definitely "won't hear what you're missing". Having been in the audio industry for much of my life, I'm very aware that there are enthusiasts who recap and rechip, and replace power supply diodes with Shottkys etc etc. The readership of NalkTalk surely ranges from people who are interested in hifi but are not much into electronics, to people who are professionals in the industry and are hifi and electronic experts. While there is often discussion about recapping and other similar practices, there is rarely a dissenting view expressed. Those who aren't into electronics could be forgiven for forming the view that every bit of audio equipment benefits from recapping etc. My experience with customers who have recapped their decks, or who have unwittingly bought a recapped deck, is that many of those decks have been converted to unreliable junk in the process. While some people can desolder and remove components beautifully, and then replace them with well-chosen and superior parts and solder them in beautifully, I find that this is rare. In recapping a Nakamichi deck, many dozens of parts are removed and replaced. When dozens of parts are replaced there is a good chance that problems will be experienced in those decks subsequently. I know this to be the case because I've received many such units for repair from customers over the years. I hope this email sparks some lively discussion in the NakTalk community. I'd be very interested to hear what people think on this subject. Regards John Gipps Message: 2 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:47:19 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'John Gipps'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 Message-ID: <001001d47ce1$591744d0$0b45ce70$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" My rational reason is these caps are nearly 40 years old and you just don't know how stable they are . Capacitors are better now than they were 20,30, 40 years old and they really make this vintage gear perform . You should hear what you're missing . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 12:23 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 Hello calman46 C150 and C250 are capacitors in the L and R meter amplifiers of a 481 or 482, and as such, make no contribution to the sonic properties of those decks. If they are defective, changing them from 6.8uF to 10uF is ok, the meters will continue to work, except that you'll change the ballistic properties of the meters just a little. If they are not defective, I can't see the point of changing them at all, especially as you seem to not have the correct values at hand. In fact, even if you did have the correct value at hand, I can't see the point in changing them. I belong to the school of thought that believes that unless parts are defective, or have a poor track record as regards reliability (eg many of the orange cap values), that there's no rational reason to replace them. Regards John Gipps Message: 1 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:46:29 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Nov 17 20:32:00 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:32:00 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 In-Reply-To: <005901d47e8f$610b4a60$2321df20$@aol.com> References: <005901d47e8f$610b4a60$2321df20$@aol.com> Message-ID: <201811171932.wAHJW0nb009196@mail32c7.megamailservers.com> I don't have near the experience you do John, but totally agree with your point of view on this, :) Even times when it is justified to replace a number of caps it would be better to replace them in multiple passes confirming that results are as expected between passes. Cheers, Rainer S. On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 02:05:32 +1000, John Gipps via Naktalk wrote: Hi calman46 Even though the electrolytics in a 480 series deck are approaching 40 years old, most of them are in good serviceable condition. There's no doubt that the values of capacitance and ESR of electrolytics are less stable than those of film capacitors, but having worked on a huge number of Nakamichi decks over many decades, I can tell you that only a very small number of electrolytics in them actually cause problems, or cause degradation of audio quality. My comments regarding recapping should be seen as a comment to NakTalkers in general. My reply to you re C150 and C250 was because I thought maybe you hadn't realised that these caps were in a meter circuit, where you definitely "won't hear what you're missing". Having been in the audio industry for much of my life, I'm very aware that there are enthusiasts who recap and rechip, and replace power supply diodes with Shottkys etc etc. The readership of NalkTalk surely ranges from people who are interested in hifi but are not much into electronics, to people who are professionals in the industry and are hifi and electronic experts. While there is often discussion about recapping and other similar practices, there is rarely a dissenting view expressed. Those who aren't into electronics could be forgiven for forming the view that every bit of audio equipment benefits from recapping etc. My experience with customers who have recapped their decks, or who have unwittingly bought a recapped deck, is that many of those decks have been converted to unreliable junk in the process. While some people can desolder and remove components beautifully, and then replace them with well-chosen and superior parts and solder them in beautifully, I find that this is rare. In recapping a Nakamichi deck, many dozens of parts are removed and replaced. When dozens of parts are replaced there is a good chance that problems will be experienced in those decks subsequently. I know this to be the case because I've received many such units for repair from customers over the years. I hope this email sparks some lively discussion in the NakTalk community. I'd be very interested to hear what people think on this subject. Regards John Gipps Message: 2 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:47:19 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: "'John Gipps'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 Message-ID: <001001d47ce1$591744d0$0b45ce70$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" My rational reason is these caps are nearly 40 years old and you just don't know how stable they are . Capacitors are better now than they were 20,30, 40 years old and they really make this vintage gear perform . You should hear what you're missing . -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 12:23 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 Hello calman46 C150 and C250 are capacitors in the L and R meter amplifiers of a 481 or 482, and as such, make no contribution to the sonic properties of those decks. If they are defective, changing them from 6.8uF to 10uF is ok, the meters will continue to work, except that you'll change the ballistic properties of the meters just a little. If they are not defective, I can't see the point of changing them at all, especially as you seem to not have the correct values at hand. In fact, even if you did have the correct value at hand, I can't see the point in changing them. I belong to the school of thought that believes that unless parts are defective, or have a poor track record as regards reliability (eg many of the orange cap values), that there's no rational reason to replace them. Regards John Gipps Message: 1 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:46:29 -0500 From: calman46 via Naktalk To: Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Message-ID: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Nov 17 20:30:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Mark Exstedt via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 19:30:45 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon - Not FF, REW and PLAY All the Way thru a Tape Message-ID: Let my two Dragons sit around unused too long. Both are not FF, REW, or Playing all the way thru a 90 minute cassette side. What's the problem ? Want to be the first to wish the group a Happy Holiday Season. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Nov 18 06:54:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Weegenaar via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:54:26 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 In-Reply-To: <005901d47e8f$610b4a60$2321df20$@aol.com> References: <005901d47e8f$610b4a60$2321df20$@aol.com> Message-ID: Hi everyone . Having fully replaced all Orange caps and all electolytics in my 680zx , I find  it slightly more detailed and sweeter . I used pretty good caps through out but did not use crazy size caps where the orange drops had been . I did replace all the 1uf caps    that where electo caps with good film polyester. The sonic signature has changed but The 680zx is open and sweet with great bass Regards John Weegenaar Ps John Gipps I understand you live in Brisbane ?? All the best > Hi calman46 > > > Even though the electrolytics in a 480 series deck are approaching 40 years old, most of them are in good serviceable condition. There's no doubt that the values of capacitance and ESR of electrolytics are less stable than those of film capacitors, but having worked on a huge number of Nakamichi decks over many decades, I can tell you that only a very small number of electrolytics in them actually cause problems, or cause degradation of audio quality. > > My comments regarding recapping should be seen as a comment to NakTalkers in general. My reply to you re C150 and C250 was because I thought maybe you hadn't realised that these caps were in a meter circuit, where you definitely "won't hear what you're missing". Having been in the audio industry for much of my life, I'm very aware that there are enthusiasts who recap and rechip, and replace power supply diodes with Shottkys etc etc. The readership of NalkTalk surely ranges from people who are interested in hifi but are not much into electronics, to people who are professionals in the industry and are hifi and electronic experts. While there is often discussion about recapping and other similar practices, there is rarely a dissenting view expressed. Those who aren't into electronics could be forgiven for forming the view that every bit of audio equipment benefits from recapping etc. My experience with customers who have recapped their decks, or who have unwittingly bought a recapped deck, is that many of those decks have been converted to unreliable junk in the process. While some people can desolder and remove components beautifully, and then replace them with well-chosen and superior parts and solder them in beautifully, I find that this is rare. In recapping a Nakamichi deck, many dozens of parts are removed and replaced. When dozens of parts are replaced there is a good chance that problems will be experienced in those decks subsequently. I know this to be the case because I've received many such units for repair from customers over the years. > > I hope this email sparks some lively discussion in the NakTalk community. I'd be very interested to hear what people think on this subject. > > Regards > > John Gipps > > > > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:47:19 -0500 > From: calman46 via Naktalk > To: "'John Gipps'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi > Cassette Decks'" > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 > Message-ID: <001001d47ce1$591744d0$0b45ce70$@verizon.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > My rational reason is these caps are nearly 40 years old and you just don't know how stable they are . Capacitors are better now than they were 20,30, 40 years old and they really make this vintage gear perform . You should hear what you're missing . > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of John Gipps via Naktalk > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 12:23 AM > To: naktalk at lists.naks.com; naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 5 > > > Hello calman46 > > C150 and C250 are capacitors in the L and R meter amplifiers of a 481 or 482, and as such, make no contribution to the sonic properties of those decks. > > If they are defective, changing them from 6.8uF to 10uF is ok, the meters will continue to work, except that you'll change the ballistic properties of the meters just a little. If they are not defective, I can't see the point of changing them at all, especially as you seem to not have the correct values at hand. In fact, even if you did have the correct value at hand, I can't see the point in changing them. I belong to the school of thought that believes that unless parts are defective, or have a poor track record as regards reliability (eg many of the orange cap values), that there's no rational reason to replace them. > > Regards > > John Gipps > > > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:46:29 -0500 > From: calman46 via Naktalk > To: > Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap > Message-ID: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 > .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Nov 18 15:11:34 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:11:34 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000001d47f48$9f7e62a0$de7b27e0$@aol.com> Hi John Yes I'm in Brisbane. Regards John Gipps Message: 5 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:54:26 +1000 From: Weegenaar via Naktalk To: John Gipps via Naktalk Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Hi everyone . Having fully replaced all Orange caps and all electolytics in my 680zx , I find it slightly more detailed and sweeter . I used pretty good caps through out but did not use crazy size caps where the orange drops had been . I did replace all the 1uf caps that where electo caps with good film polyester. The sonic signature has changed but The 680zx is open and sweet with great bass Regards John Weegenaar Ps John Gipps I understand you live in Brisbane ?? All the best From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Nov 18 15:20:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:20:04 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000501d47f49$d0092f30$701b8d90$@aol.com> Hi Rainer That's a really good approach. Better to be troubleshooting two parts than twenty. Regards John Gipps Message: 3 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:32:00 -0500 From: Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: Re: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 Message-ID: <201811171932.wAHJW0nb009196 at mail32c7.megamailservers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't have near the experience you do John, but totally agree with your point of view on this, :) Even times when it is justified to replace a number of caps it would be better to replace them in multiple passes confirming that results are as expected between passes. Cheers, Rainer S. On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 02:05:32 +1000, John Gipps via Naktalk wrote: Hi calman46 Even though the electrolytics in a 480 series deck are approaching 40 years old, most of them are in good serviceable condition. There's no doubt that the values of capacitance and ESR of electrolytics are less stable than those of film capacitors, but having worked on a huge number of Nakamichi decks over many decades, I can tell you that only a very small number of electrolytics in them actually cause problems, or cause degradation of audio quality. My comments regarding recapping should be seen as a comment to NakTalkers in general. My reply to you re C150 and C250 was because I thought maybe you hadn't realised that these caps were in a meter circuit, where you definitely "won't hear what you're missing". Having been in the audio industry for much of my life, I'm very aware that there are enthusiasts who recap and rechip, and replace power supply diodes with Shottkys etc etc. The readership of NalkTalk surely ranges from people who are interested in hifi but are not much into electronics, to people who are professionals in the industry and are hifi and electronic experts. While there is often discussion about recapping and other similar practices, there is rarely a dissenting view expressed. Those who aren't into electronics could be forgiven for forming the view that every bit of audio equipment benefits from recapping etc. My experience with customers who have recapped their decks, or who have unwittingly bought a recapped deck, is that many of those decks have been converted to unreliable junk in the process. While some people can desolder and remove components beautifully, and then replace them with well-chosen and superior parts and solder them in beautifully, I find that this is rare. In recapping a Nakamichi deck, many dozens of parts are removed and replaced. When dozens of parts are replaced there is a good chance that problems will be experienced in those decks subsequently. I know this to be the case because I've received many such units for repair from customers over the years. I hope this email sparks some lively discussion in the NakTalk community. I'd be very interested to hear what people think on this subject. Regards John Gipps From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Nov 30 01:10:40 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:10:40 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:19 PM To: calijente at gmx.net; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). Good luck, Axe On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Nov 30 01:20:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calman46 via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:20:22 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] nak 481 recap In-Reply-To: <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> References: <00ec01d47b9a$56167780$02436680$@verizon.net> <05804A4B-64BD-4682-8DC0-8FD348BC4458@gmx.net> <008701d47c4e$eb191590$c14b40b0$@verizon.net> <014a01d48841$21613ee0$6423bca0$@verizon.net> Message-ID: <015e01d48842$7c6dd9a0$75498ce0$@verizon.net> The voltages I checked are all good From: calman46 [mailto:calman46 at verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 7:11 PM To: 'calman46'; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: RE: [naktalk] nak 481 recap The new Nichicon KL 6.8uf worked fine . The deck plays fine but I'm having trouble with record , ZX works but needs tweaking I think (unbalanced R&L), SX and EX , are very weak I can barely hear the recorded signal. I did check the decks record function before recapping but only by the decks meters ,I didn't playback the recorded tape. The meters work on the incoming signal and playback. I rechecked all the caps, cleaned the switches a couple of times . The Record/ Play switch is clean. Everything points to the SX switch ,there is no connections to the actual EX switch it just disengages the other two (ZX,SX). Any suggestions on what the problem could be ? From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of calman46 via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:19 PM To: calijente at gmx.net; 'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks' Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap Thanks Axe for taking the time to look at the schematic , I should have posted more info. That 6.8uf value made me question upping the value . I think I'll m try a 3.3uf x 2 or 4.7uf + 2.2uf in parallel From: calijente at gmx.net [mailto:calijente at gmx.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:45 PM To: calman46; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] nak 481 recap If I understand correctly that circuit, the role of those capacitors is to compensate for the sluggishness of the needles on the analog meters (due to internal friction). The capacitors will very briefly increase the amplitude of the voltage presented to the meters after a sudden increase of the input signal, making the signal peaks easier to see and the needles look more responsive. Hard to tell what exactly increasing their value from 6.8 uF to 10 uF would do. I predict the needles will move a bit slower and the peaks of the signal might also be shown as a little bit lower with 10 uF instead of 6.8 uf. By how much? Well, you’ll tell us. Of course, there will be no audible difference, as the C150 and C250 are not in the audio signal path sent to the output of the deck. Also, of course, there might be a tiny audible difference on recordings whose levels were adjusted by the operator based on what was shown on the less responsive meters at the time of recording (the peaks on the meters might be higher than they appear). Good luck, Axe On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, calman46 via Naktalk wrote: Hello Naks, I am recapping a 481 deck and there two 6.8uf caps C150 & C250 .Can I up value to 10uf ? thanks ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.nakscom/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-2.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Feb 2 10:24:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:24:16 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? Message-ID: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> Dear Naktalkers, Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost nothing on the rigth channel. However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: both levels were equal. And of course, I could repeat this on and on. I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did not notice any wire in bad shape. Any clue where to look ? Best whishes Bernard From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Feb 2 15:54:11 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Richard L. Hess via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:54:11 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> References: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, Bernard, These problems are so annoying! If you unplugged the right RCA and the level came back, my first assumption would be the problem is external to the Nak. Is the shell of the RCA jack actually grounded to the deck? If it is not, try a clip lead or a piece of wire and connect the shell of the right RCA jack to the shell of the left RCA jack. If the level goes away, then there is an internal problem with the Nak's output wiring. Also try Right RCA shell to a bare metal place on the deck (paint is your enemy here, it's an insulator). The above test will let you know if the right RCA jack is miswired (hot and shield flipped) which could provide these symptoms. I would also use a multitester on ohms/continuity and look for shorts in the external cable. Also try plugging in the external cable backwards L->R and R->L. Does the problem still happen? Does it stay in the right channel or does it move? The only other thing that I can think of at the moment is that if it happens only on the right channel there is a short circuit at the RCA jack in the Nak that is being activated somehow by the insertion of the RCA plug. It might be a fine wire or solder splash. Beyond that, there could be some issues with the output mute circuit if it's anything like the Dragon (which is the only Nak I know details on), but I think you'll get some good clues performing the above simple tests. Cheers, Richard On 2018-02-02 4:24 AM, bb via Naktalk wrote: > Dear Naktalkers, > > Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a > RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. > > During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth > channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the > led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. > > I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost > nothing on the rigth channel. > However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, > everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could > verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: > both levels were equal. > And of course, I could repeat this on and on. > > I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground > ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, > everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP > mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) > > I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. > The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. > > I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did > not notice any wire in bad shape. > > Any clue where to look ? > > Best whishes > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > >          Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > >                        Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -- Richard L. Hess email: richard at richardhess.com Aurora, Ontario, Canada http://www.richardhess.com/ http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 3 05:01:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 04:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> References: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2114002050.2424820.1517630486115@mail.yahoo.com> If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable is plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting out that channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring you also removed the short. Again, a guess.Bob N From: bb via Naktalk To: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? Dear Naktalkers, Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost nothing on the rigth channel. However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: both levels were equal. And of course, I could repeat this on and on. I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did not notice any wire in bad shape. Any clue where to look ? Best whishes Bernard ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 3 11:11:02 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Birger Glosimot via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 11:11:02 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] 482 does not react on commands Message-ID: <000001d39cd7$4c0fc540$e42f4fc0$@tilkoblet.net> Emne: 482 does not react on commands I have changed belts and idler on my 482 after buying it as a repair object. When pressing play, FF, or record, nothing happens. Rew. gives a short reaction (starts, but stops in a second) I also have a 482Z, so to check if there were any transport faults, I removed the transport from the 482 and connected it to the Z version. All well, so no transport fault. Then there should be a problem in the power supply line (main pcb or control pcb)? But where do I start measuring? I´m not good at reading such from the service manual. So suggestions please. Birger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 3 11:05:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 11:05:09 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: <2114002050.2424820.1517630486115@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> <2114002050.2424820.1517630486115@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5A758955.2050100@gmail.com> Yes, but I did swap the cable of the RCA to rule it out : same problem whatever cable is used. Same with the RCA plate: I had a spare one that I installed: no improvment. I think that effectively, when I plug a RCA in, I create a sort but the latter is localized inside the deck. Bob Naylor a écrit : > If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable is > plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting out > that channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring you > also removed the short. Again, a guess. > Bob N > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* bb via Naktalk > *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM > *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? > > Dear Naktalkers, > > Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a > RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. > > During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth > channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the > led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. > > I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost > nothing on the rigth channel. > However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, > everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could > verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: > both levels were equal. > And of course, I could repeat this on and on. > > I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground > ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, > everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP > mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) > > I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. > The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. > > I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did not > notice any wire in bad shape. > > Any clue where to look ? > > Best whishes > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com > mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 3 10:29:02 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 10:29:02 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: <2114002050.2424820.1517630486115@mail.yahoo.com> References: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> <2114002050.2424820.1517630486115@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Bernard I get confused when you write about "ground noise" and "RCA plate". Do you mean an RCA connector? Chassis connector? but what means with "a significant ground noise"? Ingemar 2018-02-03 5:01 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk : > If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable is > plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting out that > channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring you also removed > the short. Again, a guess. > Bob N > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* bb via Naktalk > *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM > *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? > > Dear Naktalkers, > > Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a > RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. > > During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth > channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the > led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. > > I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost > nothing on the rigth channel. > However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, > everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could > verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: > both levels were equal. > And of course, I could repeat this on and on. > > I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground > ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, > everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP > mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) > > I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. > The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. > > I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did not > notice any wire in bad shape. > > Any clue where to look ? > > Best whishes > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 3 23:58:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 23:58:38 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: References: <5A742E40.2030101@gmail.com> <2114002050.2424820.1517630486115@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5A763E9E.7000506@gmail.com> I mean the plastic plate that contains the 4 RCA connectors, and maintained to the back panel by two screws, one of them maintaining a ring pinched between the chassis and the plastic plate to put the ground part of the RCA to....ground. "signifcanat ground noise" means that clearly this noise is heard at a too high level, as compared for exemple with another deck Bernard Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : > Hi Bernard > > I get confused when you write about "ground noise" and "RCA plate". Do > you mean an RCA connector? Chassis connector? but what means with "a > significant ground noise"? > > Ingemar > > 2018-02-03 5:01 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk > >: > > If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable > is plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting > out that channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring > you also removed the short. Again, a guess. > Bob N > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* bb via Naktalk > > *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM > *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? > > Dear Naktalkers, > > Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a > RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. > > During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth > channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the > led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. > > I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost > nothing on the rigth channel. > However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, > everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could > verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: > both levels were equal. > And of course, I could repeat this on and on. > > I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the > ground > ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, > everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP > mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) > > I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. > The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. > > I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and > did not > notice any wire in bad shape. > > Any clue where to look ? > > Best whishes > Bernard > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com > mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com > mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Feb 6 07:05:20 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (compudude via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:05:20 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49a5f714-6af8-8803-a24f-d461e2090953@compuserve.com> Hi Bernard, Here are the steps I performed on my rx-505 to get rid of the AC humming problem, which I posted cople of years ago: Removed 3 screws from power supply board (heatsink) from the chassis. Cleaned them up (remove any corrosion) and tighten back. Tighten down all screws holding the heatsink on the power supply board. Clean the oxidization on the ring connected to ground wire (on one of the heatsink screws) Clean the grounding ring at the audio in/out connector. I also removed the dolby card and cleaned its connectors, but this step probably does not matter. Hope this helps, _Fuad On 02/04/2018 03:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: > Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to > naktalk at lists.naks.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > naktalk-request at lists.naks.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." > > > Naktalk digest mailing list > > Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to > get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, > don't go with digest mode. > > If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. > > Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: RX-505E: ground loop ? (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) > 2. Re: RX-505E: ground loop ? (bb via Naktalk) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 10:29:02 +0100 > From: Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk > To: Bob Naylor , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette > Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Bernard > > I get confused when you write about "ground noise" and "RCA plate". Do you > mean an RCA connector? Chassis connector? but what means with "a > significant ground noise"? > > Ingemar > > 2018-02-03 5:01 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk : > >> If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable is >> plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting out that >> channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring you also removed >> the short. Again, a guess. >> Bob N >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* bb via Naktalk >> *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >> *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM >> *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? >> >> Dear Naktalkers, >> >> Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a >> RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. >> >> During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth >> channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the >> led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. >> >> I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost >> nothing on the rigth channel. >> However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, >> everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could >> verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: >> both levels were equal. >> And of course, I could repeat this on and on. >> >> I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground >> ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, >> everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP >> mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) >> >> I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. >> The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. >> >> I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did not >> notice any wire in bad shape. >> >> Any clue where to look ? >> >> Best whishes >> Bernard >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 23:58:38 +0100 > From: bb via Naktalk > To: Ingemar Lindqvist > Cc: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? > Message-ID: <5A763E9E.7000506 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I mean the plastic plate that contains the 4 RCA connectors, and > maintained to the back panel by two screws, one of them maintaining a > ring pinched between the chassis and the plastic plate to put the ground > part of the RCA to....ground. > > "signifcanat ground noise" means that clearly this noise is heard at a > too high level, as compared for exemple with another deck > > Bernard > > Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : >> Hi Bernard >> >> I get confused when you write about "ground noise" and "RCA plate". Do >> you mean an RCA connector? Chassis connector? but what means with "a >> significant ground noise"? >> >> Ingemar >> >> 2018-02-03 5:01 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk >> >: >> >> If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable >> is plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting >> out that channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring >> you also removed the short. Again, a guess. >> Bob N >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* bb via Naktalk > > >> *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > >> *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM >> *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? >> >> Dear Naktalkers, >> >> Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a >> RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. >> >> During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth >> channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the >> led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. >> >> I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost >> nothing on the rigth channel. >> However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, >> everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could >> verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: >> both levels were equal. >> And of course, I could repeat this on and on. >> >> I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the >> ground >> ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, >> everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP >> mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) >> >> I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. >> The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. >> >> I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and >> did not >> notice any wire in bad shape. >> >> Any clue where to look ? >> >> Best whishes >> Bernard >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com >> mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: >> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com >> mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: >> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 > *************************************** From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Feb 6 09:04:10 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:04:10 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? In-Reply-To: <49a5f714-6af8-8803-a24f-d461e2090953@compuserve.com> References: <49a5f714-6af8-8803-a24f-d461e2090953@compuserve.com> Message-ID: <5A79617A.30907@gmail.com> OK, I will try this but I think that the problem could come from a "mute" problem which is actually activated by plugging in a RCA in the rigth output channel. This happens whatever the cable employed, and with or without an extra cable to make sure the back RCA plate is grounded to the chassis. I have checked the VR PCB components, I have checked Q11, Q112 and Q113 in the rigth channel part on the VM-7 (O.Mute) line. Nothinh wrong... Bernard compudude via Naktalk a écrit : > Hi Bernard, > > Here are the steps I performed on my rx-505 to get rid of the AC > humming problem, which I posted cople of years ago: > > Removed 3 screws from power supply board (heatsink) from the chassis. > Cleaned them up (remove any corrosion) and tighten back. > > Tighten down all screws holding the heatsink on the power supply board. > > Clean the oxidization on the ring connected to ground wire (on one of > the heatsink screws) > > Clean the grounding ring at the audio in/out connector. > > I also removed the dolby card and cleaned its connectors, but this step > probably does not matter. > > > Hope this helps, > _Fuad > > On 02/04/2018 03:00 AM, via Naktalk wrote: >> Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to >> naktalk at lists.naks.com >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> naktalk-request at lists.naks.com >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." >> >> >> Naktalk digest mailing list >> >> Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good >> suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to >> want to >> get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. >> Otherwise, >> don't go with digest mode. >> >> If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove >> the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the >> reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. >> >> Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these >> precautions may get discarded. >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: RX-505E: ground loop ? (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) >> 2. Re: RX-505E: ground loop ? (bb via Naktalk) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 10:29:02 +0100 >> From: Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk >> To: Bob Naylor , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette >> Decks >> Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? >> Message-ID: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hi Bernard >> >> I get confused when you write about "ground noise" and "RCA plate". >> Do you >> mean an RCA connector? Chassis connector? but what means with "a >> significant ground noise"? >> >> Ingemar >> >> 2018-02-03 5:01 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk >> : >> >>> If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable is >>> plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting out >>> that >>> channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring you also >>> removed >>> the short. Again, a guess. >>> Bob N >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* bb via Naktalk >>> *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >>> *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM >>> *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? >>> >>> Dear Naktalkers, >>> >>> Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a >>> RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. >>> >>> During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth >>> channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 while the >>> led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. >>> >>> I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost >>> nothing on the rigth channel. >>> However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, >>> everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I could >>> verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the T-100: >>> both levels were equal. >>> And of course, I could repeat this on and on. >>> >>> I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the ground >>> ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, >>> everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in STOP >>> mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the headphones.) >>> >>> I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. >>> The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. >>> >>> I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and did not >>> notice any wire in bad shape. >>> >>> Any clue where to look ? >>> >>> Best whishes >>> Bernard >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 23:58:38 +0100 >> From: bb via Naktalk >> To: Ingemar Lindqvist >> Cc: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >> Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? >> Message-ID: <5A763E9E.7000506 at gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed >> >> I mean the plastic plate that contains the 4 RCA connectors, and >> maintained to the back panel by two screws, one of them maintaining a >> ring pinched between the chassis and the plastic plate to put the ground >> part of the RCA to....ground. >> >> "signifcanat ground noise" means that clearly this noise is heard at a >> too high level, as compared for exemple with another deck >> >> Bernard >> >> Ingemar Lindqvist a écrit : >>> Hi Bernard >>> >>> I get confused when you write about "ground noise" and "RCA plate". Do >>> you mean an RCA connector? Chassis connector? but what means with "a >>> significant ground noise"? >>> >>> Ingemar >>> >>> 2018-02-03 5:01 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk >>> >: >>> >>> If I understand correctly you lose the audio when the output cable >>> is plugged in. My guess is the cable has a short which is shorting >>> out that channel when plugged in. When you removed the ground ring >>> you also removed the short. Again, a guess. >>> Bob N >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* bb via Naktalk >> > >>> *To:* Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >> > >>> *Sent:* Friday, February 2, 2018 1:24 AM >>> *Subject:* [naktalk] RX-505E: ground loop ? >>> >>> Dear Naktalkers, >>> >>> Sorry to bother again but I have now a strange "phenomenon" on a >>> RX-505E. All the transport has been rejuvanated and calibrated. >>> >>> During the process of tuning the azimuth, I noticed that the rigth >>> channel level was much lower than the left one on the T-100 >>> while the >>> led-meter of the deck indicated equal levels of both channels. >>> >>> I plugged in my headphones and verified that indeed, I had almost >>> nothing on the rigth channel. >>> However, when I unpluged the rigth RCA from the back of the deck, >>> everything became "normal" that is the rigth level was back. I >>> could >>> verify this by connecting the output of the headphones to the >>> T-100: >>> both levels were equal. >>> And of course, I could repeat this on and on. >>> >>> I changed the RCA plate : no change! However, when I remove the >>> ground >>> ring of the RCA plate that is screwed to the back of the deck, >>> everything is OK in PLAY mode (I do have this phenomenon but in >>> STOP >>> mode, I can hear a quite significant ground noise in the >>> headphones.) >>> >>> I checked the 4 transistors and the 2 BP caps of the VR PCB: OK. >>> The OUTPUT VR must be OK since it works well for the headphones. >>> >>> I checked on the way from the PB head down to the RCA plate and >>> did not >>> notice any wire in bad shape. >>> >>> Any clue where to look ? >>> >>> Best whishes >>> Bernard >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com >>> mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com >>> mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: >> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 >> *************************************** > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: > http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 7 09:35:28 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Marcus James via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 19:35:28 +1100 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon service in Oz Message-ID: I need to find someone to fix the record head alignment on my Dragon in Australia. As far as I understand Russell Storey of Stone’s Sound Studio is on hiatus. Does anyone have an alternative? Kind regards From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 7 12:43:29 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Thompson via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 21:43:29 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon service in Oz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5A7AE661.5000509@internode.on.net> John Gipps in Brisbane is the best if he is doing any Nak work nowadays. Also in Brisbane is Bala Ganesh Chandra. Either may take some time. > Marcus James via Naktalk > 7 February 2018 at 6:35 pm > I need to find someone to fix the record head alignment on my Dragon > in Australia. > > As far as I understand Russell Storey of Stone’s Sound Studio is on > hiatus. > Does anyone have an alternative? > > Kind regards > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Regards David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 7 15:00:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 00:00:46 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Problems with Nakamichi PA-350 Mobile Amplifier - alan505 Message-ID: <004101d3a01c$10124e80$3036eb80$@aol.com> Hi Alan The PA-350 does have some issues. I repaired a few of them in the early nineties, and the majority of problems related to instability in the amplifiers. The four power amplifiers have a tendency to oscillate parasitically. This tends to occur around 300KHz to 400KHz, and can cause the amplifiers to draw very heavy currents from the power supply - whether or not they are outputting audio. Parasitic oscillation can also cause very significant heating in the amplifiers themselves, as it causes cross-conduction in the output transistors. It sounds as though the D-D converter in your PA-350 has run pretty hot at some stage, damaging the resistors that you've mentioned, and quite possibly the semiconductors driving the D-D converter transformer. This may or may not be related to problems with the amplifiers. If I was repairing your PA-350, I would disconnect the four power amplifiers from the power supply, and get the power supply working correctly first. The resistors that you mention, R413 to R420 should all be present - to answer your question, there hasn't been any tech bulletin recommending removal of any of them. Yours have clearly been overheated, damaging the solder joints, and causing some repairer to remove ones that were possibly burnt out. I would remove all the remaining 47Ω 2W resistors and test their values. They are used in pairs soldered in parallel – so they make up four resistors of value 23.5Ω and rated at 4W. They do all need to be present, and all need to be about the same value – you don’t currently have that situation. You could consider replacing each pair with a 22Ω or 24Ω 5W PW5 type resistor (so you could use 4 X 22Ω 5W PW5 resistors, or of course, you could source however many 47Ω 2W resistors as needed to make up eight in good condition – the PW5 types are easy to source.) You need to check Q403, Q404, Q405, Q406, Q407, and Q408. I would do normal junction tests on them, and also Vce breakdown voltage tests. Repairing a PA-350 is not for the faint hearted – you will need a CRO to look at waveforms in the D-D converter – it would be good if you can also test transistor breakdown voltages, so a comprehensive transistor tester would come in handy both for the power supply and the four amplifiers. There are adjustments to be made in the power supply – dead time (VR401) and output voltage under load (VR402, VR403). If you get the power supply working, you could then connect up the four amplifiers and test for any RF on the outputs (the 300KHz parasitic) with a CRO. If one or more are oscillating, I can give you some mods to stop this from happening. Fortunately, most can be made to behave correctly with only a small number of changes. Good luck. Get in touch if you have questions. John Gipps Message: 4 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:36:03 -0600 From: alan505 via Naktalk < naktalk at lists.naks.com> To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Question about possible missing resistors on PA-350 Mobile Amp Message-ID: < CABXs_0xaJJsp0gZP89PWE2EmiQ+VEHjLcumGhKNrh=n2_p+7PA at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm setting up a vintage Nakamichi Mobile Audio system in a project car and have been performing some Q/A on my components before I "commit" them to their locations. I have a Mobile Audio Series PA-350 35w x4 amp that I am using to drive 4 tweeters. The amp appears to have a few issues as the only output is a pulsating pop every 5 seconds or so. I pulled the lid off and started checking the state of the grounds when I noticed that two of the resistors on the D/D converter PCB had solder pad cracks, one actually having popped out of the hole. The resistors are the 47Ohm 2w fail-safe resistors on R413 to R420. A closer inspection indicated that R415 & R417 had cracks, but R416 & R418 were actually missing from the board. I'm scratching my head on this one because it appears that something was there from the factory as the pads contain solder, with one end left open. The PA-350 service manual schematic shows resistors in these locations, so could this be someone's mod or the result of a technical bulletin? I'm curious to see if anyone else has encountered missing resistors at this location. Also, any recommendations of "fail safe" resistors if it turns out that they are needed? Thanks, Alan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 7 15:57:28 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Gipps via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 00:57:28 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <006701d3a023$fc0b39d0$f421ad70$@aol.com> Hi Marcus I was just poking about in the archives, and noticed an email from David Thompson in answer to your enquiry for a Nak tech in Oz. Hi David - thanks for recommending me, and I hope life is treating you well. I'm not able to take on repair jobs just now - I will be returning to Nak and hi-end audio repairs later this year. I would definitely recommend Bala if he's doing repairs at the moment. Regards John Gipps Message: 1 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 19:35:28 +1100 From: Marcus James via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Dragon service in Oz Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 I need to find someone to fix the record head alignment on my Dragon in Australia. As far as I understand Russell Storey of Stone’s Sound Studio is on hiatus. Does anyone have an alternative? Kind regards From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 7 18:41:11 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Larry Weiner via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:41:11 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi Service in metro DC/suburban Maryland Message-ID: <91b93c0b-293a-5fcd-b91e-c5a16b91e451@larryweiner.com> I own a Nak BX-125, and the belts have begun slipping (and should be replaced), and I suspect the head alignment might need to be checked and adjusted.  Does anyone have any recommendations.  (I used to take my equipment to Audio Clinic in Silver Spring but they are not answering their phone and perhaps are no longer in business). Larry Weiner larweiner at gmail.com From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 7 20:02:52 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:02:52 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi Service in metro DC/suburban Maryland In-Reply-To: <91b93c0b-293a-5fcd-b91e-c5a16b91e451@larryweiner.com> References: <91b93c0b-293a-5fcd-b91e-c5a16b91e451@larryweiner.com> Message-ID: <010101d3a046$4319b730$c94d2590$@twc.com> There's a place in Louisville, KY, called Magnetic Tape Recorder, Inc. that you could use. I've had them do repairs, and I have bought equipment from them (a Pioneer RT-909 that I love!). If you want more information ,write back and I can find a phone number for you. Call and talk with them, at least, if you're interested in shipping your equipment. Les Morgan Lanesville, IN -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Larry Weiner via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 12:41 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi Service in metro DC/suburban Maryland I own a Nak BX-125, and the belts have begun slipping (and should be replaced), and I suspect the head alignment might need to be checked and adjusted. Does anyone have any recommendations. (I used to take my equipment to Audio Clinic in Silver Spring but they are not answering their phone and perhaps are no longer in business). Larry Weiner larweiner at gmail.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 11 00:04:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:04:01 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Patty, TD-700 flap Message-ID: <20180210170401.cca0tbzu0o4kgc80@webmail.sasktel.net> Hi Patty, your email doesn't seem to be working and I was wondering if you found out how much money you needed for shipping that flap, or even if you got the email with my friends address? My email is still the same.   Cheers, Rainer S. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 10 23:49:28 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:49:28 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX-300 Volume Control Message-ID: <7e7ab7f1-f8fe-0327-cc6e-353bbdb9d34e@acm.org> My BX-300 volume control slider makes a scratchy & static sound when I slide it. What is recommended to clean these slider volume controls and the level controls? Would you use CAIG Deoxit D5 or Deoxit Fader F5 or something else or even both? From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 11 01:16:54 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rodrigo via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 22:16:54 -0200 Subject: [naktalk] Parts - help Message-ID: <201A84DB-621F-4963-9B4D-546B67475110@terra.com.br> Hi everyone, I just bought an RX202 that seemed to be just fine and after a few days of use my tech found out that the controlling eprom was going crazy. I also need a little motor (please see pics below). Does anybody have any suggestions on how to replace the chip or repair the motor? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image1.png Type: image/png Size: 1667189 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Nakamichi VA700B04 Motor Vintage Cassette Deck Repair Any help will be more than welcome! Thank you. Rodrigo Krause Sent from my iPhone From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 11 17:04:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:04:46 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX-300 Volume Control Message-ID: <6e7c0b7e-bc28-5efd-e9ef-9533560d3752@acm.org> My BX-300 volume control slider makes a scratchy & static sound through the deck's output when I slide it. What is recommended to clean these slider volume controls and the level controls? Would you use CAIG Deoxit D5 or Deoxit Fader F5 or something else or even both? From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 11 18:17:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 12:17:01 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX-300 Volume Control In-Reply-To: <6e7c0b7e-bc28-5efd-e9ef-9533560d3752@acm.org> References: <6e7c0b7e-bc28-5efd-e9ef-9533560d3752@acm.org> Message-ID: <005401d3a35c$22cff890$686fe9b0$@twc.com> Clean it first with the Deoxit cleaner, then lube it with the Deoxit lube. My opinion, not a pro...but used enough of the stuff to love it. Les -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of via Naktalk Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 11:05 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] BX-300 Volume Control My BX-300 volume control slider makes a scratchy & static sound through the deck's output when I slide it. What is recommended to clean these slider volume controls and the level controls? Would you use CAIG Deoxit D5 or Deoxit Fader F5 or something else or even both? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 11 21:55:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Parts - help In-Reply-To: <201A84DB-621F-4963-9B4D-546B67475110@terra.com.br> References: <201A84DB-621F-4963-9B4D-546B67475110@terra.com.br> Message-ID: <512293902.2868668.1518382538156@mail.yahoo.com> Do you know if any other decks use this same IC? From: Rodrigo via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 8:04 AM Subject: [naktalk] Parts - help Hi everyone, I just bought an RX202 that seemed to be just fine and after a few days of use my tech found out that the controlling eprom was going crazy. I also need a little motor (please see pics below). Does anybody have any suggestions on how to replace the chip or repair the motor?   Nakamichi VA700B04 Motor Vintage Cassette Deck Repair Any help will be more than welcome! Thank you. Rodrigo Krause Sent from my iPhone========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 11 22:37:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ingemar Lindqvist via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 22:37:22 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Parts - help In-Reply-To: <512293902.2868668.1518382538156@mail.yahoo.com> References: <201A84DB-621F-4963-9B4D-546B67475110@terra.com.br> <512293902.2868668.1518382538156@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: "EEPROM was going crazy", what does that mean? Not a very professional judgement from your tech, is it? Ingemar Virusfritt. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> 2018-02-11 21:55 GMT+01:00 Bob Naylor via Naktalk : > Do you know if any other decks use this same IC? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Rodrigo via Naktalk > *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com > *Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2018 8:04 AM > *Subject:* [naktalk] Parts - help > > Hi everyone, > I just bought an RX202 that seemed to be just fine and after a few days of > use my tech found out that the controlling eprom was going crazy. I also > need a little motor (please see pics below). > Does anybody have any suggestions on how to replace the chip or repair the > motor? > > > Nakamichi VA700B04 Motor Vintage Cassette Deck Repair > > Any help will be more than welcome! > Thank you. > > Rodrigo Krause > Sent from my iPhone========---------------------------------------------- > -----------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 00:31:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:31:16 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? Message-ID: <161ab41dd91-c8b-1cb3f@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> I have a bunch of old metal cassettes originally recorded on a Nak 480 about 30 years ago. I later upgraded to a NAK Cassette Deck1 in the 90's. I remember back then the sound quality of 480 recorded tapes played on the Casette Deck1 was not as good. Deep bass in particular was a little distorted and high end was more shrill and less defined than the 480. That was decades ago. I now am retired and looking to digitize my cassette archive. I am looking to replace the Cassette Deck1 (which now has some transport issues) with another used NAK just for tape playback. I am reluctant to try a more expensive NAK deck like the 660 fearing the tapes may also not playback as nicely as on the 480. Does anyone know of any sound quality playback incompatability issues between tapes made on one NAK deck and played back on another? I have my eyes on the 660 because it has pitch control and seems to be a better deck than the Cassette Deck1 but hoping it would be compatible with a 480. Can anyone recommend a specific NAK deck that has great playback sound that I can find used under $500 that would sound as good or better than a 480? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 13:00:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:00:04 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? In-Reply-To: <161ab41dd91-c8b-1cb3f@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> References: <161ab41dd91-c8b-1cb3f@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> Message-ID: <20180219060004.cg17mccb4s8c8g0w@webmail.sasktel.net> I think your biggest factor is going to be if you can get a serviced deck and have it aligned to the tapes that you want to archive.  A BX series deck might be a good choice.   Cheers, Rainer S.    On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:31:16 -0500, via Naktalk wrote: I have a bunch of old metal cassettes originally recorded on a Nak 480 about 30 years ago. I later upgraded to a NAK Cassette Deck1 in the 90's.  I remember back then the sound quality of 480 recorded tapes played on the Casette Deck1 was not as good. Deep bass in particular was a little distorted and high end was more shrill and less defined than the 480. That was decades ago. I now am retired and looking to digitize my cassette archive. I am looking to replace the Cassette Deck1 (which now has some transport issues)  with another used NAK just for tape playback.  I am reluctant to try a more expensive NAK deck like the 660 fearing the tapes may also not playback as nicely as on the 480.   Does anyone know of any sound quality playback incompatability issues between tapes made on one NAK deck and played back on another?  I have my eyes on the 660 because it has pitch control and seems to be a better deck than the Cassette Deck1 but hoping it would be compatible with a 480.  Can anyone recommend a specific NAK deck that has great playback sound that I can find used under $500 that would sound as good or better than a 480?    ------------------------- ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 13:38:49 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Narada Ian via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:38:49 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Re. Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? Message-ID: <6435C22A-F021-402D-B5AD-29C7849BEF05@gn.apc.org> This made me happy to read. My first Nak was a battered 480 which i had Bower & Wilkins service. It revealed wonders on my largely 1st gen Sony luggable recorded tapes from the dawn of tapes. So it was magical on my previous tapes and unbelievable on its own. I have 'upgraded' to 670, 300, Cassette Deck 1, they all make good recordings but none sound as good even after services as the 480. Overengineered and handbuilt with poorly aging components .... my friend was pissed when i sold it to him he wanted the newer kit, but he hadnt had my learning curve. Your right the sound is off on the newer ones...from 300 onwards ...i dont think its all the mechanism, ...I agree with the view that Nak felt the need to get the colder less engaging digital cd sound sorted to compete with cd's. Its a clearer cleaner but different some ambient tonality from the 670 and the 480. However. The issue of maintaining them does make the later models a better long term prospect as real Nak servicing requires such an investment of time if not money in Nak servicing kit... then there is using it as intended and then the orange cap mularky is also in the equation. They do need servicing every few years unfortunately for those of us in the sticks. But whilst other and newer models have lower circuitry noise and better specs than the 480 and i think the 600 series... these had that cassette zing that made people realise Naks were special from way back. Its funny to know that Nak were following to the letter the specs Phillips said was needed to play and record on Cassettes. The whole cassette period was snookered by an indifferrent profit motive. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 13:56:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:56:13 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Sound quality recorded on different Naks Message-ID: Typically for the average user, the original deck will always have the best playback. If you still own the 480, a competent tech could restore it, with a few of your tapes to verify the head alignment still matches, for far less than buying another deck, which in all likelihood will not match the alignment that your old deck had. The alignment is easily the most important aspect of making your ild tapes sound their best. Typically that is azimuth, but azimuth has zero effect on bass, which is more often head height. Also, any deck that is not absolutely competently serviced will add more W&F which will also degrade the process. The exception is a Dragon, of course,(dual direct drive, with auto azimuth correction) but a known good serviced one is more than you would want to spend, and if there is a head height issue,not going to solve that. Of course, if you are getting out of cassettes all together, you could purchase a serviced Dragon, digitize, then resell it, for a total cost far less than $500. If your 480 is no longer viable then an LX-3 is a close match. A 660 is also a good choice, though finding a well Serviced one is a harder chore. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 18:03:51 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? In-Reply-To: <20180219060004.cg17mccb4s8c8g0w@webmail.sasktel.net> References: <161ab41dd91-c8b-1cb3f@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> <20180219060004.cg17mccb4s8c8g0w@webmail.sasktel.net> Message-ID: <523436111.1356049.1519059831278@mail.yahoo.com> Since you have a CD-1 with the front panel azimuth control, how much did that adjustment help?Bob N From: Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk To: cadjal711 at verizon.net; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 4:00 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? #yiv0522786326 p{margin:0;padding:0;}Ithink your biggest factor is going to be if you can get a serviced deck and haveit aligned to the tapes that you want to archive.  A BX series deck might be agood choice. Cheers,Rainer S.    On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:31:16 -0500, viaNaktalk wrote: I havea bunch of old metal cassettes originally recorded on a Nak 480 about 30 yearsago. I later upgraded to a NAK Cassette Deck1 in the 90's.  I remember backthen the sound quality of 480 recorded tapes played on the Casette Deck1 was notas good. Deep bass in particular was a little distorted and high end was moreshrill and less defined than the 480. That was decades ago. I now am retired andlooking to digitize my cassette archive. I am looking to replace the CassetteDeck1 (which now has some transport issues)  with another used NAK just fortape playback.  I am reluctant to try a more expensive NAK deck like the 660fearing the tapes may also not playback as nicely as on the 480.  Does anyone know of any sound quality playback incompatability issuesbetween tapes made on one NAK deck and played back on another?  I have my eyeson the 660 because it has pitch control and seems to be a better deck than theCassette Deck1 but hoping it would be compatible with a 480.  Can anyonerecommend a specific NAK deck that has great playback sound that I can find usedunder $500 that would sound as good or better than a 480?    ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 19:33:44 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Willy Hermann via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:33:44 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] dragon - tape speed adjustment In-Reply-To: <4BA45477.2000105@versanet.de> References: <4BA45477.2000105@versanet.de> Message-ID: That would be extremely unusual if a Dragon speed was off that far. Speed is crystal referenced and the speeds of the two capstan shafts vary depending on direction since, in a dual capstan deck, the leading capstan has to turn just slightly faster than the trailing one. It's also a diffused resonance deck so the capstans are not the same diameter and don't turn and the same speeds. There are some shorting points on the capstan motor board but they're for slight adjustment of speed to keep the tape tight across the heads. VR 501 and 502 are there to balance the waveform sent to the motors. I think Nakamichi says to adjust them for minimum W/F. I usually just probe the power amps and adjust for the best sine wave I can. Willy ​ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 23:02:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:02:16 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? Message-ID: <161b016bc7b-c8b-2a41e@webjas-vaa008.srv.aolmail.net> Azimuth adjustment on the CD-1 was set perfectly. I fold down the signal to mono and adjust azimuth and eliminate skewing. This was not the source of the sound problem. I knew 25 yrs ago when the deck was new that tapes made on my 480 just didn't sound quite as good. I only upgraded after my 480 died and I wanted that adjustable playback head azimuth adjustment feature. Too bad only a handful of Naks have it. It's a very useful feature especially if you did tape trading like I used to -----Original Message----- From: Bob Naylor via Naktalk To: joyell.solie ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Mon, Feb 19, 2018 12:03 pm Subject: Re: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? Since you have a CD-1 with the front panel azimuth control, how much did that adjustment help? Bob N From: Joy-Ell & Rainer via Naktalk To: cadjal711 at verizon.net; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 4:00 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? Ithink your biggest factor is going to be if you can get a serviced deck and haveit aligned to the tapes that you want to archive. A BX series deck might be agood choice. Cheers, Rainer S. On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:31:16 -0500, viaNaktalk wrote: I havea bunch of old metal cassettes originally recorded on a Nak 480 about 30 yearsago. I later upgraded to a NAK Cassette Deck1 in the 90's. I remember backthen the sound quality of 480 recorded tapes played on the Casette Deck1 was notas good. Deep bass in particular was a little distorted and high end was moreshrill and less defined than the 480. That was decades ago. I now am retired andlooking to digitize my cassette archive. I am looking to replace the CassetteDeck1 (which now has some transport issues) with another used NAK just fortape playback. I am reluctant to try a more expensive NAK deck like the 660fearing the tapes may also not playback as nicely as on the 480. Does anyone know of any sound quality playback incompatability issuesbetween tapes made on one NAK deck and played back on another? I have my eyeson the 660 because it has pitch control and seems to be a better deck than theCassette Deck1 but hoping it would be compatible with a 480. Can anyonerecommend a specific NAK deck that has great playback sound that I can find usedunder $500 that would sound as good or better than a 480? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Virus-free. www.avg.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglistMaintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 23:11:31 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:11:31 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Sound quality recorded on different Naks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <161b01f3413-c8b-22ff0@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> FYI, I trashed my 480 years ago. As I posted on another thread, the CD-1 was calibrated fine, no azimuth issues. The 480 tapes sound OK on the CD-1 but it doesn't match the overall tonal clarity of the 480. I have to believe the output stage design was different on the CD-1 vs the 480 from 10 yrs earlier. I just went for a used 660 on ebay. I'll let you know how it sounds, Since it was produced around the same as the 480 I'm trusting that output stage design will be similar. Also like having a pitch control. I did a lot of tape trading back in the day and let's just say 1.75 IPS is not exactly the same on all tape decks :) -----Original Message----- From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk Sent: Mon, Feb 19, 2018 8:02 am Subject: [naktalk] Sound quality recorded on different Naks Typically for the average user, the original deck will always have the best playback. If you still own the 480, a competent tech could restore it, with a few of your tapes to verify the head alignment still matches, for far less than buying another deck, which in all likelihood will not match the alignment that your old deck had. The alignment is easily the most important aspect of making your ild tapes sound their best. Typically that is azimuth, but azimuth has zero effect on bass, which is more often head height. Also, any deck that is not absolutely competently serviced will add more W&F which will also degrade the process. The exception is a Dragon, of course, (dual direct drive, with auto azimuth correction) but a known good serviced one is more than you would want to spend, and if there is a head height issue, not going to solve that. Of course, if you are getting out of cassettes all together, you could purchase a serviced Dragon, digitize, then resell it, for a total cost far less than $500. If your 480 is no longer viable then an LX-3 is a close match. A 660 is also a good choice, though finding a well Serviced one is a harder chore. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglistMaintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Feb 19 23:14:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:14:03 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Re. Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? In-Reply-To: <6435C22A-F021-402D-B5AD-29C7849BEF05@gn.apc.org> References: <6435C22A-F021-402D-B5AD-29C7849BEF05@gn.apc.org> Message-ID: <161b0218743-c82-440a@webjas-vab123.srv.aolmail.net> Interesting feedback. Much appreciated -----Original Message----- From: Narada Ian via Naktalk To: naktalk Sent: Mon, Feb 19, 2018 7:40 am Subject: [naktalk] Re. Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? This made me happy to read. My first Nak was a battered 480 which i had Bower & Wilkins service.It revealed wonders on my largely 1st gen Sony luggable recorded tapes from the dawn of tapes. So it was magical on my previous tapes and unbelievable on its own.I have 'upgraded' to 670, 300, Cassette Deck 1, they all make good recordings but none sound as good even after services as the 480.Overengineered and handbuilt with poorly aging components .... my friend was pissed when i sold it to him he wanted the newer kit, but he hadnt had my learning curve.Your right the sound is off on the newer ones...from 300 onwards ...i dont think its all the mechanism, ...I agree with the view that Nak felt the need to get the colder less engaging digital cd sound sorted to compete with cd's.Its a clearer cleaner but different some ambient tonality from the 670 and the 480.However. The issue of maintaining them does make the later models a better long term prospect as real Nak servicing requires such an investment of time if not money in Nak servicing kit... then there is using it as intended and then the orange cap mularky is also in the equation. They do need servicing every few years unfortunately for those of us in the sticks.But whilst other and newer models have lower circuitry noise and better specs than the 480 and i think the 600 series... these had that cassette zing that made people realise Naks were special from way back.Its funny to know that Nak were following to the letter the specs Phillips said was neededto play and record on Cassettes. The whole cassette period was snookered by an indifferrent profit motive.========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglistMaintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Feb 20 20:53:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Vesselin Uzunov via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? In-Reply-To: <161ab41dd91-c8b-1cb3f@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> References: <161ab41dd91-c8b-1cb3f@webjas-vae189.srv.aolmail.net> Message-ID: <1923833295.2204169.1519156402629@mail.yahoo.com> Hi Nak guy,I am with you about sound of the Nak decks. To  my hears the sweetest sound goes to N6xx,zx,then to N480 and N582.Opposite to you I am recording my CD and  MP3 through external DAC on type I and type II  cassettes,and then I listen them on N670zx in my bed room stereo set .I know it sounds crazy,but this is the one of the way to really enjoy the sound of the music.My question to you is: Do you plan to sell those N480 cassettes,after recording them? I have couple of N6xx decks I might decide to sell. From: via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 2:03 AM Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? I have a bunch of old metal cassettes originally recorded on a Nak 480 about 30 years ago. I later upgraded to a NAK Cassette Deck1 in the 90's.  I remember back then the sound quality of 480 recorded tapes played on the Casette Deck1 was not as good. Deep bass in particular was a little distorted and high end was more shrill and less defined than the 480. That was decades ago. I now am retired and looking to digitize my cassette archive. I am looking to replace the Cassette Deck1 (which now has some transport issues)  with another used NAK just for tape playback.  I am reluctant to try a more expensive NAK deck like the 660 fearing the tapes may also not playback as nicely as on the 480.  Does anyone know of any sound quality playback incompatability issues between tapes made on one NAK deck and played back on another?  I have my eyes on the 660 because it has pitch control and seems to be a better deck than the Cassette Deck1 but hoping it would be compatible with a 480.  Can anyone recommend a specific NAK deck that has great playback sound that I can find used under $500 that would sound as good or better than a 480?  ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Feb 20 23:39:31 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (martin ferreira via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:39:31 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon pinch roller & guides noise Message-ID: my dragon has started to make a noise when playing in both direstions coming from the transport. I first thought it was from the cassette shell itself but when i put in a mirror cassette to take a look, I noticed the tape guides fluttering (vibrating) causing the noise. The right one on forward, the left on reverse. they work fine when plying with no tape inserted. I have cleaned the guides and rollers with no improvement. It's weird because i just got it serviced a few weeks ago by B&W with new belts and rollers any info would be useful Martin Ferreira -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 21 01:07:53 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:07:53 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? In-Reply-To: <1923833295.2204169.1519156402629@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <161b5b018ce-c8d-1171d@webjas-vab110.srv.aolmail.net> As I noted elsewhere I bit the bullet on a 660. Should have it by next week. The seller claims it plays back with no issues. If it meets expectations, I'll digitize the rare stuff I want to archive and continue using the NAK for main tape playback. As far as recording on the NAK however, one other thing I didn't like on the CD-1 was that it would automatically clip and distort on deep bass frequencies such as pits and dips on vinyl. I don't remember the 480 having that issue but it was years ago. Does anyone know if other NAKs have this same issue with recording deep bass transients? If the 660 has issues, I'll be looking for another NAK. I'm a forum newbie, can we make deals to buy and sell used NAK's on this forum? -----Original Message----- From: Vesselin Uzunov To: cadjal711 ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Sent: Tue, Feb 20, 2018 2:53 pm Subject: Re: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? Hi Nak guy, I am with you about sound of the Nak decks. To my hears the sweetest sound goes to N6xx,zx,then to N480 and N582. Opposite to you I am recording my CD and MP3 through external DAC on type I and type II cassettes,and then I listen them on N670zx in my bed room stereo set .I know it sounds crazy,but this is the one of the way to really enjoy the sound of the music. My question to you is: Do you plan to sell those N480 cassettes,after recording them? I have couple of N6xx decks I might decide to sell. From: via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 2:03 AM Subject: [naktalk] Tape playback sound quality issues on different NAK decks? I have a bunch of old metal cassettes originally recorded on a Nak 480 about 30 years ago. I later upgraded to a NAK Cassette Deck1 in the 90's. I remember back then the sound quality of 480 recorded tapes played on the Casette Deck1 was not as good. Deep bass in particular was a little distorted and high end was more shrill and less defined than the 480. That was decades ago. I now am retired and looking to digitize my cassette archive. I am looking to replace the Cassette Deck1 (which now has some transport issues) with another used NAK just for tape playback. I am reluctant to try a more expensive NAK deck like the 660 fearing the tapes may also not playback as nicely as on the 480. Does anyone know of any sound quality playback incompatability issues between tapes made on one NAK deck and played back on another? I have my eyes on the 660 because it has pitch control and seems to be a better deck than the Cassette Deck1 but hoping it would be compatible with a 480. Can anyone recommend a specific NAK deck that has great playback sound that I can find used under $500 that would sound as good or better than a 480? ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 21 17:24:11 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:24:11 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD&DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my ownCD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Feb 21 20:28:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:28:05 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping In-Reply-To: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> References: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <003901d3ab4a$1a52cd00$4ef86700$@twc.com> Thank you, sir! From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of perry via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 11:24 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my own CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope. Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 00:17:02 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Thompson via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:17:02 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping In-Reply-To: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> References: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <5A8DFDEE.9010304@internode.on.net> Perry Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full I get similar distortion. > perry via Naktalk > 22 February 2018 at 2:24 am > Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( > very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting > transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but > when I serviced my own CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well > and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope. Removal of the > mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new > ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Regards David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 07:42:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Thompson via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:42:33 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5A8E6659.2050409@internode.on.net> Perry You are a fount of Nak knowledge! That fixed the distortion problem on my ZX-9 also.I am now enjoying some full-bodied organ music. Thanks for the clue. David > perry > 22 February 2018 at 10:07 am > Yes, it can also be a problem on a ZX-7 or 9, or any Nak with mute. > Different transistors, but still a problem with the mute affecting the > output. Same test is to remove the mute transistors and see if the > issue is solved. There of course will be more background noise when no > tape is playing or during FF/Rew, but during play that is the same > level of base noise. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: David Thompson > To: Perry Esposito, Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: February 21, 2018 at 6:18 PM > Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping > > Perry > > Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full > I get similar distortion. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 16:31:06 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (KJ Bleus Parsons via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:31:06 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Muting & Distortion Issue - Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Bravo to Perry..... Another easy to do solution for a nagging deck problem. Cheers, Bleausy ************ On Feb 22, 2018 5:00 AM, "via Naktalk" wrote: Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to naktalk at lists.naks.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to naktalk-request at lists.naks.com You can reach the person managing the list at naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." Naktalk digest mailing list Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, don't go with digest mode. If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. Today's Topics: 1. CD-1 bass clipping (perry via Naktalk) 2. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (Les Morgan via Naktalk) 3. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (David Thompson via Naktalk) 4. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (David Thompson via Naktalk) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:24:11 -0500 From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c at Perrys-iPhone> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD&DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my ownCD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:28:05 -0500 From: Les Morgan via Naktalk To: "'perry'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <003901d3ab4a$1a52cd00$4ef86700$@twc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thank you, sir! From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of perry via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 11:24 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my own CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope. Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:17:02 +1000 From: David Thompson via Naktalk To: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <5A8DFDEE.9010304 at internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Perry Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full I get similar distortion. > perry via Naktalk > 22 February 2018 at 2:24 am > Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( > very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting > transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but > when I serviced my own CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well > and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope. Removal of the > mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new > ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Regards David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:42:33 +1000 From: David Thompson via Naktalk To: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <5A8E6659.2050409 at internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Perry You are a fount of Nak knowledge! That fixed the distortion problem on my ZX-9 also.I am now enjoying some full-bodied organ music. Thanks for the clue. David > perry > 22 February 2018 at 10:07 am > Yes, it can also be a problem on a ZX-7 or 9, or any Nak with mute. > Different transistors, but still a problem with the mute affecting the > output. Same test is to remove the mute transistors and see if the > issue is solved. There of course will be more background noise when no > tape is playing or during FF/Rew, but during play that is the same > level of base noise. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: David Thompson > To: Perry Esposito, Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: February 21, 2018 at 6:18 PM > Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping > > Perry > > Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full > I get similar distortion. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ------------------------------ End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 **************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 17:16:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Muting & Distortion Issue - Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1673264701.3880885.1519316186638@mail.yahoo.com> Perry, I also have a CD-1 and a CD-1.5. Which transistor part number did you use? As of now I do not have any distortion in either deck. Many years ago (90's) my 1.5 went to Nakamichi in Southern California. It got a new playback head and a motor. Can't remember which motor. Since then that deck has superb sound! I can't guess how many hours it has on it since then but I'll guess around 50 or so. That's the only Nak I have that I bought brand new however it was a display model but still was in mint condx. Bob N From: KJ Bleus Parsons via Naktalk To: naktalk-request at lists.naks.com; naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:36 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] Muting & Distortion Issue - Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 Bravo to Perry..... Another easy to do solution for a nagging deck problem. Cheers, Bleausy ************ On Feb 22, 2018 5:00 AM, "via Naktalk" wrote: Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to         naktalk at lists.naks.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit         http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ listinfo/naktalk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to         naktalk-request at lists.naks.com You can reach the person managing the list at         naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." Naktalk digest mailing list Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, don't go with digest mode. If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. Today's Topics:    1. CD-1 bass clipping (perry via Naktalk)    2. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (Les Morgan via Naktalk)    3. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (David Thompson via Naktalk)    4. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (David Thompson via Naktalk) ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:24:11 -0500 From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338- 8535f630cb6c at Perrys-iPhone> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD&DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my ownCD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:28:05 -0500 From: Les Morgan via Naktalk To: "'perry'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette         Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <003901d3ab4a$1a52cd00$ 4ef86700$@twc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thank you, sir! From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists. naks.com] On Behalf Of perry via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 11:24 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my own  CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.  Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:17:02 +1000 From: David Thompson via Naktalk To: perry ,  Talk about Nakamichi Cassette         Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <5A8DFDEE.9010304 at internode. on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Perry Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full I get similar distortion. > perry via Naktalk > 22 February 2018 at 2:24 am > Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( > very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting > transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but > when I serviced my own  CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well > and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.  Removal of the > mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new > ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > ========---------------------- ------------------------------ -----========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------- ------------------------------ -----========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------- ------------------------------ -----========= Regards David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:42:33 +1000 From: David Thompson via Naktalk To: perry ,  Talk about Nakamichi Cassette         Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID: <5A8E6659.2050409 at internode. on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Perry You are a fount of Nak knowledge! That fixed the distortion problem on my ZX-9 also.I am now enjoying some full-bodied organ music. Thanks for the clue. David > perry > 22 February 2018 at 10:07 am > Yes, it can also be a problem on a ZX-7 or 9, or any Nak with mute. > Different transistors, but still a problem with the mute affecting the > output. Same test is to remove the mute transistors and see if the > issue is solved. There of course will be more background noise when no > tape is playing or during FF/Rew, but during play that is the same > level of base noise. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: David Thompson > To:  Perry  Esposito, Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Sent: February 21, 2018 at 6:18 PM > Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping > > Perry > > Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full > I get similar distortion. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer ========---------------------- ------------------------------ -----=========           Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register ========---------------------- ------------------------------ -----=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------- ------------------------------ -----========= ------------------------------ End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 ****************************** ********** ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 17:11:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:11:45 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 Message-ID: <73f08588-54fb-4149-a309-25522fb35b90@Perrys-iPhone> I brought to work to see if the fisherman guys might want it. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ------ Original Message ------ From: via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: February 22, 2018 at 6:00 AM Subject: Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 Send Naktalk mailing list submissions to naktalk at lists.naks.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to naktalk-request at lists.naks.com You can reach the person managing the list at naktalk-owner at lists.naks.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Naktalk digest..." Naktalk digest mailing list Please be careful when replying to this digest mail. A good suggestion is to only subscribe in digest mode if you only want to want to get the latest news but don't want to participate in discussion. Otherwise, don't go with digest mode. If you decide to reply anyway, reply to the message itself, so remove the digested email from the reply message and copy the subject to the reply message... you really need to know what you are doing. Digest messages that are replied to without taking any of these precautions may get discarded. Today's Topics: 1. CD-1 bass clipping (perry via Naktalk) 2. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (Les Morgan via Naktalk) 3. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (David Thompson via Naktalk) 4. Re: CD-1 bass clipping (David Thompson via Naktalk) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:24:11 -0500 From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID:<06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c at Perrys-iPhone>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD&DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my ownCD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:28:05 -0500 From: Les Morgan via Naktalk To: "'perry'" , "'Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks'" Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID:<003901d3ab4a$1a52cd00$4ef86700$@twc.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thank you, sir! From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of perry via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 11:24 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD&DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my own CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope. Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:17:02 +1000 From: David Thompson via Naktalk To: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID:<5A8DFDEE.9010304 at internode.on.net>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Perry Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full I get similar distortion.>perry via Naktalk>22 February 2018 at 2:24 am>Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks (>very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting>transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD&DR decks in for service, but>when I serviced my own CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well>and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope. Removal of the>mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new>ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try.>>Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App>========---------------------------------------------------------=========>Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com>========---------------------------------------------------------=========>Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist>Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk>========---------------------------------------------------------========= Regards David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:42:33 +1000 From: David Thompson via Naktalk To: perry , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping Message-ID:<5A8E6659.2050409 at internode.on.net>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Perry You are a fount of Nak knowledge! That fixed the distortion problem on my ZX-9 also.I am now enjoying some full-bodied organ music. Thanks for the clue. David>perry>22 February 2018 at 10:07 am>Yes, it can also be a problem on a ZX-7 or 9, or any Nak with mute.>Different transistors, but still a problem with the mute affecting the>output. Same test is to remove the mute transistors and see if the>issue is solved. There of course will be more background noise when no>tape is playing or during FF/Rew, but during play that is the same>level of base noise.>>Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App>>>>------ Original Message ------>>From: David Thompson>To: Perry Esposito, Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks>Sent: February 21, 2018 at 6:18 PM>Subject: Re: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping>>Perry>>Could this be a problem on a ZX-9 also? With the output volume on full>I get similar distortion.>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Register your Nak today! http://www.naks.com/register ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ------------------------------ End of Naktalk Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 **************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 17:20:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Narada Ian via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:20:13 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner Message-ID: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> Hello Nakkers I have just popped this Nak in... as far as I know its a first service ... i have owned it 15 years or so but i always hoped to get the MX version... Anyway a long time ago Fred Marrs sent me some belts for it and other Naks with the hope i would speak about my experience with his newly manufactured highly specified Nak belts. So Im putting it out there that i have a belt or two from Fred back in the belt wars some 20 years back! here on the forum Its taken some time for the need to come up. As the machine only plays a tape for some 5 minutes and isnt good at rewinding now Im hoping belts will do it... my engineer fitting for me isnt a Nak specialist but is time served and experienced so if there are any pointers i can send him do let me know as he may find it helpful Best wishes from Scotland ian 670zx Cassette Deck 1 BX300 From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 17:24:50 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:24:50 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] CD-1 bass clipping In-Reply-To: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> References: <06ab5939-d0e9-424d-b338-8535f630cb6c@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <20180222102450.7fm1xo3w0skc488k@webmail.sasktel.net> On the TD-700s I remove the muting transistors entirely.  I am wondering if there is much purpose for them in the home decks and what would happen if they where left out ?   Cheers, Rainer S.  (80stech) On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:24:11 -0500, perry via Naktalk wrote: Actually, this is not an uncommon defect with the CD and DR decks ( very occasionally on CR decks) and is usually caused by failing muting transistors. I don’t get a lot of CD & DR decks in for service, but when I serviced my own  CD-1 I noticed some bass distortion as well and it was obvious clipping when viewed on my scope.  Removal of the mute transistors eliminated the clipping and when I installed new ones, the sound remained excellent. An easy fix to try. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ------------------------- ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 17:30:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:30:16 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner In-Reply-To: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> References: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> Message-ID: <20180222103016.hidq3zmfr44o0ckw@webmail.sasktel.net> Hi ian ;)  that sure sounds like an idler tire problem.   Cheers, Rainer On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:20:13 +0000, Narada Ian via Naktalk wrote: Hello Nakkers I have just popped this Nak in... as far as I know its a first service .. i have owned it 15 years or so but i always hoped to get the MX version... Anyway a long time ago Fred Marrs sent me some belts for it and other Naks with the hope i would speak about my experience with his newly manufactured highly specified Nak belts. So Im putting it out there that i have a belt or two from Fred back in the belt wars some 20 years back! here on the forum Its taken some time for the need to come up. As the machine only plays a tape for some 5 minutes and isnt good at rewinding now Im hoping belts will do it... my engineer fitting for me isnt a Nak specialist but is time served and experienced so if there are any pointers i can send him do let me know as he may find it helpful Best wishes from Scotland ian 670zx Cassette Deck 1 BX300 ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Feb 22 17:55:06 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:55:06 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner In-Reply-To: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> References: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> Message-ID: You may need to clean or replace the idler roller. This link may help. http://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Narada Ian via Naktalk wrote: > Hello Nakkers > I have just popped this Nak in... as far as I know its a first service ... i have owned it 15 years or so but i always hoped to get the MX version... > > Anyway a long time ago Fred Marrs sent me some belts for it and other Naks with the hope i would speak about my experience with his newly manufactured highly specified Nak belts. > > So Im putting it out there that i have a belt or two from Fred back in the belt wars some 20 years back! here on the forum > > Its taken some time for the need to come up. > > As the machine only plays a tape for some 5 minutes and isnt good at rewinding now Im hoping belts will do it... my engineer fitting for me isnt a Nak specialist but is time served and experienced so if there are any pointers i can send him do let me know as he may find it helpful > > Best wishes from Scotland > ian > > 670zx > Cassette Deck 1 > BX300 > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Feb 23 13:16:08 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:16:08 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Ignore last message from me Message-ID: <08dab988-f302-48fd-8ac0-aada02eea883@Perrys-iPhone> Please ignore yesterday’s message!It was a bizarre iphone error (that has occurred before, btw). It was meant as a text to my wife, but somehow I either fat fingered it, or some iphone error occurred , as it somehow turned in to an insane cut and paste to the last email address I used, which was Naktalk. Apologies. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Feb 23 18:49:49 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:49:49 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner In-Reply-To: References: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> Message-ID: <009f01d3acce$b4e1be50$1ea53af0$@twc.com> For what it is worth, I have a BX-100 that I just got a belt kit from Marr. The secret on mine, to getting good fast-forward and rewind was to replace the "tire" on the idler that drives the FF and REW mechanisms. I now have a fine machine and am enjoying it very much! Marr is NOT CHEAP, but they are worth their price, in my never-to-be-humble opinion. Les -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Francis Flynn via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:55 AM To: Narada Ian; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner You may need to clean or replace the idler roller. This link may help. http://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Narada Ian via Naktalk wrote: > Hello Nakkers > I have just popped this Nak in... as far as I know its a first service ... i have owned it 15 years or so but i always hoped to get the MX version... > > Anyway a long time ago Fred Marrs sent me some belts for it and other Naks with the hope i would speak about my experience with his newly manufactured highly specified Nak belts. > > So Im putting it out there that i have a belt or two from Fred back in > the belt wars some 20 years back! here on the forum > > Its taken some time for the need to come up. > > As the machine only plays a tape for some 5 minutes and isnt good at > rewinding now Im hoping belts will do it... my engineer fitting for me > isnt a Nak specialist but is time served and experienced so if there > are any pointers i can send him do let me know as he may find it > helpful > > Best wishes from Scotland > ian > > 670zx > Cassette Deck 1 > BX300 > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain > your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------===== > ==== ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Feb 23 18:53:29 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:53:29 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner In-Reply-To: References: <27389CD0-5495-44DE-A097-8042191095FE@gn.apc.org> Message-ID: <00a101d3accf$3820ae70$a8620b50$@twc.com> Reply #2: I reviewed the information at the link and it is SPOT ON! Put a piece of tape over the small, plastic retainer before you remove it to lift away the idler. Be VERY careful; it's fragile, but adequate to do its job. A dental tool is great for lifting off the old tire. Clean the wheel, then install new tire. Clean the brass driver, too! Reinstall carefully. You'll be up and running in a half-day if you have medium mechanical skills AND PATIENCE. If you lack patience, the job gets wayyyy harder..... Les -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Francis Flynn via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:55 AM To: Narada Ian; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] BX 300 unhappy tensioner You may need to clean or replace the idler roller. This link may help. http://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Narada Ian via Naktalk wrote: > Hello Nakkers > I have just popped this Nak in... as far as I know its a first service ... i have owned it 15 years or so but i always hoped to get the MX version... > > Anyway a long time ago Fred Marrs sent me some belts for it and other Naks with the hope i would speak about my experience with his newly manufactured highly specified Nak belts. > > So Im putting it out there that i have a belt or two from Fred back in > the belt wars some 20 years back! here on the forum > > Its taken some time for the need to come up. > > As the machine only plays a tape for some 5 minutes and isnt good at > rewinding now Im hoping belts will do it... my engineer fitting for me > isnt a Nak specialist but is time served and experienced so if there > are any pointers i can send him do let me know as he may find it > helpful > > Best wishes from Scotland > ian > > 670zx > Cassette Deck 1 > BX300 > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain > your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------===== > ==== ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 24 01:15:39 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:15:39 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Ignore last message from me In-Reply-To: <08dab988-f302-48fd-8ac0-aada02eea883@Perrys-iPhone> References: <08dab988-f302-48fd-8ac0-aada02eea883@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <003901d3ad04$9b74e4c0$d25eae40$@twc.com> All is forgiven! Go, my son, and sin no more….(ducking lightning bolt) Les From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of perry via Naktalk Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 7:16 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Ignore last message from me Please ignore yesterday’s message! It was a bizarre iphone error (that has occurred before, btw). It was meant as a text to my wife, but somehow I either fat fingered it, or some iphone error occurred , as it somehow turned in to an insane cut and paste to the last email address I used, which was Naktalk. Apologies. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 24 17:43:29 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Narada Ian via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 16:43:29 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] re BX300 unhappy tensioner Message-ID: <19640143-86AF-440C-B3BF-63BA1185D422@gn.apc.org> Dear colleagues yes the idler wheel problem it is but the belts have been replaced too i look forward to its return from the engineer i also lodged a Denon AV receiver which had been to the Agents and said to be unrepairable It is full of microchips abd very modern circuitry and he was not optimistic about fixing it. i knew enough to say some sort of solenoid had stopped responding to power on button and later the remote. lo and behold RS components did a solenoid which he has rigged in job done... i dont do 5.1 but like the dvds to go to the Tannoys I was very pleased at his sucessful bodgery seeing Denon didnt supply that part even to themselves ho la nice to be in touch and thank you for the idler tips... confirming the inevitable cheers from scotland ian From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Feb 24 20:57:40 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (R.G. via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:57:40 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Message-ID: <64AB016005B548CAB906D8AF7BC4653F@PiceRichard> Hi all I am looking for instruction on how to replace belts and idler tire on a RX-505. With pics or video it would be great. Thanks in advance for all information.... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 25 00:14:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Roland via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 18:14:18 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Ignore last message from me In-Reply-To: <08dab988-f302-48fd-8ac0-aada02eea883@Perrys-iPhone> References: <08dab988-f302-48fd-8ac0-aada02eea883@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <38d69675-2fae-6fa4-dc8c-a32e3bf8cfcb@verizon.net> Well, I don't know about others but my interest in whether the fishermen like it has piqued. On 2/23/2018 7:16 AM, perry via Naktalk wrote: > > Please ignore yesterday’s message!  It was a bizarre iphone error > (that has occurred before, btw). It was meant as a text to my wife, > but somehow I either fat fingered it, or some iphone error occurred , > as it somehow turned in to an insane cut and paste to the last email > address I used, which was Naktalk. Apologies. > > Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -- Roland -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 25 01:45:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?b?Sm95LUVsbCAmIFJhaW5lcg==?= via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 18:45:45 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] Ignore last message from me In-Reply-To: <38d69675-2fae-6fa4-dc8c-a32e3bf8cfcb@verizon.net> References: <08dab988-f302-48fd-8ac0-aada02eea883@Perrys-iPhone> <38d69675-2fae-6fa4-dc8c-a32e3bf8cfcb@verizon.net> Message-ID: <20180224184545.0tijsgy02s4ogkgg@webmail.sasktel.net> If the wife doesn't want it you can usually count on the fishermen guys!   :)     Cheers, Rainer On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 18:14:18 -0500, Roland via Naktalk wrote: Well, I don't know about others but my interest in whether the fishermen like it has piqued. On 2/23/2018 7:16 AM, perry via Naktalk wrote: Please ignore yesterday’s message!  It was a bizarre iphone error (that has occurred before, btw). It was meant as a text to my wife, but somehow I either fat fingered it, or some iphone error occurred , as it somehow turned in to an insane cut and paste to the last email address I used, which was Naktalk. Apologies. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -- Roland ------------------------- ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Feb 25 13:14:25 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:14:25 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505/303 belt/tire link Message-ID: If you send me your email address to perry.nak at comcast.net I can get you linked to a Dropbox folder with pics and instructions Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-3.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Mar 7 05:09:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Pescovitz via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:09:38 -0800 Subject: [naktalk] suggestion for Nakamichi RX-505 repair? Message-ID: <21ED46E3-2D10-41DE-9E0C-2C0BD8107B66@pesco.net> Hi there, I’m the very happy new owner of a Nakamichi RX-505 that’s in excellent working condition. It does have one issue that’s slightly annoying: On the CAT Bottom Assembly, one of the two tabs that holds the CAT Window in place snapped off at some point before I acquired the deck. (Fortunately, I have the CAT Window.) The window mostly stays in place clipped by just one tab but it does wiggle and is easily knocked out of place when inserting a cassette. Anyone happen to have a spare CAT Bottom Assembly? Or a good suggested fix for the snapped tab to secure the CAT Window? (Was thinking a dot of a non-permanent adhesive.) Thanks so much! -dp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: screenshot.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 57888 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Mar 12 09:31:57 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (zakynthos via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:31:57 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi CR-7E/A Cassette Door required! Message-ID: <125D97411A384946A517EB6CB9976C8B@W10PC0001> Hi, anyone out there, who has a Cassette Door for sale? Mine was broken during shipping.... Kind Regards Sven -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Mar 21 17:31:14 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:31:14 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Message-ID: Replaced capstan belt. Must have fouled something up. Cams consistently cycle round twice at power up, pause about three seconds, then continue cycling with occasional pauses for less than a second. Is control logic cleverly trying to sync logic and cams up as they should be? Rewind, Play, FastForward, Pause, and Fader up keypad LEDs are lit once cams pause the first time. Is that a useful error code? Before powering deck up, twice carefully positioned cams like those of another working unit at power down, thinking there may be required sync between control logic and cams at power up - no help. Put old belt on again, going back to what worked last. No help. No such problem when main "Logic" PCB swapped into another working unit, so I trust I didn't do something to that card, and problem is something to do with transport assembly or its connecting cables. Display says "Ready". Capstans never turn, but I see 12V capstan supply voltages on the motor PCB. Was very careful with motor PCB when belt replaced and cams repositioned manually, seeing those fine coil supply wires and avoiding ESD, but gotta wonder. I sparingly oiled capstan shafts. Just mentioning it, despite not seeing how that would matter at this time. Hoping someone has some insight on where to go next, including but not limited to looking at supply voltages and signals with DVM and/or oscilloscope. Thanks for anything you might suggest! -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 22 14:35:10 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2078419284.5245875.1521725710900@mail.yahoo.com> Never saw these symptoms, but here are some random thoughts: 1. I would carefully and thoroughly check control motor and leaf switches wiring. Look    for broken wires. 2. Same for connections to the capstan motor PCB. 3. I would not suspect the belt. (You clearly have an electrical -- not mechanical -- issue) 4. There is no need to preposition cams. A working unit will reset everything during the     first power-up. 5. Not related to the problem(s), but if you lubricated the capstans, make sure the capstan     contact areas are squeaky clean before putting in a cassette. Same for the fly wheels     contact surfaces and the belt Good luck, -- Ron From: Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk To: "naktalk at lists.naks.com" Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:33 PM Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Replaced capstan belt.  Must have fouled something up. Cams consistently cycle round twice at power up, pause about three seconds, then continue cycling with occasional pauses for less than a second.  Is control logic cleverly trying to sync logic and cams up as they should be? Rewind, Play, FastForward, Pause, and Fader up keypad LEDs are lit once cams pause the first time.  Is that a useful error code? Before powering deck up, twice carefully positioned cams like those of another working unit at power down, thinking there may be required sync between control logic and cams at power up - no help. Put old belt on again, going back to what worked last.  No help. No such problem when main "Logic" PCB swapped into another working unit, so I trust I didn't do something to that card, and problem is something to do with transport assembly or its connecting cables. Display says "Ready". Capstans never turn, but I see 12V capstan supply voltages on the motor PCB.  Was very careful with motor PCB when belt replaced and cams repositioned manually, seeing those fine coil supply wires and avoiding ESD, but gotta wonder. I sparingly oiled capstan shafts.  Just mentioning it, despite not seeing how that would matter at this time. Hoping someone has some insight on where to go next, including but not limited to looking at supply voltages and signals with DVM and/or oscilloscope. Thanks for anything you might suggest! -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 22 14:35:10 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2078419284.5245875.1521725710900@mail.yahoo.com> Never saw these symptoms, but here are some random thoughts: 1. I would carefully and thoroughly check control motor and leaf switches wiring. Look    for broken wires. 2. Same for connections to the capstan motor PCB. 3. I would not suspect the belt. (You clearly have an electrical -- not mechanical -- issue) 4. There is no need to preposition cams. A working unit will reset everything during the     first power-up. 5. Not related to the problem(s), but if you lubricated the capstans, make sure the capstan     contact areas are squeaky clean before putting in a cassette. Same for the fly wheels     contact surfaces and the belt Good luck, -- Ron From: Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk To: "naktalk at lists.naks.com" Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:33 PM Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Replaced capstan belt.  Must have fouled something up. Cams consistently cycle round twice at power up, pause about three seconds, then continue cycling with occasional pauses for less than a second.  Is control logic cleverly trying to sync logic and cams up as they should be? Rewind, Play, FastForward, Pause, and Fader up keypad LEDs are lit once cams pause the first time.  Is that a useful error code? Before powering deck up, twice carefully positioned cams like those of another working unit at power down, thinking there may be required sync between control logic and cams at power up - no help. Put old belt on again, going back to what worked last.  No help. No such problem when main "Logic" PCB swapped into another working unit, so I trust I didn't do something to that card, and problem is something to do with transport assembly or its connecting cables. Display says "Ready". Capstans never turn, but I see 12V capstan supply voltages on the motor PCB.  Was very careful with motor PCB when belt replaced and cams repositioned manually, seeing those fine coil supply wires and avoiding ESD, but gotta wonder. I sparingly oiled capstan shafts.  Just mentioning it, despite not seeing how that would matter at this time. Hoping someone has some insight on where to go next, including but not limited to looking at supply voltages and signals with DVM and/or oscilloscope. Thanks for anything you might suggest! -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 22 15:45:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (N.van.wijnen@ziggo.nl via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:45:38 +0100 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling In-Reply-To: <2078419284.5245875.1521725710900@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2078419284.5245875.1521725710900@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi, Also clean the leaf switches. They are become black and make no contact. Best regards Norman > Op 22 mrt. 2018 om 14:35 heeft Ron via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > > Never saw these symptoms, but here are some random thoughts: > > 1. I would carefully and thoroughly check control motor and leaf switches wiring. Look > for broken wires. > > 2. Same for connections to the capstan motor PCB. > > 3. I would not suspect the belt. (You clearly have an electrical -- not mechanical -- issue) > > 4. There is no need to preposition cams. A working unit will reset everything during the > first power-up. > > 5. Not related to the problem(s), but if you lubricated the capstans, make sure the capstan > contact areas are squeaky clean before putting in a cassette. Same for the fly wheels > contact surfaces and the belt > > Good luck, > > -- Ron > > > From: Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk > To: "naktalk at lists.naks.com" > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:33 PM > Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling > > Replaced capstan belt. Must have fouled something up. > > Cams consistently cycle round twice at power up, pause about three seconds, then continue cycling with occasional pauses for less than a second. Is control logic cleverly trying to sync logic and cams up as they should be? > > Rewind, Play, FastForward, Pause, and Fader up keypad LEDs are lit once cams pause the first time. Is that a useful error code? > > Before powering deck up, twice carefully positioned cams like those of another working unit at power down, thinking there may be required sync between control logic and cams at power up - no help. > > Put old belt on again, going back to what worked last. No help. > > No such problem when main "Logic" PCB swapped into another working unit, so I trust I didn't do something to that card, and problem is something to do with transport assembly or its connecting cables. > > Display says "Ready". > > Capstans never turn, but I see 12V capstan supply voltages on the motor PCB. > > Was very careful with motor PCB when belt replaced and cams repositioned manually, seeing those fine coil supply wires and avoiding ESD, but gotta wonder. > > I sparingly oiled capstan shafts. Just mentioning it, despite not seeing how that would matter at this time. > > Hoping someone has some insight on where to go next, including but not limited to looking at supply voltages and signals with DVM and/or oscilloscope. > > Thanks for anything you might suggest! > > -Karl > > > Karl Fitzke > Audio/Visual Specialist > 214 Olin Library > Ithaca, NY 14853 > > 607-255-5521 > karl.fitzke at cornell.edu > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 22 19:20:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Victor Gabrenas via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:20:13 -0600 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling In-Reply-To: References: <2078419284.5245875.1521725710900@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <010a01d3c20a$6b933f70$42b9be50$@math.utah.edu> I have seen similar issues and It was cause from misconnected cables to the logic board. I would double check your cables that attach to logic board and make sure they are in there proper connectors. Vic From: Naktalk On Behalf Of N.van.wijnen at ziggo.nl via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 8:46 AM To: Ron ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Hi, Also clean the leaf switches. They are become black and make no contact. Best regards Norman Op 22 mrt. 2018 om 14:35 heeft Ron via Naktalk > het volgende geschreven: Never saw these symptoms, but here are some random thoughts: 1. I would carefully and thoroughly check control motor and leaf switches wiring. Look for broken wires. 2. Same for connections to the capstan motor PCB. 3. I would not suspect the belt. (You clearly have an electrical -- not mechanical -- issue) 4. There is no need to preposition cams. A working unit will reset everything during the first power-up. 5. Not related to the problem(s), but if you lubricated the capstans, make sure the capstan contact areas are squeaky clean before putting in a cassette. Same for the fly wheels contact surfaces and the belt Good luck, -- Ron _____ From: Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk > To: "naktalk at lists.naks.com " > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:33 PM Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Replaced capstan belt. Must have fouled something up. Cams consistently cycle round twice at power up, pause about three seconds, then continue cycling with occasional pauses for less than a second. Is control logic cleverly trying to sync logic and cams up as they should be? Rewind, Play, FastForward, Pause, and Fader up keypad LEDs are lit once cams pause the first time. Is that a useful error code? Before powering deck up, twice carefully positioned cams like those of another working unit at power down, thinking there may be required sync between control logic and cams at power up - no help. Put old belt on again, going back to what worked last. No help. No such problem when main "Logic" PCB swapped into another working unit, so I trust I didn't do something to that card, and problem is something to do with transport assembly or its connecting cables. Display says "Ready". Capstans never turn, but I see 12V capstan supply voltages on the motor PCB. Was very careful with motor PCB when belt replaced and cams repositioned manually, seeing those fine coil supply wires and avoiding ESD, but gotta wonder. I sparingly oiled capstan shafts. Just mentioning it, despite not seeing how that would matter at this time. Hoping someone has some insight on where to go next, including but not limited to looking at supply voltages and signals with DVM and/or oscilloscope. Thanks for anything you might suggest! -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Mar 27 21:37:50 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:37:50 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Message-ID: Thanks to everyone who responded to my earlier email. You confirmed my earlier suspicions and earlier today I finally got a chance to look at that deck again. Looking much closer, I found that a few leads had indeed broken off of the capstan motor board. That is very easy to happen when they get flexed as you remove the transport assembly, especially considering they don't solder to a through-hole. Moral of the story: It a good very good idea to hold that bundle of wires down against the board while removing and replacing the transport so they don't flex where they've been stripped and connected to the board. Its all put back to together right and working great now. -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Mar 27 22:01:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 20:01:26 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Actually, there is a hole on the board that I just put a cable-tie through and wrapped around that bundle. This deck was missing that when I started, but I have very little doubt about what that hole is for at this point. ________________________________ From: Karl E. Fitzke Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:37 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Thanks to everyone who responded to my earlier email. You confirmed my earlier suspicions and earlier today I finally got a chance to look at that deck again. Looking much closer, I found that a few leads had indeed broken off of the capstan motor board. That is very easy to happen when they get flexed as you remove the transport assembly, especially considering they don't solder to a through-hole. Moral of the story: It a good very good idea to hold that bundle of wires down against the board while removing and replacing the transport so they don't flex where they've been stripped and connected to the board. Its all put back to together right and working great now. -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Mar 28 08:50:13 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:50:13 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <009601d3c661$07429dd0$15c7d970$@twc.com> GREAT news! I was not a responder, but I'm a "fixer" so I'm glad you slew the dragon (no pun intended..I think NAK made a "dragon".) Les From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:38 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A not powering up correctly following belt replacement - Cams Cycling Thanks to everyone who responded to my earlier email. You confirmed my earlier suspicions and earlier today I finally got a chance to look at that deck again. Looking much closer, I found that a few leads had indeed broken off of the capstan motor board. That is very easy to happen when they get flexed as you remove the transport assembly, especially considering they don't solder to a through-hole. Moral of the story: It a good very good idea to hold that bundle of wires down against the board while removing and replacing the transport so they don't flex where they've been stripped and connected to the board. Its all put back to together right and working great now. -Karl Karl Fitzke Audio/Visual Specialist 214 Olin Library Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-5521 karl.fitzke at cornell.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Mar 28 22:16:58 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:16:58 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7 not powering up Message-ID: <1d756641-10b4-485b-90fa-3fdacd757374@Perrys-iPhone> You are welcome. We’ve seen that, done that. Another tip:if you ever work on that CR-7/5/4 drive again is to put 2 inch wide blue painters tape over the whole exposed motor winding area of the DD. It is just too easy to damage the fine wires and exposed Hall sensors when working on it. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 29 11:12:55 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:12:55 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Mouser Nichicon E-caps in the UKL series Message-ID: Dear Naktalkers, I have recently tried to order the following caps to Mouser France but was not able to do so as I had to order at least 200 pieces if not 2200! Here is the list of these caps, all in the UKL series (low leakage current with which I replace the LN caps): 1 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1H010MDDANA 0.58 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR68KDDANA 0.47 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR47KDDANA 0.33 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR33KDDANA 0.22 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR22KDDANA Is it also true for you guys in the US ? If yes, which caps do you use instead tu replace these LN caps in our Naks? Thanks again for your help Bernard From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 29 15:31:19 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (N.van.wijnen@ziggo.nl via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:31:19 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Mouser Nichicon E-caps in the UKL series In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51D6D42B-1427-4029-93CF-B98A59A67E39@ziggo.nl> Hi Bernard, Ln caps replacement i use elna silmicII Best regards Norman Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 29 mrt. 2018 om 11:12 heeft bb via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > Dear Naktalkers, > > > I have recently tried to order the following caps to Mouser France but was not able to do so as I had to order at least 200 pieces if not 2200! > > Here is the list of these caps, all in the UKL series (low leakage current with which I replace the LN caps): > > 1 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1H010MDDANA > > 0.58 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR68KDDANA > > 0.47 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR47KDDANA > > 0.33 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR33KDDANA > > 0.22 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR22KDDANA > > > Is it also true for you guys in the US ? > > If yes, which caps do you use instead tu replace these LN caps in our Naks? > > > Thanks again for your help > > Bernard > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Mar 29 15:34:19 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Norman van wijnen via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:34:19 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Mouser Nichicon E-caps in the UKL series In-Reply-To: <51D6D42B-1427-4029-93CF-B98A59A67E39@ziggo.nl> References: <51D6D42B-1427-4029-93CF-B98A59A67E39@ziggo.nl> Message-ID: Or pure gold versions of nichicon Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 29 mrt. 2018 om 15:31 heeft N.van.wijnen at ziggo.nl via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Bernard, > Ln caps replacement i use elna silmicII > Best regards > Norman > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > >> Op 29 mrt. 2018 om 11:12 heeft bb via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: >> >> Dear Naktalkers, >> >> >> I have recently tried to order the following caps to Mouser France but was not able to do so as I had to order at least 200 pieces if not 2200! >> >> Here is the list of these caps, all in the UKL series (low leakage current with which I replace the LN caps): >> >> 1 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1H010MDDANA >> >> 0.58 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR68KDDANA >> >> 0.47 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR47KDDANA >> >> 0.33 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR33KDDANA >> >> 0.22 uF 50 V : 647-UKL1HR22KDDANA >> >> >> Is it also true for you guys in the US ? >> >> If yes, which caps do you use instead tu replace these LN caps in our Naks? >> >> >> Thanks again for your help >> >> Bernard >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-4.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Apr 2 17:19:30 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Cap via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:19:30 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck Message-ID: Hey all. Doing my yearly service of my lx-5 and was getting low output levels. Couldn't figure out what it was so I replaced the op amps and caps for the rec/playback/headphone circuits and troubleshot a bit more. Same issue. Noticed that the fader controls now don't do anything, meaning that both lights are always on and the fader buttons do nothing. Checked the buttons themselves and they do work, but I'm guessing the 4556/ic501 is bad somehow or the fader circuit is stuck? Any ideas? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Apr 2 23:25:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:25:15 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <004001d3cac9$190b8920$4b229b60$@twc.com> How about cleaning the fader with some Deoxit? Les Morgan From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Fran Cap via Naktalk Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 11:20 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck Hey all. Doing my yearly service of my lx-5 and was getting low output levels. Couldn't figure out what it was so I replaced the op amps and caps for the rec/playback/headphone circuits and troubleshot a bit more. Same issue. Noticed that the fader controls now don't do anything, meaning that both lights are always on and the fader buttons do nothing. Checked the buttons themselves and they do work, but I'm guessing the 4556/ic501 is bad somehow or the fader circuit is stuck? Any ideas? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Apr 3 19:01:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Cap via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:01:15 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck In-Reply-To: <004001d3cac9$190b8920$4b229b60$@twc.com> References: <004001d3cac9$190b8920$4b229b60$@twc.com> Message-ID: Just cleaned out the switches, connectors, and tinned everything up. Checked all the switches/connectors with the multimeter. Good news: The fader now goes through the correct startup procedure and stays in the fade up mode Bad news: It stays in the fade up mode and pressing the fade down lights up the fade down, but it snaps back up. Since it isn't the switches so that narrows it to either a bad trace or a bad component. I'm not sure exactly how the fader works so any tips would be appreciated. On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Les Morgan wrote: > How about cleaning the fader with some Deoxit? > > > > Les Morgan > > > > *From:* Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] *On Behalf Of *Fran > Cap via Naktalk > *Sent:* Monday, April 02, 2018 11:20 AM > *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com > *Subject:* [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck > > > > Hey all. > > Doing my yearly service of my lx-5 and was getting low output levels. > Couldn't figure out what it was so I replaced the op amps and caps for the > rec/playback/headphone circuits and troubleshot a bit more. Same issue. > Noticed that the fader controls now don't do anything, meaning that both > lights are always on and the fader buttons do nothing. Checked the buttons > themselves and they do work, but I'm guessing the 4556/ic501 is bad somehow > or the fader circuit is stuck? > > Any ideas? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Apr 3 20:46:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Cap via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:46:38 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck In-Reply-To: References: <004001d3cac9$190b8920$4b229b60$@twc.com> Message-ID: Ok I figured it out. Looked at the circuit for the fader and it uses a high current output op amp (4556) with a 1/2 w zenner. I took out the opamp and checked it's short circuit current and one side was giving a round 1/3 of the rated current for the chip. I subbed it in with one from my parts box. Works fine now. 😂 On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 1:01 PM Fran Cap wrote: > Just cleaned out the switches, connectors, and tinned everything up. > Checked all the switches/connectors with the multimeter. > Good news: The fader now goes through the correct startup procedure and > stays in the fade up mode > Bad news: It stays in the fade up mode and pressing the fade down lights > up the fade down, but it snaps back up. > > Since it isn't the switches so that narrows it to either a bad trace or a > bad component. I'm not sure exactly how the fader works so any tips would > be appreciated. > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Les Morgan wrote: > >> How about cleaning the fader with some Deoxit? >> >> >> >> Les Morgan >> >> >> >> *From:* Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] *On Behalf Of *Fran >> Cap via Naktalk >> *Sent:* Monday, April 02, 2018 11:20 AM >> *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com >> *Subject:* [naktalk] LX-5 Fader stuck >> >> >> >> Hey all. >> >> Doing my yearly service of my lx-5 and was getting low output levels. >> Couldn't figure out what it was so I replaced the op amps and caps for the >> rec/playback/headphone circuits and troubleshot a bit more. Same issue. >> Noticed that the fader controls now don't do anything, meaning that both >> lights are always on and the fader buttons do nothing. Checked the buttons >> themselves and they do work, but I'm guessing the 4556/ic501 is bad somehow >> or the fader circuit is stuck? >> >> Any ideas? >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Apr 10 00:52:41 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Cap via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:52:41 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Bias trap record. Max or min? Message-ID: Checking over some things and I noticed the nak service manual says "adjust to maximum" for the record bias trap. Shouldn't it be minimum? Playback trap says adjust to min but I would think that you would want the minimum for both. Thoughts? -Fran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-5.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed May 9 13:23:48 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Roland via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 07:23:48 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon sensor and lamp Message-ID: <3859aec9-9c90-7d8e-3953-55364f55200c@verizon.net> Hi, Apparently, I won a broken Dragon where the owner was told it needed a lamp and sensor to play.  It does FF and RW. Is the sensor and lamp easy to replace and are parts available or is this one of those ESL phone calls? -- Roland From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed May 9 14:50:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (calijente@gmx.net via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 08:50:18 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon sensor and lamp In-Reply-To: <3859aec9-9c90-7d8e-3953-55364f55200c@verizon.net> References: <3859aec9-9c90-7d8e-3953-55364f55200c@verizon.net> Message-ID: Doesn’t sound good. If you can FF and RW without the auto stop kicking in, the auto stop light bulb and sensor should be good. There might be other issues. Remove the metal cover of the well door and look carefully at both pinch rollers as you depress “Play” (without a cassette). Do they both engage and move all the way up, until they get in firm contact with the capstan shafts, play a little bit (until the auto stop figures there is no cassette in the well) than move back down, to the Stop position? Try playing in both directions. Chances are the pinch roller arms are frozen with dried grease (and the pinch rollers do not engage fully or at all), though there might be other issues too. Let us know. Axe Sent from my iPhone > On May 9, 2018, at 7:23 AM, Roland via Naktalk wrote: > > Hi, > > Apparently, I won a broken Dragon where the owner was told it needed a lamp and sensor to play. It does FF and RW. > > Is the sensor and lamp easy to replace and are parts available or is this one of those ESL phone calls? > > -- > Roland > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed May 9 16:16:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (B Abbott via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 07:16:46 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] OT: Walkman Service Message-ID: I have a Sony WM-D3 Professional and a National (Panasonic) RQ-J6 that are both in need of service. Does anyone on this list know of anyone who's got the chops to work on these? While I'd prefer local (I'm in the San Francisco Bay Area), I'd be willing to ship them out to a tech anywhere in the US. Thanks in advance! -B -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed May 9 17:22:38 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Mark Margiotta via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 15:22:38 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] OT: Walkman Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am pretty good on the D3. The problem is the main plastic drive gear (wheel) cracks. There is no source to replace the part. I have fixed maybe 10 or so. I tear them down pull the drive gear and repair it with epoxy and then reinstall, lubricate, align and demagnetize. You can still hear a very faint "click" each time the repaired area meshes with the idler if you put your ear to the device, but it is quite inaudible while listening to music. After repair the speed is accurate and there is no fluctuation at all. I know nothing about the RQ-J6. Also I am not a "professional". Just a guy who has fixed a bunch of them. I have 5 WM-D3s in my collection. I feel it is the best sounding small portable cassette player there ever was. Not nearly as good as the D6, but the D6 is more than twice the size and weight. Mark ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of B Abbott via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 9:16 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] OT: Walkman Service I have a Sony WM-D3 Professional and a National (Panasonic) RQ-J6 that are both in need of service. Does anyone on this list know of anyone who's got the chops to work on these? While I'd prefer local (I'm in the San Francisco Bay Area), I'd be willing to ship them out to a tech anywhere in the US. Thanks in advance! -B -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu May 10 04:37:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Marc Mickelson via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 22:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [naktalk] PCB jumpers In-Reply-To: <794392387.7593444.1525919659982.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Message-ID: <1710703124.7599830.1525919841982.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Hi Everyone, I have an audio product that requires jumpers to set the overall output level. I bought some that have 2.54mm spacing and look like others I have, but they are too small. Does anyone know what the next size up would be and where I could buy a few of them? Thanks. -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu May 10 18:53:55 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Jean-Jerome PREJEAN via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 18:53:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [naktalk] =?utf-8?q?=28no_subject=29?= Message-ID: <1189812888.8738.1525971235471.JavaMail.www@wwinf1f11> Hello  recording problem with 582 when rec  stop pushed on simultaneously then pause released the cassette turns to play without recording thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon May 14 15:25:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <1189812888.8738.1525971235471.JavaMail.www@wwinf1f11> References: <1189812888.8738.1525971235471.JavaMail.www@wwinf1f11> Message-ID: <1821632917.956813.1526304346579@mail.yahoo.com> Try pressing REC and PAUSE (not STOP) simultenously, then release PAUSE. -- Ron From: Jean-Jerome PREJEAN via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 12:55 PM Subject: [naktalk] (no subject) Hello recording problem with 582when rec  stop pushed on simultaneouslythen pause released the cassette turns toplay without recordingthanks========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon May 14 15:25:46 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <1189812888.8738.1525971235471.JavaMail.www@wwinf1f11> References: <1189812888.8738.1525971235471.JavaMail.www@wwinf1f11> Message-ID: <1821632917.956813.1526304346579@mail.yahoo.com> Try pressing REC and PAUSE (not STOP) simultenously, then release PAUSE. -- Ron From: Jean-Jerome PREJEAN via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 12:55 PM Subject: [naktalk] (no subject) Hello recording problem with 582when rec  stop pushed on simultaneouslythen pause released the cassette turns toplay without recordingthanks========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon May 14 23:05:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (icarus6@telusplanet.net via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:05:09 -0600 (MDT) Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A Message-ID: <582406084.40217935.1526331909927.JavaMail.zimbra@mailid.telus.net> Hello, can anyone recommend a place in California to repair a CR-7A? probably a belt issue Thanks, Stanley From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue May 15 08:36:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Andrew Burkhart via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:36:04 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A In-Reply-To: <582406084.40217935.1526331909927.JavaMail.zimbra@mailid.telus.net> References: <582406084.40217935.1526331909927.JavaMail.zimbra@mailid.telus.net> Message-ID: Willy Hermann in SF Bay Area repairs Naks. He’s done a great job on my CR-7A. Highly recommended. http://www.willyhermannservices.com/ Andrew > On May 14, 2018, at 2:05 PM, icarus6 at telusplanet.net via Naktalk wrote: > > Hello, > can anyone recommend a place in California to repair a CR-7A? > probably a belt issue > Thanks, > Stanley > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue May 15 08:43:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 02:43:42 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A In-Reply-To: <582406084.40217935.1526331909927.JavaMail.zimbra@mailid.telus.net> References: <582406084.40217935.1526331909927.JavaMail.zimbra@mailid.telus.net> Message-ID: <163628a51fe-1798-4993@webjas-vac161.srv.aolmail.net> http://willyhermannservices.com -----Original Message----- From: icarus6 at telusplanet.net via Naktalk To: Naktalk Sent: Mon, May 14, 2018 10:59 pm Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A Hello,can anyone recommend a place in California to repair a CR-7A?probably a belt issueThanks,Stanley========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglistMaintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue May 15 17:49:34 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:49:34 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] CR-7A In-Reply-To: References: <582406084.40217935.1526331909927.JavaMail.zimbra@mailid.telus.net> Message-ID: <006601d3ec64$521ea0a0$f65be1e0$@jbrudy.com> I WORKED AT NAKAMICHI FOR 16 YEARS AND I CAN CONFIRM THAT WILLY DOES DO A GREAT JOB WHEN HE REPAIRS NAKS. PATTY BERETTA, OLD NAK EMPLOYEE PARTS DEPARTMENT From: Naktalk On Behalf Of Andrew Burkhart via Naktalk Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 11:36 PM To: icarus6 at telusplanet.net; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CR-7A Willy Hermann in SF Bay Area repairs Naks. He’s done a great job on my CR-7A. Highly recommended. http://www.willyhermannservices.com/ Andrew On May 14, 2018, at 2:05 PM, icarus6 at telusplanet.net via Naktalk > wrote: Hello, can anyone recommend a place in California to repair a CR-7A? probably a belt issue Thanks, Stanley ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu May 17 05:36:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 23:36:05 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] suggestion for Nakamichi RX-505 repair? In-Reply-To: <21ED46E3-2D10-41DE-9E0C-2C0BD8107B66@pesco.net> References: <21ED46E3-2D10-41DE-9E0C-2C0BD8107B66@pesco.net> Message-ID: <005f01d3ed90$31c899a0$9559cce0$@twc.com> Was clearing my inbox and found this…..I’m way late to the party, I’m sure, but I have a suggestion: Next time you get a junkmail request to donate money to save a whale or defeat anthropogenic global warming, before you throw that out, strip out the “congealed badger snot” adhesive from the smiley-face coin or whatever premium you earned carefully, and put a ball of it in the best place to stabilize your CAT Window. Save some extra from future fools’ mailings for later use when cleaning, etc. Les Morgan From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of David Pescovitz via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 11:10 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] suggestion for Nakamichi RX-505 repair? Hi there, I’m the very happy new owner of a Nakamichi RX-505 that’s in excellent working condition. It does have one issue that’s slightly annoying: On the CAT Bottom Assembly, one of the two tabs that holds the CAT Window in place snapped off at some point before I acquired the deck. (Fortunately, I have the CAT Window.) The window mostly stays in place clipped by just one tab but it does wiggle and is easily knocked out of place when inserting a cassette. Anyone happen to have a spare CAT Bottom Assembly? Or a good suggested fix for the snapped tab to secure the CAT Window? (Was thinking a dot of a non-permanent adhesive.) Thanks so much! -dp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 57888 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat May 26 01:39:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Roland via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 19:39:09 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi DAT deck??? Message-ID: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> Just curious but I don't think Nakamichi ever produced a DAT deck but did they ever design and test a prototype? -- Roland From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat May 26 01:52:22 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ohr Weinberg via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 19:52:22 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi DAT deck??? In-Reply-To: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> References: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> Message-ID: The Nakamichi 1000 DAT: http://www.thevintageknob.org/THEVAULT1/1000D/1000D.html On May 25, 2018 7:39:09 PM EDT, Roland via Naktalk wrote: >Just curious but I don't think Nakamichi ever produced a DAT deck but >did they ever design and test a prototype? > >-- >Roland > >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >Maintain your account here: >http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat May 26 03:15:37 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (MD via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 21:15:37 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi DAT deck??? In-Reply-To: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> References: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> Message-ID: Nakamichi 1000 DAT transport & D/A converter,kinda rare but possible to find. I owned one as well. MD On 5/25/18, Roland via Naktalk wrote: > Just curious but I don't think Nakamichi ever produced a DAT deck but > did they ever design and test a prototype? > > -- > Roland > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat May 26 07:45:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (MONNOT Eric via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 07:45:18 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi DAT deck??? In-Reply-To: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> References: <00784a53-7e2d-f8ef-0eb9-4a2e230429ce@verizon.net> Message-ID: <048a01d3f4b4$bcc89930$3659cb90$@free.fr> Yes they manufactured a DAT (don't remember the ref.) -----Message d'origine----- De : Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] De la part de Roland via Naktalk Envoyé : samedi 26 mai 2018 01:39 À : Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Objet : [naktalk] Nakamichi DAT deck??? Just curious but I don't think Nakamichi ever produced a DAT deck but did they ever design and test a prototype? -- Roland ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue May 29 05:31:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Vesselin Uzunov via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 03:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi 680zx 400hz test tone References: <979283846.6228880.1527564705945.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <979283846.6228880.1527564705945@mail.yahoo.com> Hi Naktalkers,I have a Nak680zx which play and record,but the 400hz test tone is very weak and kind of dulled. In "Cal/Source" mode the fluorescent indicators barely move 1÷2 marks. This makes aliment of the azimuth  not possible. The recording without azimuth come out good,but a little weak./PH and RH are not in correct  position. /Any thoughts will be very appreciated. Vesselin. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue May 29 15:03:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A4r_Eriksson?= via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 15:03:15 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi 680zx 400hz test tone In-Reply-To: <979283846.6228880.1527564705945@mail.yahoo.com> References: <979283846.6228880.1527564705945.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <979283846.6228880.1527564705945@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <12D477CE704847109CFB50662F6AAF59@Megadator> Hi Vesselin, PB and REC head must be perfectly alligned otherwise the calibration will not work. Begin by adjusting the PB head with a reference tape and then the REC head. Good luck. Brgds Par. From: Vesselin Uzunov via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 5:31 AM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi 680zx 400hz test tone Hi Naktalkers, I have a Nak680zx which play and record,but the 400hz test tone is very weak and kind of dulled. In "Cal/Source" mode the fluorescent indicators barely move 1÷2 marks. This makes aliment of the azimuth not possible. The recording without azimuth come out good,but a little weak./PH and RH are not in correct position. / Any thoughts will be very appreciated. Vesselin. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-6.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jun 10 11:40:35 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 05:40:35 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] 680zx 400Hz test tone Message-ID: A weak test tone when in Source mode is almost always because the polypro orange cap in the tone circuit is bad. There is only one, in the section where the tone is generated. Head alignment has nothing to do with it when in Source. There is a level adjustment for the tone, but there is not enough adjustment for THAT low of a signal. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jun 19 11:34:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (John Kirby via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:34:59 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] may I offer here my CR7-A (London UK) Message-ID: Gentlemen, i shall not embellish with details, I genuinely have found no prohibition but please forgive me I'm living out of storage presently and downsizing and fighting with my phone. I inquire because I think I own a good example, and seek your assistance in finding a welcoming and caring new home for my deck. For a non mercenary acquisitor, I shall be certainly inclined affirm non mercenary predilection. sincerely, jm kirby london e2 0lt 44/7553/485/581 skype/ stms_lon Get Outlook for Android -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jun 19 12:49:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Jayson Levitz via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] may I offer here my CR7-A (London UK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <814899800.2664711.1529405356398@mail.yahoo.com> Are you selling a CR-7A or a CR-7E. The difference is the voltage. The "A" stands for America with it's 120 volts. The "E" stands for Europe with it's 220 volts.  Although to be technical about it there were two versions of the "E" model -  the regular one at 220 volts for Continental Europe and a special one at 240 volts just for the UK. If not sure, check the back of the unit where it will list the voltage. On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 6:07 AM, John Kirby via Naktalk wrote: Gentlemen, i shall not embellish with details, I genuinely have found no prohibition but please forgive me I'm living out of storage presently and downsizing and fighting with my phone. I inquire because I think I own a good example, and seek your assistance in finding a welcoming and caring new home for my deck. For a non mercenary acquisitor, I shall be certainly inclined affirm non mercenary predilection. sincerely, jm kirby london e2 0lt 44/7553/485/581 skype/ stms_lon Get Outlook for Android ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-7.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jul 4 23:41:21 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Brucker via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:41:21 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Dragon sensor and lamp In-Reply-To: <3859aec9-9c90-7d8e-3953-55364f55200c@verizon.net> References: <3859aec9-9c90-7d8e-3953-55364f55200c@verizon.net> Message-ID: Sensor lamps are ok since it will FF and RW.. A cam belt replacement may be what you need. On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:23 AM, Roland via Naktalk wrote: > Hi, > > Apparently, I won a broken Dragon where the owner was told it needed a > lamp and sensor to play. It does FF and RW. > > Is the sensor and lamp easy to replace and are parts available or is this > one of those ESL phone calls? > > -- > Roland > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -- Tom Brucker Hi Tech Service 2934 Nolensville Pike Nashville, TN USA 37220 hitech77 at earthlink.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 5 00:10:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tom Brucker via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 17:10:45 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] Two problematic CR-7A decks In-Reply-To: <40A2D989-C74B-4440-82BD-3C79A8515771@gmx.net> References: <40A2D989-C74B-4440-82BD-3C79A8515771@gmx.net> Message-ID: Deck 1 needs a new (substitute) reel motor. Some motors will run for days before going dead. As for deck #2, stop using C120s. Nakamichi warned against using these. The suggestions about back tension may help. Dirty pinch rollers can also cause tape skewing like you are observing. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:36 PM, calijente at gmx.net via Naktalk < naktalk at lists.naks.com> wrote: > Hi Karl, > > For Deck #1 I would check the take-up torque. According to the service > manual, it should be about 50 g-cm. If you don’t have a torque gauge, try > to stop the take up reel hub with your fingers in play mode and see how it > feels in comparison with the one on Deck #2. Does it feel much weaker? If > so, you can try adjusting VR601 until you feel the torque is similar on > both decks. Make sure you mark down the original position of VR601 so you > can go back to the original setting if the issue persists and you don’t > have a torque gauge. Yes, you might have a defective reel motor. > > For deck #2, I would check the back torque (it should be about 8 g-cm). > Check the back tension belt - is it loose or gone? Swap it with the one > from Deck #1 and see if the problem goes away. > > I’m assuming you've already cleaned thoroughly the tape paths, capstans > and all rubber parts (including the new idler tire). You might want to > clean and oil the capstan bearings as well. > > Not sure about what looks damaged on the left side of the record head. The > left (supply) tape guide is on the left pinch roller arm. It is critical. > Can you show us a picture? > > Let us know how it goes. > > Cheers, > Axe > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 30, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Karl E. Fitzke via Naktalk < > naktalk at lists.naks.com> wrote: > > Hi, everyone. When it rains it pours. Two decks of my three total are > acting up. I'd love to hear from anyone who has any ideas. > > > Deck 1. > > Playback shuts down 10-35 minutes into a side. It appears that the idler > stops takeup, and the deck then stops before more than a loop the diameter > of a pinky finger is pulled out of the shell at the right (takeup) capstan > and roller. I changed idler tire to brand new one that I've had good > experience with. No change. > > > Deck 2. > > Began to struggle with thin tape, e.g. 120 minute tapes (frustrating that > anyone even used those) a few weeks ago, but now munching some 90 minute > tapes. Shorter tapes, on what I presume to be thicker tape stock, seem to > be no problem. But when things go bad, the tape is being twisted as it > passes the left (supply) capstan, and eventually folded over on itself > lengthwise. > > > Any help out there? Thanks for pondering. > > -Karl > > > P.S. > > 1. Intermittent motor failure? Heat related? > 2. Wondering if the roller(s) have lost suppleness and/or diameter. > And one of what look to be guides on both sides of the record head looks > worn or damaged. Guide there seems unnecessary if tension is right though, > no? But if they matter, the suspicious side would be the one letting the > tape slip side to side as it is. > > > > Karl Fitzke > Audio/Visual Specialist > 214 Olin Library > Ithaca, NY 14853 > > 607-255-5521 > karl.fitzke at cornell.edu > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > -- Tom Brucker Hi Tech Service 2934 Nolensville Pike Nashville, TN USA 37220 hitech77 at earthlink.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 13:48:59 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Peter Tanner via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:48:59 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] 581 Message-ID: Hi everybody, I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll try again. I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? Thanks Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 14:02:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (N.van.wijnen@ziggo.nl via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:02:01 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C8759BD-2661-44CD-93AE-92CB223C39D1@ziggo.nl> Hi Peter, If the stop bulb is burnt out the circuit doesn’t give signal. Replace the bulb . There is however a modification. That modification is to solder a resistor in the circuit. If you want to go that way, send me a mail. I can give you details. Best regards Norman Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 19 jul. 2018 om 13:48 heeft Peter Tanner via Naktalk het volgende geschreven: > > Hi everybody, > > I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll try again. > > I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? > Thanks > > Peter > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 14:03:45 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:03:45 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> Peter I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, see attached files (from WIKI) Cheers Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : > > Hi everybody, > > > I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll > try again. > > > I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a > couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't > produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum > yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed > that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that > all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? > > Thanks > > > Peter > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NR-0039_muting_problem_by_stop_lamp_burnt_out.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 73055 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 16:46:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> References: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com> Not sure but I think he means the light on the function buttons, not the transport stop bulb???Bob N From: bb via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:03 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] 581 Peter I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, see attached files (from WIKI) Cheers Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : #yiv1178761894 #yiv1178761894 -- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv1178761894 Hi everybody, I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll try again. I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? Thanks Peter ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 17:14:35 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:14:35 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com> References: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <292bbd62-a408-7e41-07b6-cb6fb693a315@gmail.com> Yes Bob, I was talking about the bulb from the STOP key that activates the muting line. Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 16:46, Bob Naylor a écrit : > Not sure but I think he means the light on the function buttons, not > the transport stop bulb??? > Bob N > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* bb via Naktalk > *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com > *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:03 AM > *Subject:* Re: [naktalk] 581 > > Peter > > I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, see > attached files (from WIKI) > Cheers > Bernard > > Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : > Hi everybody, > > I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll > try again. > > I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a > couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't > produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum > yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed > that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that > all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? > Thanks > > Peter > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki!http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here:http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 18:09:24 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:09:24 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: References: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com> <292bbd62-a408-7e41-07b6-cb6fb693a315@gmail.com> Message-ID: And you can add a resistor as indicated in the mod to avoid any further trouble if the new bulb were to blow again. Le 19/07/2018 à 17:36, Peter Tanner a écrit : > > Thanks, Bernard. I've checked that WIKI file. I'll try to replace the > stop bulb as soon as I can get hold of one. I think I even have a > whole spare assembly of those control buttons somewhere. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Naktalk on behalf of bb via > Naktalk > *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:14 AM > *To:* Bob Naylor; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > *Subject:* Re: [naktalk] 581 > > Yes Bob, I was talking about the bulb from the STOP key that activates > the muting line. > > Bernard > > > Le 19/07/2018 à 16:46, Bob Naylor a écrit : >> Not sure but I think he means the light on the function buttons, not >> the transport stop bulb??? >> Bob N >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* bb via Naktalk >> >> *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:03 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [naktalk] 581 >> >> Peter >> >> I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, see >> attached files (from WIKI) >> Cheers >> Bernard >> >> Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : >> Hi everybody, >> >> I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll >> try again. >> >> I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a >> couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't >> produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum >> yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed >> that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that >> all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? >> Thanks >> >> Peter >> >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki!http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here:http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: >> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> >> >> >> Virus-free. www.avg.com >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 19 17:36:40 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Peter Tanner via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:36:40 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: <292bbd62-a408-7e41-07b6-cb6fb693a315@gmail.com> References: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com>, <292bbd62-a408-7e41-07b6-cb6fb693a315@gmail.com> Message-ID: Thanks, Bernard. I've checked that WIKI file. I'll try to replace the stop bulb as soon as I can get hold of one. I think I even have a whole spare assembly of those control buttons somewhere. ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of bb via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:14 AM To: Bob Naylor; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] 581 Yes Bob, I was talking about the bulb from the STOP key that activates the muting line. Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 16:46, Bob Naylor a écrit : Not sure but I think he means the light on the function buttons, not the transport stop bulb??? Bob N ________________________________ From: bb via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:03 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] 581 Peter I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, see attached files (from WIKI) Cheers Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : Hi everybody, I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll try again. I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? Thanks Peter ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png] Virus-free. www.avg.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Jul 20 00:59:33 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:59:33 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: References: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com> <292bbd62-a408-7e41-07b6-cb6fb693a315@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9f5a5197-f377-aafc-d48d-f5dfcf10d235@gmail.com> We are referring to the small lamp in the front panel stop button, not the auto-stop lamp. I ran into the same thing on a 680 a while back, it drove me crazy until I figured it out.  I added a 1k resistor across the lamp along with replacing the small lamp and the playback audio came back. On 07/19/2018 11:09 AM, bb via Naktalk wrote: > > And you can add a resistor as indicated in the mod to avoid any > further trouble if the new bulb were to blow again. > > > Le 19/07/2018 à 17:36, Peter Tanner a écrit : >> >> Thanks, Bernard. I've checked that WIKI file. I'll try to replace the >> stop bulb as soon as I can get hold of one. I think I even have a >> whole spare assembly of those control buttons somewhere. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* Naktalk on behalf of bb via >> Naktalk >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:14 AM >> *To:* Bob Naylor; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks >> *Subject:* Re: [naktalk] 581 >> >> Yes Bob, I was talking about the bulb from the STOP key that >> activates the muting line. >> >> Bernard >> >> >> Le 19/07/2018 à 16:46, Bob Naylor a écrit : >>> Not sure but I think he means the light on the function buttons, not >>> the transport stop bulb??? >>> Bob N >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From:* bb via Naktalk >>> >>> *To:* naktalk at lists.naks.com >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:03 AM >>> *Subject:* Re: [naktalk] 581 >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, >>> see attached files (from WIKI) >>> Cheers >>> Bernard >>> >>> Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll >>> try again. >>> >>> I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a >>> couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't >>> produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum >>> yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed >>> that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that >>> all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? >>> Thanks >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> Also check out the wiki!http://wiki.naks.com >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here:http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>>           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: >>> http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Virus-free. www.avg.com >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jul 24 16:09:19 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tony Nelson via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:09:19 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1A need Transport Control chip Message-ID: I have a Nakamichi CR-1A with a wonky Transport Control chip, that works for a few seconds until it warms up, or for longer if cooled with freeze spray. The chip is a B11020A, used in several transports, a 8818H (could refer to firmware), based on a Toshiba TMP4315BP. Does anyone have one to sell? -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' ' From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Jul 24 23:08:27 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:08:27 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1A need Transport Control chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <164ce1f2de3-c9c-5697@webjas-vaa196.srv.aolmail.net> I have a very lightly used CR-1A (original owner) with the box. Just listed on Craigslist DC. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, Tony Nelson via Naktalk wrote: I have a Nakamichi CR-1A with a wonky Transport Control chip, that works for a few seconds until it warms up, or for longer if cooled with freeze spray. The chip is a B11020A, used in several transports, a 8818H (could refer to firmware), based on a Toshiba TMP4315BP. Does anyone have one to sell? -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' ' ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Jul 25 23:27:34 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tony Nelson via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:27:34 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1A need Transport Control chip In-Reply-To: <164ce1f2de3-c9c-5697@webjas-vaa196.srv.aolmail.net> (from naktalk@lists.naks.com on Tue Jul 24 17:08:27 2018) Message-ID: <7kFQqVrFU00NUjogxXZDXw@YmnbjG0qvGPY9OgLcQMTI> On 18-07-24 17:08:27, via Naktalk wrote: > I have a very lightly used CR-1A (original owner) with the box. Just > listed on Craigslist DC. Thanks, but I just need the Transport Control chip. > Sent from AOL Mobile Mail > Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, Tony Nelson via Naktalk > wrote: > > I have a Nakamichi CR-1A with a wonky Transport Control chip, that > works for a few seconds until it warms up, or for longer if cooled > with freeze spray. The chip is a B11020A, used in several transports, > a 8818H (could refer to firmware), based on a Toshiba TMP4315BP. Does > anyone have one to sell? -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' ' From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Jul 26 16:31:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:31:01 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1 transport chip Message-ID: <4e28b6d6-d3bf-4577-923d-a53dd777f636@Perrys-iPhone> Sure, I have plenty of those from parts units. You can have one for $2 + cost of shipping. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jul 29 15:05:23 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tony Nelson via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:05:23 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1 transport chip In-Reply-To: <4e28b6d6-d3bf-4577-923d-a53dd777f636@Perrys-iPhone> (from naktalk@lists.naks.com on Thu Jul 26 10:31:01 2018) Message-ID: <6wt6Qr8kzu1qPSEixiuTEu@vPTiwm8WorsazFnHiQ7+U> On 18-07-26 10:31:01, perry via Naktalk wrote: > Sure, I have plenty of those from parts units. You can have one for > $2 + cost of shipping. Woot! -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' ' From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Jul 29 21:55:02 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Peter Tanner via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 19:55:02 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] 581 In-Reply-To: References: <742ee829-79a4-8152-35d5-2d46ce405ab7@gmail.com> <122514931.6660200.1532011565050@mail.yahoo.com>, <292bbd62-a408-7e41-07b6-cb6fb693a315@gmail.com>, Message-ID: Thanks for the help, all. I soldered in the resistor as per the wiki page and the sound is back. The little bulb seemed almost impossible to change. Broke the two old spares I had and I don't know where to get hold of new ones. There is no stop light but the deck works so thanks again. Peter ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of Peter Tanner via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:36 AM To: bb; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] 581 Thanks, Bernard. I've checked that WIKI file. I'll try to replace the stop bulb as soon as I can get hold of one. I think I even have a whole spare assembly of those control buttons somewhere. ________________________________ From: Naktalk on behalf of bb via Naktalk Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:14 AM To: Bob Naylor; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] 581 Yes Bob, I was talking about the bulb from the STOP key that activates the muting line. Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 16:46, Bob Naylor a écrit : Not sure but I think he means the light on the function buttons, not the transport stop bulb??? Bob N ________________________________ From: bb via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:03 AM Subject: Re: [naktalk] 581 Peter I might be wrong but I think your problem is the burnt STOP bulb, see attached files (from WIKI) Cheers Bernard Le 19/07/2018 à 13:48, Peter Tanner via Naktalk a écrit : Hi everybody, I've posted this already but I don't think it has gone thru so I'll try again. I have a 581 I have not used for a while. The last time, about a couple of months ago it played perfectly. Now, however it doesn't produce any sound. The transport is fine, output level is on maximum yet there is no sound. The needles don't move either. I've noticed that the play and stop light bulbs are burnt out but other than that all seems fine except the lack of sound. Any ideas? Thanks Peter ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png] Virus-free. www.avg.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jul 30 15:17:04 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rodrigo via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:17:04 -0300 Subject: [naktalk] Rx202 Message-ID: <71528DCF-E991-4DDF-9F4F-EAC5B0ECB805@terra.com.br> Good day everyone, I Just read that Woot from our group here has control chips for the CR1. Would you, root, or anybody have the master chip for the RX202 for sale? I just refurbished the entire deck and all I need to complete the job is this chip. Thank you for any help you may provide me with! Regards, Rodrigo Krause dos Santos Rocha Sent from my iPhone -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image1.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 160074 bytes Desc: not available URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Jul 30 17:00:27 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Gerhard Wartha via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:00:27 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] Rx202 IC In-Reply-To: <71528DCF-E991-4DDF-9F4F-EAC5B0ECB805@terra.com.br> References: <71528DCF-E991-4DDF-9F4F-EAC5B0ECB805@terra.com.br> Message-ID: found it on Ebay; regards Gerhard https://www.ebay.com/itm/TMP4315BP-1304-Original-New-Toshiba-Integrated-Circuit-/141206437596 GERHARD WARTHA KIRCHENGASSE 41 | 1070 WIEN | AUSTRIA Tel : + 43 (0) 650/5266705 > Am 30.07.2018 um 15:17 schrieb Rodrigo via Naktalk : > > Good day everyone, > I Just read that Woot from our group here has control chips for the CR1. Would you, root, or anybody have the master chip for the RX202 for sale? I just refurbished the entire deck and all I need to complete the job is this chip. > Thank you for any help you may provide me with! > Regards, > > Rodrigo Krause dos Santos Rocha > Sent from my iPhone > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-8.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Aug 4 15:08:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 13:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-3 issues References: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995@mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, I got my CR-3 out of storage and no surprise it didn't want to work as far as the transport goes. Cleaned and lubed and the transport is now working but has an intermittent problem. It will play fine for quite a while then go crazy. It will stop playback, pause light will come on, reel motor will stop. After several attempts to FF it will finally go into FF. At this point the only way to get it to go back to play is to attempt to manually turn the control motor gear. This may or may not work. When the reel motor stops, it's voltage goes to zero also. As long as the reel motor is getting voltage (5V on FF and somewhere around 2 - 3V in play) it runs fine. I've checked voltages around I think it's IC608 and related circuitry however since it's intermittent I can't find anything wrong. Is this problem familiar with anyone or does anyone have an idea on how to proceed? Thank you, Bob N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Aug 4 15:15:17 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 transport References: <221003649.2003383.1533388517711.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <221003649.2003383.1533388517711@mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, I got my LX-5 out of storage. The transport would not engage however after a clean and lube it works fine but sometimes I have to hit either PAUSE or PLAY a couple times for it to go completely in to the selected function. After a couple times the unit seems to work fine. Does this LX-5 just need a little more exercise or should I do something else? The control motor belt was replaced about 7 years ago with a Fred Marrs belt. The belt appears to be in good condition and also appears to be a good fit. Any ideas would sure be appreciated. Thank you, Bob N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Aug 4 16:57:08 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ron & Marion Heuer via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:57:08 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-3 issues In-Reply-To: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <83394249-7ADD-4BDF-B8F4-9E08DA2629B9@aol.com> I have the same issue. Had it repaired twice. I’m now on a waiting list to have it overhauled at Willy Hermann Svcs. Ron Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 4, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Bob Naylor via Naktalk wrote: > > Hi all, I got my CR-3 out of storage and no surprise it didn't want to work as far as the transport goes. Cleaned and lubed and the transport is now working but has an intermittent problem. > > It will play fine for quite a while then go crazy. It will stop playback, pause light will come on, reel motor will stop. After several attempts to FF it will finally go into FF. At this point the only way to get it to go back to play is to attempt to manually turn the control motor gear. This may or may not work. > > When the reel motor stops, it's voltage goes to zero also. As long as the reel motor is getting voltage (5V on FF and somewhere around 2 - 3V in play) it runs fine. > > I've checked voltages around I think it's IC608 and related circuitry however since it's intermittent I can't find anything wrong. > > Is this problem familiar with anyone or does anyone have an idea on how to proceed? > > Thank you, Bob N > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sun Aug 5 18:30:20 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 16:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-3 issues update In-Reply-To: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1699149365.2353827.1533486620277@mail.yahoo.com> It appears like the problem is the control motor. I cannot make it move and the windings measure 450 ohms with it electrically removed from the circuit. When a function button is pressed I get 6 volts or so for less than a second then goes back to zero volts. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thank you, Bob N On Saturday, August 4, 2018, 6:08:16 AM PDT, Bob Naylor via Naktalk wrote: Hi all, I got my CR-3 out of storage and no surprise it didn't want to work as far as the transport goes. Cleaned and lubed and the transport is now working but has an intermittent problem. It will play fine for quite a while then go crazy. It will stop playback, pause light will come on, reel motor will stop. After several attempts to FF it will finally go into FF. At this point the only way to get it to go back to play is to attempt to manually turn the control motor gear. This may or may not work. When the reel motor stops, it's voltage goes to zero also. As long as the reel motor is getting voltage (5V on FF and somewhere around 2 - 3V in play) it runs fine. I've checked voltages around I think it's IC608 and related circuitry however since it's intermittent I can't find anything wrong. Is this problem familiar with anyone or does anyone have an idea on how to proceed? Thank you, Bob N========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 6 18:30:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 12:30:03 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 Message-ID: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> The LX-5 more than likely just needs a new cam belt. 7 years, with any good length of time unused, and they start to slip SBM-4.8 is ideal. CR-3 sounds like it needs a new cam motor, fairly common failure. The reel motor probably too, as this is a dog chase tail instance. Voltage goes away because motor stops due to dead spot, not usually the other way around. Never (well very rare) seen a transport just intermittently stops sending voltage in a mode. If you can leave it on FF w/o a tape basically indefinitely, then it is not likely the logic. Dead spot only occurs in play mode. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 6 22:37:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 In-Reply-To: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Perry, Thank you. On the CR-3... I've never seen a good motor that has a winding resistance of 450 ohms so I did figure out that motor is bad. I've seen other part numbers for new motors on forums so will try that. Any opinions on a new motor would be appreciated. The LX-5 had a new control motor/cam motor belt about ten years ago but has very little mileage on it, but it is ten years old now. Easy enough to do on those so will try and get one from Marrs. Thank you, Bob N From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 9:32 AM Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 The LX-5 more than likely just needs a new cam belt. 7 years, with any good length of time unused, and they start to slip SBM-4.8 is ideal. CR-3 sounds like it needs a new cam motor, fairly common failure. The reel motor probably too, as this is a dog chase tail instance. Voltage goes away because motor stops due to dead spot, not usually the other way around. Never (well very rare) seen a transport just intermittently stops sending voltage in a mode. If you can leave it on FF w/o a tape basically indefinitely, then it is not likely the logic. Dead spot only occurs in play mode. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Aug 7 17:46:42 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 In-Reply-To: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <2085385923.3413006.1533656802158@mail.yahoo.com> Perry, and all, For the LX-5, After thinking about it for a day I now remember that the idler tyre is always coming in contact with the reel table/spindle but doesn't always get "traction" on the reel table. This tells me the control motor/cam motor and belt are doing their job.  I tried to clean the tyre, I only had denatured alcohol, no rubber cleaner however I figured I had nothing to lose. I also "roughed" up the tyre rubber. These two steps got it to play 8 times out of 10, and the 2 times it did not play going from stop back to play a couple times got it to go.  Everytime it had a problem it was the tyre not getting traction on the reel table. In stop mode it felt like the take up spindle was a little tough to turn however it feels the same as my other LX-5 which works fine. Any comments? Thank you Bob N From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 9:32 AM Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 The LX-5 more than likely just needs a new cam belt. 7 years, with any good length of time unused, and they start to slip SBM-4.8 is ideal. CR-3 sounds like it needs a new cam motor, fairly common failure. The reel motor probably too, as this is a dog chase tail instance. Voltage goes away because motor stops due to dead spot, not usually the other way around. Never (well very rare) seen a transport just intermittently stops sending voltage in a mode. If you can leave it on FF w/o a tape basically indefinitely, then it is not likely the logic. Dead spot only occurs in play mode. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 8 08:48:24 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Pescovitz via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:48:24 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi everyone, I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) Here’s a video: https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. Here’s a video: https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? I appreciate the help! Thanks, David From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 8 11:24:14 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:24:14 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi David, On the RX-505, This behavior typically happens when the tape is not correctly "tensed"  (sorry but not sure with this word), I mean too loose, and is not pinched between the two pressure rollers and the two capstans, or at least the take-up one. Actually, the tape goes abose the capstan instead of going below it, therefore the deck behaves as you do have any capstan traction. Tis is why it does spin when you do not insert a cassette. To probe this hypothesis, please insert in the deck a tape for which you will have tensed manually the tape and check if the behavior changes. If it does, the problem can come from a poor cam belt. Let us know Bernard Le 08/08/2018 à 08:48, David Pescovitz via Naktalk a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. > > But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY > > When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg > > I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? > > I appreciate the help! > > Thanks, > David > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 8 19:12:15 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (=?utf-8?Q?P=C3=A4r_Eriksson?= via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 19:12:15 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] CR-3 issues In-Reply-To: <83394249-7ADD-4BDF-B8F4-9E08DA2629B9@aol.com> References: <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1640040881.2025502.1533388083995@mail.yahoo.com> <83394249-7ADD-4BDF-B8F4-9E08DA2629B9@aol.com> Message-ID: <0BE0C401084F4D848FC7EF218DD3339C@Megadator> Hi, I had this on a CR-4E. After cleaning all the electrical switches on the mechanism acctuator motor the fault diappeared. Regrds Pelle. From: Ron & Marion Heuer via Naktalk Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2018 4:57 PM To: Bob Naylor ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] CR-3 issues I have the same issue. Had it repaired twice. I’m now on a waiting list to have it overhauled at Willy Hermann Svcs. Ron Sent from my iPhone On Aug 4, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Bob Naylor via Naktalk wrote: Hi all, I got my CR-3 out of storage and no surprise it didn't want to work as far as the transport goes. Cleaned and lubed and the transport is now working but has an intermittent problem. It will play fine for quite a while then go crazy. It will stop playback, pause light will come on, reel motor will stop. After several attempts to FF it will finally go into FF. At this point the only way to get it to go back to play is to attempt to manually turn the control motor gear. This may or may not work. When the reel motor stops, it's voltage goes to zero also. As long as the reel motor is getting voltage (5V on FF and somewhere around 2 - 3V in play) it runs fine. I've checked voltages around I think it's IC608 and related circuitry however since it's intermittent I can't find anything wrong. Is this problem familiar with anyone or does anyone have an idea on how to proceed? Thank you, Bob N ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 8 19:09:49 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Pescovitz via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:09:49 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <638EB349-E234-4691-9CE6-8A67CC738215@pesco.net> Hi, Thanks for the reply! I tried with multiple cassettes that I know are good and the problem persisted. Is it likely to be anything other than the cam belt and is replacing it an easy fix? Lastly, can anyone recommend a good tech in the SF Bay Area? I’d prefer not to deal with shipping it out. I’d love to drive it over to Willy Hermann but as I understand it, he has a very long wait time and, more importantly, only does complete rebuilds these days. Thanks! -dp > On Aug 8, 2018, at 2:24 AM, bb wrote: > > Hi David, > > On the RX-505, This behavior typically happens when the tape is not correctly "tensed" (sorry but not sure with this word), I mean too loose, and is not pinched between the two pressure rollers and the two capstans, or at least the take-up one. Actually, the tape goes abose the capstan instead of going below it, therefore the deck behaves as you do have any capstan traction. > > Tis is why it does spin when you do not insert a cassette. > > To probe this hypothesis, please insert in the deck a tape for which you will have tensed manually the tape and check if the behavior changes. > > If it does, the problem can come from a poor cam belt. > > Let us know > > Bernard > > > > > Le 08/08/2018 à 08:48, David Pescovitz via Naktalk a écrit : >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. >> >> But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) >> >> Here’s a video: >> https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY >> >> When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. >> >> Here’s a video: >> https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg >> >> I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? >> >> I appreciate the help! >> >> Thanks, >> David >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 8 21:52:30 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Andrew Burkhart via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:52:30 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: <638EB349-E234-4691-9CE6-8A67CC738215@pesco.net> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> <638EB349-E234-4691-9CE6-8A67CC738215@pesco.net> Message-ID: Did you get that info directly from Willy? If not, contact him directly. He has a website and I believe his phone number is on there, or at least his email address. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk On Behalf Of David Pescovitz via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:10 AM To: bb Cc: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? Hi, Thanks for the reply! I tried with multiple cassettes that I know are good and the problem persisted. Is it likely to be anything other than the cam belt and is replacing it an easy fix? Lastly, can anyone recommend a good tech in the SF Bay Area? I’d prefer not to deal with shipping it out. I’d love to drive it over to Willy Hermann but as I understand it, he has a very long wait time and, more importantly, only does complete rebuilds these days. Thanks! -dp > On Aug 8, 2018, at 2:24 AM, bb wrote: > > Hi David, > > On the RX-505, This behavior typically happens when the tape is not correctly "tensed" (sorry but not sure with this word), I mean too loose, and is not pinched between the two pressure rollers and the two capstans, or at least the take-up one. Actually, the tape goes abose the capstan instead of going below it, therefore the deck behaves as you do have any capstan traction. > > Tis is why it does spin when you do not insert a cassette. > > To probe this hypothesis, please insert in the deck a tape for which you will have tensed manually the tape and check if the behavior changes. > > If it does, the problem can come from a poor cam belt. > > Let us know > > Bernard > > > > > Le 08/08/2018 à 08:48, David Pescovitz via Naktalk a écrit : >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. >> >> But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) >> >> Here’s a video: >> https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY >> >> When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. >> >> Here’s a video: >> https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg >> >> I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? >> >> I appreciate the help! >> >> Thanks, >> David >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 00:59:16 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 17:59:16 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <43db3291-399f-ab91-23e9-be2e8d186e9b@gmail.com> You may need to clean the reel drive idler, the small rubber wheel between the two spindles.  It looks as though you have no take up torque. You may not need to replace it, it might just work after a cleaning. This website can give you some information about what to do. https://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. > > But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY > > When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg > > I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? > > I appreciate the help! > > Thanks, > David > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 01:08:03 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Fran Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 18:08:03 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <0fafba4e-3b85-5d4f-8f26-5bed2af33836@gmail.com> I see this deck has the Nak "classic" mech, not the Sankyo transport.  It can be tricky to work on.  The previous email I sent probably does not apply. I would remove the transport, dissassemble it, clean out the old grease and oil, relube it, realign it.  This may be beyond what you can do, not knowing what your experience level is.  You may be able to clean the idler tire, but it is not so easy to get to. The transport is assembled like a sandwich, and the roller is inside of it, not easily accessible. Good luck with it. On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. > > But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY > > When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg > > I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? > > I appreciate the help! > > Thanks, > David > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 06:57:27 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Jarmo Latva-Aijo via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:57:27 +0300 Subject: [naktalk] CR-3E won't erase Message-ID: Greetings from Finland. At first my native language is not English. Nakamichi CR-3E won't erase the tape. I have googled many times and found out that it must have something to do with OSC board (what is it?) and orange drop capacitor(s) in it. Unfortunate I cannot read schematics - but can solder, if somebody shows me exact capacitors to change. Does anybody have the photo of that model's "Osc board" and what capacitors to change. Many thanks -L From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 04:32:30 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Pescovitz via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 19:32:30 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> <638EB349-E234-4691-9CE6-8A67CC738215@pesco.net> Message-ID: <6836A66A-504E-4E70-BC36-A36EA9B7DAD8@pesco.net> Yes, just confirmed from Willy: "Over the years I have found that doing specific repairs is not advisable given the age of these decks. Such service is essentially me giving the deck a clean bill of health. When something breaks in six months you think poorly of me. Consequently, all I do is full service which repairs any specific problems and entails removing the transport mechanism, dismantling it, cleaning out old lubricants and replacing them, replacing needy rubber parts, mechanical calibration, reassembly, electronic calibration and verification of original specifications. After a rebuild I return the deck to you with a one year warranty - the same as when new. Cost for a rebuild is around $550. Right now my wait time is around 9 months.” I truly respect his approach and his Nak mastery but unfortunately I can't afford a complete rebuild right now. So I’m just looking to have this new issue repaired in the hopes that the unit will continue to work (for a while anyway) as it did until a few days ago. -dp > On Aug 8, 2018, at 12:52 PM, Andrew Burkhart wrote: > > Did you get that info directly from Willy? If not, contact him directly. He has a website and I believe his phone number is on there, or at least his email address. > > Andrew > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk On Behalf Of David Pescovitz via Naktalk > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:10 AM > To: bb > Cc: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? > > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply! > > I tried with multiple cassettes that I know are good and the problem persisted. > > Is it likely to be anything other than the cam belt and is replacing it an easy fix? > > Lastly, can anyone recommend a good tech in the SF Bay Area? I’d prefer not to deal with shipping it out. I’d love to drive it over to Willy Hermann but as I understand it, he has a very long wait time and, more importantly, only does complete rebuilds these days. > > Thanks! > > -dp > > > >> On Aug 8, 2018, at 2:24 AM, bb wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> On the RX-505, This behavior typically happens when the tape is not correctly "tensed" (sorry but not sure with this word), I mean too loose, and is not pinched between the two pressure rollers and the two capstans, or at least the take-up one. Actually, the tape goes abose the capstan instead of going below it, therefore the deck behaves as you do have any capstan traction. >> >> Tis is why it does spin when you do not insert a cassette. >> >> To probe this hypothesis, please insert in the deck a tape for which you will have tensed manually the tape and check if the behavior changes. >> >> If it does, the problem can come from a poor cam belt. >> >> Let us know >> >> Bernard >> >> >> >> >> Le 08/08/2018 à 08:48, David Pescovitz via Naktalk a écrit : >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. >>> >>> But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) >>> >>> Here’s a video: >>> https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY >>> >>> When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. >>> >>> Here’s a video: >>> https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg >>> >>> I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? >>> >>> I appreciate the help! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> David >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >>> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >>> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >>> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 08:35:31 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Pescovitz via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 23:35:31 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] Fwd: RX-505 issue, please help? References: <43db3291-399f-ab91-23e9-be2e8d186e9b@gmail.com> Message-ID: Ah, thanks for this. I was excited for a moment about cleaning the reel drive idler as a possible fix... until I saw your second email. I appreciate it but yes, removing the transport, etc. is beyond my ability and I’ll need to find a tech for that. I appreciate your help though! thanks, dp > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Fran Flynn via Naktalk > Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? > Date: August 8, 2018 at 4:08:03 PM PDT > To: David Pescovitz via Naktalk > Reply-To: Fran Flynn , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > I see this deck has the Nak "classic" mech, not the Sankyo transport. It can be tricky to work on. The previous email I sent probably does not apply. > > I would remove the transport, dissassemble it, clean out the old grease and oil, relube it, realign it. This may be beyond what you can do, not knowing what your experience level is. You may be able to clean the idler tire, but it is not so easy to get to. The transport is assembled like a sandwich, and the roller is inside of it, not easily accessible. > > Good luck with it. > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Fran Flynn via Naktalk > Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? > Date: August 8, 2018 at 3:59:16 PM PDT > To: David Pescovitz via Naktalk > Reply-To: Fran Flynn , Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > > You may need to clean the reel drive idler, the small rubber wheel between the two spindles. It looks as though you have no take up torque. > > You may not need to replace it, it might just work after a cleaning. > > This website can give you some information about what to do. > > https://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm > > > > > > On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. >> >> But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) >> >> Here’s a video: >> https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY >> >> When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. >> >> Here’s a video: >> https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg >> >> I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? >> >> I appreciate the help! >> >> Thanks, >> David >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 16:33:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:33:09 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I would have to agree with Willie Herman here. What I have done is buy them "broken" on ebay, rebuild them, realign them ( I use a Sound Technology 1510 and some old but good alignment tapes) and "flip" them back to ebay. I don't usually charge as much as Willie, but it always ends up taking a lot of time, so to be fair, "around $550" is a reasonable price. On a 40 year old consumer audio piece, particularly an electro-mechanical piece, there is usually a lot to do to bring it back up to original specs. I am "likenuagain" (like new again) on ebay, but I have nothing up there currently. It's tough to do while working full time as well. I see this deck has the Nak "classic" mech, not the Sankyo transport. It can be tricky to work on. The previous email I sent probably does not apply. I would remove the transport, dissassemble it, clean out the old grease and oil, relube it, realign it. This may be beyond what you can do, not knowing what your experience level is. You may be able to clean the idler tire, but it is not so easy to get to. The transport is assembled like a sandwich, and the roller is inside of it, not easily accessible. On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: Hi everyone, I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) Here’s a video:https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. Here’s a video:https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? I appreciate the help! Thanks, David ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 17:51:26 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 In-Reply-To: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <406878518.4815462.1533829886889@mail.yahoo.com> LX-5 update... After letting the deck sit for a few days then trying it Perry was right, the cam motor runs fine but doesn't totally drive the gear into position so the motor will still run as it's trying to get it to go all the way into position. After a few tries it does go all the way into position but then the idler tyre cannot get enough traction to spin the reel table/spindle. This tells me that Perry was right, a cam belt is probably needed (will try more cleaning just to make sure) but does need a tyre. I've never done a tyre on a classic transport so I'll have to find myself a few hours of uninterrupted time (not easy) to get it done. When it does play/and or record, the sound is fantastic so this deck is worth the time. Another kinda bonus is it's a dual voltage unit, 120V or 240V. Not that it's a great thing, just kinda cool. Bob N From: perry via Naktalk To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 9:32 AM Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 & CR-3 The LX-5 more than likely just needs a new cam belt. 7 years, with any good length of time unused, and they start to slip SBM-4.8 is ideal. CR-3 sounds like it needs a new cam motor, fairly common failure. The reel motor probably too, as this is a dog chase tail instance. Voltage goes away because motor stops due to dead spot, not usually the other way around. Never (well very rare) seen a transport just intermittently stops sending voltage in a mode. If you can leave it on FF w/o a tape basically indefinitely, then it is not likely the logic. Dead spot only occurs in play mode. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 17:56:25 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: <43db3291-399f-ab91-23e9-be2e8d186e9b@gmail.com> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> <43db3291-399f-ab91-23e9-be2e8d186e9b@gmail.com> Message-ID: <712073738.4784461.1533830185201@mail.yahoo.com> That looks like a Sankyo transport instructions, not the classic transport.Bob N From: Fran Flynn via Naktalk To: David Pescovitz via Naktalk Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 11:19 PM Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? You may need to clean the reel drive idler, the small rubber wheel between the two spindles.  It looks as though you have no take up torque. You may not need to replace it, it might just work after a cleaning. This website can give you some information about what to do. https://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. > > But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY > > When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. > > Here’s a video: > https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg > > I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? > > I appreciate the help! > > Thanks, > David > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >            Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >                          Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= ========---------------------------------------------------------=========           Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------=========                         Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 9 22:32:09 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Francis Flynn via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:32:09 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: <712073738.4784461.1533830185201@mail.yahoo.com> References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> <43db3291-399f-ab91-23e9-be2e8d186e9b@gmail.com> <712073738.4784461.1533830185201@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: classic mech, the 202 has the Sankyo mech. Service manual here: http://pcbunn.cacr.caltech.edu/jjb/nakamichi/nakamichi_rx505_service_manual.pdf On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Bob Naylor wrote: > That looks like a Sankyo transport instructions, not the classic transport. > Bob N > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Fran Flynn via Naktalk > *To:* David Pescovitz via Naktalk > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 8, 2018 11:19 PM > *Subject:* Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? > > You may need to clean the reel drive idler, the small rubber wheel > between the two spindles. It looks as though you have no take up torque. > > You may not need to replace it, it might just work after a cleaning. > > This website can give you some information about what to do. > > https://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm > > > > > > On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while > ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had > a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more > than a couple hours/week. > > > > But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette > and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of > the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) > > > > Here’s a video: > > https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY > > > > When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. > > > > Here’s a video: > > https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg > > > > I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear > shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? > > > > I appreciate the help! > > > > Thanks, > > David > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/ > listinfo/naktalk > > > ========---------------------------------------------------- > -----========= > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > > > > > Virus-free. > www.avg.com > > <#m_-7831641848764443592_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Fri Aug 10 07:16:25 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (David Pescovitz via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 22:16:25 -0700 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? In-Reply-To: References: <05241b71-eda0-42b4-bf06-cc60e37f3982@Perrys-iPhone> <1421440117.2960444.1533587846650@mail.yahoo.com> <43db3291-399f-ab91-23e9-be2e8d186e9b@gmail.com> <712073738.4784461.1533830185201@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <0549B00D-0C5D-408E-A788-ED777BC9524B@pesco.net> Thanks so much for your help! Time for me to take it to a tech, it seems. -dp > On Aug 9, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Francis Flynn via Naktalk wrote: > > classic mech, the 202 has the Sankyo mech. > > Service manual here: http://pcbunn.cacr.caltech.edu/jjb/nakamichi/nakamichi_rx505_service_manual.pdf > >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Bob Naylor wrote: >> That looks like a Sankyo transport instructions, not the classic transport. >> Bob N >> >> >> From: Fran Flynn via Naktalk >> To: David Pescovitz via Naktalk >> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 11:19 PM >> Subject: Re: [naktalk] RX-505 issue, please help? >> >> You may need to clean the reel drive idler, the small rubber wheel >> between the two spindles. It looks as though you have no take up torque. >> >> You may not need to replace it, it might just work after a cleaning. >> >> This website can give you some information about what to do. >> >> https://www.eslabs.com/idler_2.htm >> >> >> >> >> >> On 08/08/2018 01:48 AM, David Pescovitz via Naktalk wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > I have a Nakamichi RX-505 that was serviced fairly recently. A while ago, it developed that squeal when engaging the transport and I haven’t had a chance to lubricate the cam drive gear shaft. I don’t use the deck more than a couple hours/week. >> > >> > But yesterday, after a few weeks of no use, I tried playing a cassette and the UDAR just keeps triggering as if the deck has reached the end of the tape. (Tried multiple tapes and have the same issue.) >> > >> > Here’s a video: >> > https://youtu.be/2Z5O1tmLeDY >> > >> > When I press play with no cassette inserted though, the spindle spins. >> > >> > Here’s a video: >> > https://youtu.be/KWbPHzqMVbg >> > >> > I haven’t opened the deck yet to apply the oil to the cam drive gear shaft. Could a lack of lubrication there cause this? Any other ideas? >> > >> > I appreciate the help! >> > >> > Thanks, >> > David >> > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> >> > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >> Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >> ========---------------------------------------------------------========= >> >> >> >> Virus-free. www.avg.com > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 13 11:47:30 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Chris Cousins via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:47:30 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] Nak 482 Message-ID: Hi. Recently purchased a 482 online. It's the first deck I've brought so by default I'm a rank newbie to the scene. Provided it plays a cassette ok (fingers crossed it does), is there anything I should or could look at doing to it to make sure everything is ship shape. Aesthetically is looks pretty tidy based on the pictures. Play count is at 342. Any tips, ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 13 13:26:23 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Andrew via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:26:23 +0300 Subject: [naktalk] Nak 482 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Chris. If the deck was not serviced, you need to service it yourself or order service in a good company / from qualified person. For example, if it was not serviced, transport need cleaning and lubrication because old lube has "dried", and all orange polypropylene caps must be replaced (not with identical orange caps but with reliable analogs). There may be many positions you have to pay attention to if you want the deck to have accaptable reliability and durability. I bought the Dragon some years ago and had "fun" serviving it... If you want, you may take a look at my "report": https://www.dropbox.com/s/nyzvfllw4t1slkd/Dragon%20Service%20List.pdf?dl=0. Since the time I made this report the PB head has polished with the tape so now it performs well, but I had one strange problem with direct drive (may be related to Hall sensors). So don't expect the great reliability, these decks are very old, even semiconductor devices are not reliable at such age. 2018-08-13 12:47 GMT+03:00, Chris Cousins via Naktalk : > Hi. Recently purchased a 482 online. It's the first deck I've brought so by > default I'm a rank newbie to the scene. Provided it plays a cassette ok > (fingers crossed it does), is there anything I should or could look at doing > to it to make sure everything is ship shape. Aesthetically is looks pretty > tidy based on the pictures. Play count is at 342. Any tips, ideas or > recommendations are appreciated. Thanks in advance. > From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 13 18:18:41 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (alan505 via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:18:41 -0500 Subject: [naktalk] TD-1200II Eject Switch part subsitution Message-ID: I am looking to see if anyone has knowledge of an appropriate substitute part for the TD-1200II eject switch. The Nakamichi Part # is 0B70001 in the parts manual and 0B70001A in the TD-1200II Service Guide. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 13 18:24:53 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tony Nelson via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:24:53 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1 transport chip In-Reply-To: <4e28b6d6-d3bf-4577-923d-a53dd777f636@Perrys-iPhone> (from naktalk@lists.naks.com on Thu Jul 26 10:31:01 2018) References: <4e28b6d6-d3bf-4577-923d-a53dd777f636@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: On 18-07-26 10:31:01, perry via Naktalk wrote: > Sure, I have plenty of those from parts units. You can have one for > $2 + cost of shipping. The chip arrived, I've installed it, and the deck is playing again (and stays in play!). Thanks, Perry! The deck may need some cleaning. It's been idle for a long while with the bad chip. -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' ' From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Aug 13 18:36:47 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Rodrigo dos Santos Rocha via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:36:47 -0300 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1 transport chip In-Reply-To: References: <4e28b6d6-d3bf-4577-923d-a53dd777f636@Perrys-iPhone> Message-ID: <982E9C32-702B-4EF0-8444-7C849C25A202@terra.com.br> Hi Perry, You wouldn’t have the big control chip for the RX202 would you? I can buy the chip, but where do I find the program/software that’s supposed to be in it? Thank you for any help. Regards, Rodrigo Krause > On Aug 13, 2018, at 13:24, Tony Nelson via Naktalk wrote: > > On 18-07-26 10:31:01, perry via Naktalk wrote: >> Sure, I have plenty of those from parts units. You can have one for $2 + cost of shipping. > > The chip arrived, I've installed it, and the deck is playing again > (and stays in play!). Thanks, Perry! > > The deck may need some cleaning. It's been idle for a long while with > the bad chip. > > -- > ____________________________________________________________________ > TonyN.:' > ' > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Thu Aug 16 17:17:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:17:01 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] 482 Message-ID: Umm, yeah, that is not a play count. Its just a tape counter, meaning its a number that keeps Track of where you are relatively, on the tape. It does not count the number of plays. 482 has a myriad of potential issues, mainly,broken eject cable mount due to nylon shrinks and metal screw doesn’t. Then there is the typical classic transport issues, idler tire, capstan&counter belts and counter sense bulb. Good luck. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Aug 18 14:17:05 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (perry via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 08:17:05 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1 Transport chip Message-ID: You are welcome Tony, glad to help. Do you get many people asking if you have a Genie? Sorry, no control chips for a 202, except the ones in mine. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Aug 18 15:54:37 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Tony Nelson via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 09:54:37 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] CR-1 Transport chip In-Reply-To: (from naktalk@lists.naks.com on Sat Aug 18 08:17:05 2018) References: Message-ID: <0a4gxUgvYEWknM+t+7y7il@6pbvyDseQDIoiapNNIZzY> On 18-08-18 08:17:05, perry via Naktalk wrote: > You are welcome Tony, glad to help. Do you get many people asking if > you > have a Genie? On occasion. > Sorry, no control chips for a 202, except the ones in mine. That wasn't me, but people are now looking toward you as a Genie! -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' ' From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Aug 21 19:53:57 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 17:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] CR-3 for sale References: <2001526231.446375.1534874037589.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2001526231.446375.1534874037589@mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, I have a non working CR-3 (120 volt) I'm going to list on e-bay but thought I'd mention it here first. I believe it has a bad control motor. I started having problems with it but I could "help" the motor go into position and the deck would play. It sounded good. The more it was used the worse it got and now it stopped with the head/pinch roller assembly is now stuck in the play position. The motor is getting voltage when commanded. I don't have time to work on this. Does anyone want it for 40 US dollars plus shipping? The cosmetic condition is I would guess an 8 out of 10. Will take pay-pal or money order. Have a great day. Bob N from California | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 22 03:14:21 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Shipping References: <499804034.655129.1534900461356.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <499804034.655129.1534900461356@mail.yahoo.com> Does anyone have an educated guess how much it would cost to ship a tape deck from the west coast USA to the east coast USA? I did the USPS online calculators and ended up with $8 to $38. I would greatly appreciate it if someone that has shipped before can give me an approximate price of what they paid. Gabriel, I answered your e-mail. Did you get it? Bob N | | Virus-free. www.avg.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 22 14:24:01 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi CR-3 for Gabriel References: <2065000618.825143.1534940641292.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2065000618.825143.1534940641292@mail.yahoo.com> Good morning, Gabriel, I've sent e-mails to the e-mail address I see on the naktalk pages here. My replies don't seem to go through but you do see e-mails when I start a "new" e-mail/subject. Not sure why. I did send you an e-mail directly from my other e-mail address this morning, "G-mail" Did you get it? the g-mail is the address I use for my pay-pal. Send me a direct e-mail so then I can contact you. Thanks, Bob N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Aug 22 15:20:11 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Gabriel Radulescu via Naktalk) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:20:11 +0300 Subject: [naktalk] Nakamichi CR-3 for Gabriel In-Reply-To: <2065000618.825143.1534940641292@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2065000618.825143.1534940641292.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2065000618.825143.1534940641292@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <066996DF-690A-4066-9A7C-A9EB81D65AB0@gmail.com> Hello, Bob, I am not sure if I am the Gabriel you are looking for. I did not receive any mail from you... Anyway, you may directly contact me on gabriel.radulescu at gmail.com Cheers, Gabriel, from Romania. Trimis de pe iPad‑ul meu Pe 22 aug. 2018, la 15:24, Bob Naylor via Naktalk a scris: > Good morning, Gabriel, I've sent e-mails to the e-mail address I see on the naktalk pages here. My replies don't seem to go through but you do see e-mails when I start a "new" e-mail/subject. Not sure why. I did send you an e-mail directly from my other e-mail address this morning, "G-mail" Did you get it? the g-mail is the address I use for my pay-pal. > > Send me a direct e-mail so then I can contact you. > > Thanks, Bob N > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist > Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: g:\07. razno\naktalk archive\2018\2018-9.txt ************************************************************************ From naktalk at lists.naks.com Wed Sep 5 03:55:18 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Brandon Rigdon via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 21:55:18 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Cassette Assembly Message-ID: <686B00F5-7716-4A78-B835-4A902BB53447@yahoo.com> Greetings all! First time ever using this mail service, so bear with me if I actually emailed the wrong address or something! I have an RX-505 that I nabbed on eBay recently completely unknown of condition internally. I received it in post and all is well surprising(other than needing probably a new capstan belt, and definitely needing a cam belt) she sprang into life! ...well excluding one big thing... the plastic piece that rotates the tape back and forth is missing! (Where the tape physically slides into) Definitely a important part! Question is, does anyone have that piece? If not, is it possible that I can retrofit the “sled” from the RX-202? Obviously it’s much cheaper to find parts units on eBay of 202’s. There is physical differences of the assembly. The 303&505 are larger in appearance; though I’m only going off of pictures, and lastly the hole placements is different. Not a big deal though, as I could just drill a hole in the middle of the assembly, right? Anyone know if the actual assembly that attaches it to the tape deck is the same (the part that slides into the brass stud with c clip and gears)? Who knows. Hopefully someone here does!! Any help anyone? Would really appreciate it! Thank you Brandon. From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Sep 8 04:55:21 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Les Morgan via Naktalk) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 22:55:21 -0400 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Cassette Assembly In-Reply-To: <686B00F5-7716-4A78-B835-4A902BB53447@yahoo.com> References: <686B00F5-7716-4A78-B835-4A902BB53447@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <022a01d4471f$63b28870$2b179950$@twc.com> Hi, Brandon Just wanted to say "welcome," and that your message posted well and was perfectly readable. Now for the bad news: I don't have a clue about the answers. But you can bet that if anyone here does, you'll hear from them. Best forum I've seen for helpful folks. KUDOs to all. Les Morgan -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Rigdon via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 9:55 PM To: naktalk at lists.naks.com Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Cassette Assembly Greetings all! First time ever using this mail service, so bear with me if I actually emailed the wrong address or something! I have an RX-505 that I nabbed on eBay recently completely unknown of condition internally. I received it in post and all is well surprising(other than needing probably a new capstan belt, and definitely needing a cam belt) she sprang into life! ...well excluding one big thing... the plastic piece that rotates the tape back and forth is missing! (Where the tape physically slides into) Definitely a important part! Question is, does anyone have that piece? If not, is it possible that I can retrofit the “sled” from the RX-202? Obviously it’s much cheaper to find parts units on eBay of 202’s. There is physical differences of the assembly. The 303&505 are larger in appearance; though I’m only going off of pictures, and lastly the hole placements is different. Not a big deal though, as I could just drill a hole in the middle of the assembly, right? Anyone know if the actual assembly that attaches it to the tape deck is the same (the part that slides into the brass stud with c clip and gears)? Who knows. Hopefully someone here does!! Any help anyone? Would really appreciate it! Thank you Brandon. ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Sep 8 05:23:19 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Steve Kulak via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 13:23:19 +1000 Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Cassette Assembly In-Reply-To: <022a01d4471f$63b28870$2b179950$@twc.com> References: <686B00F5-7716-4A78-B835-4A902BB53447@yahoo.com> <022a01d4471f$63b28870$2b179950$@twc.com> Message-ID: <5471f60d-3d29-441d-be7f-bcabdabb031b@ozemail.com.au> Hi Brandon Not aware of where you are located but I have a sled assembly for the RX505 that I bought a few years ago to fix my RX505 before deciding it was too hard. In Australia if you are interested. My cost plus postage to your location. SteveK ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On 8 Sep. 2018, 12:55, at 12:55, Les Morgan via Naktalk wrote: >Hi, Brandon > >Just wanted to say "welcome," and that your message posted well and was >perfectly readable. > >Now for the bad news: I don't have a clue about the answers. But you >can bet that if anyone here does, you'll hear from them. >Best forum I've seen for helpful folks. KUDOs to all. > >Les Morgan > >-----Original Message----- >From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of >Brandon Rigdon via Naktalk >Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 9:55 PM >To: naktalk at lists.naks.com >Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Cassette Assembly > > >Greetings all! > >First time ever using this mail service, so bear with me if I actually >emailed the wrong address or something! > >I have an RX-505 that I nabbed on eBay recently completely unknown of >condition internally. I received it in post and all is well >surprising(other than needing probably a new capstan belt, and >definitely needing a cam belt) she sprang into life! ...well excluding >one big thing... the plastic piece that rotates the tape back and forth >is missing! (Where the tape physically slides into) Definitely a >important part! > >Question is, does anyone have that piece? If not, is it possible that I >can retrofit the “sled” from the RX-202? Obviously it’s much cheaper to >find parts units on eBay of 202’s. There is physical differences of the >assembly. The 303&505 are larger in appearance; though I’m only going >off of pictures, and lastly the hole placements is different. Not a big >deal though, as I could just drill a hole in the middle of the >assembly, right? Anyone know if the actual assembly that attaches it to >the tape deck is the same (the part that slides into the brass stud >with c clip and gears)? > >Who knows. Hopefully someone here does!! Any help anyone? Would really >appreciate it! > >Thank you >Brandon. > > > >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >Maintain your account here: >http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com >========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist >Maintain your account here: >http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk >========---------------------------------------------------------========= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Sat Sep 8 15:18:58 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Kevin Fetner via Naktalk) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 13:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] RX-505 Cassette Assembly References: <1597005549.2161202.1536412738871.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1597005549.2161202.1536412738871@mail.yahoo.com> Brandon,I'm unclear on which part you want; the cassette sled or the clear plastic window? It makes a difference because the sleds are out there as in Steve K's offer, but the clear cassette window is probably the most unobtainium part of all Nak decks. Finding one pristine would be like digging up a gold doubloon in your backyard. I have a 505 and love it...very dryly analytical. But for my ears, I always defect to my 700ZXL. You will need a belt kit including idler tire at some point. There is also a part in the drawer that is very easy to break....a gear I think it was that can receive NO force. I waited quite a while to find one. Also, you don't have to split the transport apart to put in the belts and idler tire. You can take a jeweler's screwdriver and heat bend it to a 90 degree to get at the fasteners you need to. Just look at it a long time before you start and you'll see what I mean. I had hoped by now that 3D printing would have become more available to the masses, but it's largely been over-hyped. That clear cassette window could be printed rather easily from an original. You won't be able to retrofit the drawer from a 202.  That's a question that has been posted many times before, due to the availability of parts Kevin Greetings all! First time ever using this mail service, so bear with me if I actually emailed the wrong address or something! I have an RX-505 that I nabbed on eBay recently completely unknown of condition internally. I received it in post and all is well surprising(other than needing probably a new capstan belt, and definitely needing a cam belt) she sprang into life! ...well excluding one big thing... the plastic piece that rotates the tape back and forth is missing! (Where the tape physically slides into) Definitely a important part! Question is, does anyone have that piece? If not, is it possible that I can retrofit the “sled” from the RX-202? Obviously it’s much cheaper to find parts units on eBay of 202’s. There is physical differences of the assembly. The 303&505 are larger in appearance; though I’m only going off of pictures, and lastly the hole placements is different. Not a big deal though, as I could just drill a hole in the middle of the assembly, right? Anyone know if the actual assembly that attaches it to the tape deck is the same (the part that slides into the brass stud with c clip and gears)? Who knows. Hopefully someone here does!! Any help anyone? Would really appreciate it! Thank you Brandon. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Sep 17 16:54:32 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:54:32 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter Message-ID: <36562172-b896-013f-0f08-4e35e4287389@gmail.com> Hello Naktalkers, I am looking for a 670ZX level meter (0B08716A). The deck I have restored has a meter definitely dead and not reparable (at least into my hands). Otherwise, it works really fine. If one of you has a spare one and is willing to sell it, I would jump on it. All the best Bernard From naktalk at lists.naks.com Mon Sep 17 23:56:35 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Ken Mashlan via Naktalk) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:56:35 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter In-Reply-To: <36562172-b896-013f-0f08-4e35e4287389@gmail.com> References: <36562172-b896-013f-0f08-4e35e4287389@gmail.com> Message-ID: I have one from a 660 where one of the two meters is dead - can't remember if they are separate or not. If you want it, you can have it. I am in New Zealand, so postage would be the only cost. Cheers. Ken -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of bb via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2018 2:55 AM To: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter Hello Naktalkers, I am looking for a 670ZX level meter (0B08716A). The deck I have restored has a meter definitely dead and not reparable (at least into my hands). Otherwise, it works really fine. If one of you has a spare one and is willing to sell it, I would jump on it. All the best Bernard ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Sep 18 13:49:28 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (bb via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:49:28 +0200 Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter In-Reply-To: References: <36562172-b896-013f-0f08-4e35e4287389@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3f9cacc6-147e-261d-7933-ff63c1257b62@gmail.com> Hi Ken, Thanks a lot for your help. I have exactly the same problem (only one is dead) but I am not sure how easy it is to remove one and re-insert it in the VU-meter chassis. Give me some times to check and I will come back to you. Best wishes Bernard Le 17/09/2018 à 23:56, Ken Mashlan a écrit : > I have one from a 660 where one of the two meters is dead - can't remember if they are separate or not. > > If you want it, you can have it. I am in New Zealand, so postage would be the only cost. > > Cheers. > Ken > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of bb via Naktalk > Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2018 2:55 AM > To: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter > > Hello Naktalkers, > > > I am looking for a 670ZX level meter (0B08716A). > > The deck I have restored has a meter definitely dead and not reparable (at least into my hands). Otherwise, it works really fine. > > If one of you has a spare one and is willing to sell it, I would jump on it. > > > All the best > > Bernard > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Sep 18 16:36:17 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Mitchell (US), Mike K via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:36:17 +0000 Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter In-Reply-To: <3f9cacc6-147e-261d-7933-ff63c1257b62@gmail.com> References: <36562172-b896-013f-0f08-4e35e4287389@gmail.com> <3f9cacc6-147e-261d-7933-ff63c1257b62@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a8de237650a42a994874d0fa6855f27@XCH15-06-09.nw.nos.boeing.com> I have a Nakamichi 700 which I have owned for about 45 years now. I've overhauled it a couple times (belts, etc) and still play my old cassettes on it but none of my children see any use for it so I'm going to sell it. What's it worth? Thanks for any input. -----Original Message----- From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of bb via Naktalk Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 4:49 AM To: Ken Mashlan ; Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks Subject: Re: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter Hi Ken, Thanks a lot for your help. I have exactly the same problem (only one is dead) but I am not sure how easy it is to remove one and re-insert it in the VU-meter chassis. Give me some times to check and I will come back to you. Best wishes Bernard Le 17/09/2018 à 23:56, Ken Mashlan a écrit : > I have one from a 660 where one of the two meters is dead - can't remember if they are separate or not. > > If you want it, you can have it. I am in New Zealand, so postage would be the only cost. > > Cheers. > Ken > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naktalk [mailto:naktalk-bounces at lists.naks.com] On Behalf Of bb > via Naktalk > Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2018 2:55 AM > To: Talk about Nakamichi Cassette Decks > Subject: [naktalk] 670ZX level meter > > Hello Naktalkers, > > > I am looking for a 670ZX level meter (0B08716A). > > The deck I have restored has a meter definitely dead and not reparable (at least into my hands). Otherwise, it works really fine. > > If one of you has a spare one and is willing to sell it, I would jump on it. > > > All the best > > Bernard > > ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= > Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain > your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk > ========---------------------------------------------------------===== > ==== ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Also check out the wiki! http://wiki.naks.com ========---------------------------------------------------------========= Naktalk at lists.naks.com mailinglist Maintain your account here: http://lists.naks.com/mailman/listinfo/naktalk ========---------------------------------------------------------========= From naktalk at lists.naks.com Tue Sep 18 17:14:19 2018 From: naktalk at lists.naks.com (Bob Naylor via Naktalk) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [naktalk] LX-5 idler tire References: <776141769.4773261.1537283659631.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <776141769.4773261.1537283659631@mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, It looks like I gotta replace the idler tire on my LX-5. I've never done one on a classic transport. It looks like the transport has to come out. I have the service manual so I can see the diagram but would like to know if there's any tricks I should know about. I'm not going to attempt it unless I have at least a half day so I can take my time. Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Bob N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: